What's new

Report: Saudi Arabia Still Seeking Nuclear Weapons Capability

Exactly. Currently, Apart from Turkey, i don't see any of Muslim Country Mature enough to handle the "Power offered by NUKES". They are gonna fire them as soon as they get them. So better it stay's in Pak Hand's. And i do agree future is unpredictable. i can see such development happening around 10 year's from Now.
Well every muslim country around the world can handle the nuke " button" A lot of them are crazy but not enough to launch a nuke... It's mostly infrastructure that lack most of muslim countries to keep those nukes safe and ready to launch...
ANd thos enukes will mostly either be air launched via fighter jets or ballistics ones...
 
.
Well every muslim country around the world can handle the nuke " button" A lot of them are crazy but not enough to launch a nuke... It's mostly infrastructure that lack most of muslim countries to keep those nukes safe and ready to launch...
ANd thos enukes will mostly either be air launched via fighter jets or ballistics ones...

You have got a point there.
 
.
Report: Saudi Arabia Still Seeking Nuclear Weapons Capability
Saudi Arabia viewed as nuclear 'newcomer'
SHARE
TWEET
EMAIL


Saudi Arabia's King Salman bin Abdulaziz al-Saud steps out of his airplane / Getty Images


BY: Adam Kredo
March 31, 2017 1:45 pm

Saudi Arabia is still believed to be seeking nuclear weapons technology in a bid to counter the threat posed by Iran's nuclear program, which continues to operate in an advanced manner despite the landmark nuclear agreement, according to a new report by a proliferation monitoring organization that labeled the Kingdom a nuclear "newcomer."

Tensions between Iran and Saudi Arabia have only increased since the nuclear deal was signed, leading the Saudis to pursue nuclear capabilities, according to the Institute for Science and International Security, a Washington D.C.-based organization that monitors global proliferation issues.

"Saudi Arabia is in the early stages of nuclear development" and is expected to "more actively seek nuclear weapons capabilities" in order to counter the ongoing threat posed by Iran, according to the report.

While the Obama administration claimed the nuclear deal would ease regional tensions, there is little evidence at this point to confirm that claim. Iran has more aggressively backed terrorist organizations since the deal and continues to harass U.S. military assets and allies in the region.

The nuclear deal "has also not eliminated the Kingdom's desire for nuclear weapons capabilities and even nuclear weapons, but rather reduced the pressure on Saudi Arabia to match Iran's nuclear weapons capabilities in the short term," according to the institute's report.

Saudi efforts to pursue nuclear weapons technology is likely to increase in the coming years as the nuclear deal approaches its sunset, according to the report. The country has already stated its intention to build at least 16 nuclear reactors in the coming years.

"There is little reason to doubt that Saudi Arabia will more actively seek nuclear weapons capabilities, motivated by its concerns about the ending of the [nuclear deal's] major nuclear limitations starting after year 10 of the deal or sooner if the deal fails," the report notes. "If Iran expands its enrichment capabilities, as it states it will do, Tehran will reduce nuclear breakout times, or the time needed to produce enough weapon-grade uranium for a nuclear weapon, to weeks and then days."

"With these concerns, the Kingdom is likely to seek nuclear weapons capabilities as a hedge," the report states.

A European government official confirmed to the institute's experts as early as 2014 that Saudi Arabia is pursuing the "scientific and engineering expertise necessary to take command of all aspects of the nuclear fuel cycle."

This type of research has taken place under the guise of a civilian nuclear program, according to the report, which did not find any evidence that Saudi Arabia has begun a clandestine weapons program.

"At this point in time and at its current pace of nuclear development, Saudi Arabia would require years to create the nuclear infrastructure needed to launch a nuclear weapons effort," the report states, adding that the intention to achieve such a capability seems clear.

Right now, according to open source materials studied by ISIS, "Saudi Arabia is concentrating on building up its civilian nuclear infrastructure."

This includes acquiring nuclear facilities and teaming up with nations such as Russia, South Korea, and China to exchange nuclear technology. Saudi Arabia also is conducting research into civil nuclear capabilities and developing a multi-layered staff of nuclear engineers and scientists, according to the report.

"Saudi Arabia appears genuinely committed to importing many nuclear reactors and has pursued numerous cooperation agreements with other countries," the report notes.

While its work is focused mainly on civilian nuclear uses, Saudi Arabia "appears on a trajectory to create domestic appendages that could provide a nuclear weapons capability, even if for some time these capabilities would likely be under international safeguards," the report warns.
http://freebeacon.com/national-secu...bia-still-seeking-nuclear-weapons-capability/

A simple paper will resolve the issue of KSA. This paper heading will be Joint defense agreement between Pakistan and KSA. Suddenly make KSA a nuclear power with 2750 km marks missile with speed 18 Mach + .
 
.
Israel need to make sure KSA does not get nukes. Wahabi is danger to the world.
 
.
Do you think 1.5 billion muslim will run to rescue saudi regime? Monarchy is haram in Islam to begin with. Why muslims didn't protect Madina and Mecca while saudi regime has destroyed more than 90% of early Islamic heritages in Mecca and Medina? 13 centuries after Islam a traitor British made regime called "Saudi" (after a Najdi clan) has destroyed 90% of early Islamic sites in ISIS way. Where were Muslims to protect Mecca and Medina?

http://theartnewspaper.com/comment/...ing-the-cultural-heritage-of-mecca-and-medina

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Destruction_of_early_Islamic_heritage_sites_in_Saudi_Arabia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wahhabi_sack_of_Karbala

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demolition_of_al-Baqi

Aren't early Islamic sites, prophet Muhammad pbuh, his family and his fellows more important than illegal Najdi regime that has ruined 90% of them???

"Najd" is cursed by prophet Muhammad pbuh for many times. He has said all the mischief will be in Najd and from there horn of satan will rise. Najd is hometown, rising place and settlement of Saudis.

So defending from Saudi regime is defending from israel, the US and a british made najdi regime that has spent billions dollars against Islamic countries but ever hasn't spent a penny against Zionists who have occupied first Qibla of Muslims. Prophet ordered us to fight against Jews.

Well I'm not here to say that house of Saud is good or not. tbh you can find better than them.

But when you jump on the Mecca history conflicts... it's always smart to not forget who has done most wrong in it... Yes baby boy, go read the History of Shiite incursions in Mecca and the damage they have done to it. AND you will see why Mecca is under Sunni regime for that long... YOu will be suprised by what you will find. ENjoy the research mister Wannabe...

BEst regards.

PS: Whatever it's Wahabbism or the SHiite Regime... you have to be happy bc BOTH of THEM are cancer... :) same shit =/= name
 
.
Lol dude do you really think Russia will take action against Saudi Arabia to piss off 1.5 billion Sunni Muslims in the world. I don't think so. And it isn't the bear strategy to curb Saudi Nuclear ambitions.
And you gotta be kidding me with Houthi Rockets. Unless Houthi somehow get cruise missiles with stealth and mirv . Forget about those idiots to do anything to KSA

forget about 1.5 billion, remember 20 million Russian Muslims
 
. .
For the defence of Mecca and Medina Pakistan’s 150 and growing warheads are available

The reality is if the Saudis really required them all growth, testing etc could be done in Pakistan
 
.
For the defence of Mecca and Medina Pakistan’s 150 and growing warheads are available

The reality is if the Saudis really required them all growth, testing etc could be done in Pakistan
iran dont want to destroy meca and medina they are muslem too
 
.
iran dont want to destroy meca and medina they are muslem too

You have to prepare for the future

Muslim world is 1.7 billion and growing, power comes and goes and power will return to muslim world

Relying on foreign powers for weapons is not an option so work must be done now so in the future we can benefit
 
.
It is just a question of time before we get it. Of course being one of the most influential countries in the world, a G20 member state, the current flag-bearer of the Arab world (500 million people) and largest Arab economy and most important Arab country (currently), one of the largest countries in the world geographically, the custodian of the two most sacred cities on the planet and the heir of some of the largest empires to date (Rashidun, Umayyad, Abbasid, Fatimid etc.) it is only a natural development.

Also considering our scientific rise (top 30 and soon top 20) and future economic position (14 largest economy in the world by 2050 as per most respected economic reports), a growing population and possibly the driving force behind further GCC integration and being in the neighborhood we are, of course this should be our goal.

We already have 100's of physicists and 100's of people studying nuclear engineering home and abroad. As well as having signed several nuclear deals with almost every nuclear power of note. In fact our nuclear energy ambitions are second to none in the Muslim world as per the Saudi Vision 2030.

When two Arab countries such as Libya and Iraq were on course to acquire nuclear weapons decades ago, nothing stops KSA from acquiring them in a decade or two. Much sooner if such a policy would be implemented aggressively. Funds are not a problem nor human capital. At most political factors could damage such a "project" but once status as a nuclear threshold state has been achieved, the goal has been accomplished.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
It is just a question of time before we get it. Of course being one of the most influential countries in the world, a G20 member state, the current flag-bearer of the Arab world (500 million people) and largest Arab economy and most important Arab country (currently), one of the largest countries in the world geographically, the custodian of the two most sacred cities on the planet and the heir of some of the largest empires to date (Rashidun, Umayyad, Abbasid, Fatimid etc.) it is only a natural development.

Also considering our scientific rise (top 30 and soon top 20) and future economic position (14 largest economy in the world by 2050 as per most respected economic reports), a growing population and possibly the driving force behind further GCC integration and being in the neighborhood we are, of course this should be our goal.

We already have 100's of physicist and 100's of people studying nuclear engineering home and abroad. As well as having signed several nuclear deals with almost every nuclear power of note. In fact our nuclear energy ambitions are second to none in the Muslim world as per the Saudi Vision 2030.
without help of other country i dont see how you in the g 20 because natural resource
 
.
Its strange when people say to protect the holy cities need nuclear power......isn't Allah not enough ? . Go back read the statement of Hazrat Abu-Tablib what he said and went to sleep , when Abraha moving toward Kaba with fleet of elephants.
 
.
Its strange when people say to protect the holy cities need nuclear power......isn't Allah not enough ? . Go back read the statement of Hazrat Abu-Tablib what he said and went to sleep , when Abraha moving toward Kaba with fleet of elephants.

KSA is not only Makkah and Madinah. KSA and for that matter the Arab world need a nuclear armed state to protect itself. If Libya and Iraq had developed nuclear weapons as they were on course to do, they would not have been invaded by foreigners.

How long do you think that Pakistan would survive against India without nuclear weapons? Let me answer this question for you. Not for long.

Also we are all aware of the fact that nobody in this world is stupid/suicidal enough to attack Makkah or Madinah directly. This would be their end!
 
.
KSA is not only Makkah and Madinah. KSA and for that matter the Arab world need a nuclear armed state to protect itself. If Libya and Iraq had developed nuclear weapons as they were on course to do, they would not have been invaded by foreigners.

How long do you think that Pakistan would survive against India without nuclear weapons? Let me answer this question for you. Not for long.

Also we are all aware of the fact that nobody in this world is stupid/suicidal enough to attack Makkah or Madinah directly. This would be their end!
Nuclear may be deterrence, but good enough to annihilate humanity.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom