What's new

Robots will make doubling China's GDP by 2035 look easy

beijingwalker

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 4, 2011
Messages
65,195
Reaction score
-55
Country
China
Location
China
Robots will make doubling China's GDP by 2035 look easy
Declining population not the dire trap it seems at first glance
Henny Sender
May 5, 2021 17:00 JST

https%253A%252F%252Fs3-ap-northeast-1.amazonaws.com%252Fpsh-ex-ftnikkei-3937bb4%252Fimages%252F1%252F8%252F7%252F9%252F33989781-5-eng-GB%252FCropped-1620045904R20210503%2520robotic%2520arms%2520Great%2520Wall%2520Motors.JPG

Robotic arms on a vehicle production line in Yongchuan, pictured in October 2019: the world's largest manufacturer will be the largest end market for robots. © China Daily/Reuters


In the 1990s, Chinese carmakers -- eager for the best technology -- were negotiating with their Japanese counterparties to produce cars together in joint venture factories.

The mainland side wanted the latest equipment, the leading edge robotics. To the Japanese, that made no sense. They tried to explain that the competitive advantage of the Chinese side was the seemingly infinite supply of low-cost labor. Given its aging workforce, the Japanese, by contrast, had to use capital rather than labor.

Today, China looks very similar to Japan back then.

To many economists, a working population that peaked in 2013 inevitably means slower economic growth and a hollowing out of the manufacturing sector. Making things still accounts for 27% of China's gross domestic product and has been at the heart of its rise as the workplace of the world. Moreover, demographic changes mean that an increasing pile of both government and private sector savings will go to funding a still incomplete social safety net rather than more productive uses.

Given the aging demographics of its people, how can Beijing even think it can double its GDP by 2035? Along with the need to grow in a more environmentally friendly way and the need to reduce the amount of credit for each unit of value-added, surely the population trap is among the biggest challenges to that ambitious target?

Yet, there are reasons why the outlook is less dire than at first glance. And that is largely thanks to technology and the rapid advances in industrial automation on the mainland.

That appears counterintuitive at first glance. The combination of a birthrate that peaked back in 1987 and ever fewer people bearing the costs of their aging elders is potentially devastating. And because aging in China has been swifter than elsewhere as a result of the one-child policy Beijing adopted 40 years ago, the impact will consequently be greater than in Europe or elsewhere in Asia.

Last year, the birthrate was the lowest since the one-child policy was introduced. Moreover, the fact that the policy was relaxed in 2014 suggests that it alone cannot account fully for the sharp decline in the desire to have more than a single child, according to JP Morgan.

Worse is to come. This year labor's net contribution to growth will be zero; in 2022, it will be negative. In addition, China may be especially unfortunate in that, unlike Japan, it has become old before it has become wealthy. But to write off China's fortunes going forward would be premature.


That is because the mainland is aging at a time when advances in both the proficiency and the economics of robots have improved dramatically. That may well change economic dynamics going forward. China is not necessarily doomed to treading the path of Japan and South Korea, which have seen a hollowing out of their manufacturing sectors as labor costs rose on the back of fewer workers.

"At more than 350,000 units per year, Chinese robotics demand will be by 2024 roughly the size of the entire market globally," write the analysts at Bernstein Research. "The world's largest manufacturer will be the largest end market for robots by multiples over any other country."

That has huge consequences both for China itself and for countries in Southeast and South Asia that hoped to see a wave of investment coming to them as wages rise in their giant northern neighbor. Offshoring may well not happen in the scale neighboring countries once imagined possible.

For China, new technologies will transform the stuff at the heart of the old economy, such as steelmaking. Yet, technology and automation will not simply lend themselves to manufacturing traditional products such as high-end electronics, hardware, and everything from locomotives to telecommunications equipment.

They will also play a large role in China's efforts to grow greener. Indeed, China already has a massive leading edge in areas such as churning out solar panels, in which the country already accounts for up to 80% of world output, and the same for wind turbines.

Finally, the key to lasting productivity is not just to use robots, it is to optimize the way humans and robots work together. China has almost 300 million migrants, 70% of whom have only a junior secondary education, according to data from Helen Qiao of Bank of America. By upgrading their skills, the combination will be even more powerful.

"The increased use of robots in a broad range of barely robotized industries as well as newly fitted out automotive factories gives [us] confidence that the steep demand growth can continue," Bernstein concludes.

For China, a doubling of GDP by 2035 means 4.7% growth per year. To many of its proud citizens, that figure seems too modest. They may well be right.

 
.
Who are going to demand goods and services... robots?

Don't buy into Kissingers zero population growth agenda.

Families are at the heart of the state. If China wants a future of Russia, make robots, not kids. A declining country, a declining economy.

The economy centers around people, not robots. Robots serve people for more leisure time to invent new things.

The more people you have, the more robots to make things are supported by the people. A nation of one person would have trouble managing millions of robots. A nation of 1.4 billion does not have trouble managing millions of robots in the economy. Makes sense.?.

The only reason to hold back population is food security. Since China can't become one large farm, because you have to protect ecosystems and wildlife. Pandas have a right to life and habitat. Therefore 1.4 billion people have food security and modernity should keep birthrate at sustainable 2.1 births per mother.

Don't buy into population decline is winning for China. It is not. China can feed 1.4 billion, so there is no need to decline. The 1.4 billion Chinese in 2050 would ASSIST the country to get stronger.
 
Last edited:
.
Robots will help in compensating for aging population but China's comparative advantage in manufacturing is its population with their work ethic and per worker productivity. With increasing automation, China (and also Vietnam) is set to lose this comparative advantage as companies around the world begin to use robots to manufacture products instead of outsourcing/importing.
 
.
Who are going to demand goods and services... robots?

Don't buy into Kissingers zero population growth agenda.

Families are at the heart of the state. If China wants a future of Russia, make robots, not kids. A declining country, a declining economy.

The economy centers around people, not robots. Robots serve people for more leisure time to invent new things.

The more people you have, the more robots to make things are supported by the people. A nation of one person would have trouble managing millions of robots. A nation of 1.4 billion does not have trouble managing millions of robots in the economy. Makes sense.?.

The only reason to hold back population is food security. Since China can't become one large farm, because you have to protect ecosystems and wildlife. Pandas have a right to life and habitat. Therefore 1.4 billion people have food security and modernity should keep birthrate at sustainable 2.1 births per mother.

Don't buy into population decline is winning for China. It is not. China can feed 1.4 billion, so there is no need to decline. The 1.4 billion Chinese in 2050 would ASSIST the country to get stronger.
China's future is in innovation and not low skilled manufacturing. Big population is not necessary.
Robots will help in compensating for aging population but China's comparative advantage in manufacturing is its population with their work ethic and per worker productivity. With increasing automation, China (and also Vietnam) is set to lose this comparative advantage as companies around the world begin to use robots to manufacture products instead of outsourcing/importing.
China's advantage is no longer in low waged workers but in its infrastructure and supply chains. You can replace low waged workers with automation but not infrastructure and supply chains.
 
.
China's future is in innovation and not low skilled manufacturing. Big population is not necessary.

Tell that to Europe. China's rise is because of large population can sustain exponential growth. If you can feed 1.4 billion, then you can feed 1.4 billion people, create demand for 1.4 billion people. Consumer economy for 1.4 billion people. Even have a basic income for 1.4 billion people. Go hang out with Kissinger for reducing China's population.

Who said anything about low skilled manufacturing.

Big population = big economy. The robots are supposed to serve the people in the coming decades. Africa's population is supposed to be over 4 billion. If China is full of Chinese, with full food security, then no migrants. If China goes under 1 billion because of stupid policies of reduced population is "good". Then open your doors to African migrants. The rest of the world demands you take your share. This is the new Paris Climate Agreement take as many Africans as China can. Then China's future is Europe, old, dying and MULTICULTURAL.
 
.
China's advantage is no longer in low waged workers but in its infrastructure and supply chains. You can replace low waged workers with automation but not infrastructure and supply chains.

Not low wage, it's productivity per worker. Productivity of Chinese workers (or East Asians in general) are higher than the rest of the world. It's a comparative advantage that China is set to lose due to increasing automation.
 
.
Who are going to demand goods and services... robots?

Don't buy into Kissingers zero population growth agenda.

Families are at the heart of the state. If China wants a future of Russia, make robots, not kids. A declining country, a declining economy.

The economy centers around people, not robots. Robots serve people for more leisure time to invent new things.

The more people you have, the more robots to make things are supported by the people. A nation of one person would have trouble managing millions of robots. A nation of 1.4 billion does not have trouble managing millions of robots in the economy. Makes sense.?.

The only reason to hold back population is food security. Since China can't become one large farm, because you have to protect ecosystems and wildlife. Pandas have a right to life and habitat. Therefore 1.4 billion people have food security and modernity should keep birthrate at sustainable 2.1 births per mother.

Don't buy into population decline is winning for China. It is not. China can feed 1.4 billion, so there is no need to decline. The 1.4 billion Chinese in 2050 would ASSIST the country to get stronger.

The factories of the future will be moved to places that are not suitable for human habitation, certain places on the earth or new industrial planets.
 
.
Who are going to demand goods and services... robots?

Don't buy into Kissingers zero population growth agenda.

Families are at the heart of the state. If China wants a future of Russia, make robots, not kids. A declining country, a declining economy.

The economy centers around people, not robots. Robots serve people for more leisure time to invent new things.

The more people you have, the more robots to make things are supported by the people. A nation of one person would have trouble managing millions of robots. A nation of 1.4 billion does not have trouble managing millions of robots in the economy. Makes sense.?.

The only reason to hold back population is food security. Since China can't become one large farm, because you have to protect ecosystems and wildlife. Pandas have a right to life and habitat. Therefore 1.4 billion people have food security and modernity should keep birthrate at sustainable 2.1 births per mother.

Don't buy into population decline is winning for China. It is not. China can feed 1.4 billion, so there is no need to decline. The 1.4 billion Chinese in 2050 would ASSIST the country to get stronger.

Thats a good point. The point of robots is make services automated and therefore cheap and massively scaled up(like factories did with goods). But whats the point of abundant services on tap when you dont have people to consume.You will have to depend on foreign markets and all the political headache.

But at the same time some sort of responsible population control must be there. Remember human wants are unlimited and people have huge capacities and apetites to consume resources.
 
.
300 million people is more than enough for China to dominate world as Numero Uno. In America's 1980s hayday America's population was less than 250 million.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom