What's new

Remittances to India dropped by nearly 9% in 2016: World Bank (from $68b to 62b)

Kabira

BANNED
Joined
Jul 12, 2014
Messages
14,383
Reaction score
-20
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Washington: Notwithstanding a significant 8.9% drop in remittances to India in 2016, the country retained the top spot among remittances receiving nations, according to a World Bank report.

The World Bank, in its latest report, said that the remittances to developing countries fell for a second consecutive year in 2016, a trend not seen in three decades. This was attributable mainly to the drop in oil prices and fiscal tightening in the oil producing countries in the West Asia, which has a significant Indian migrant population accounting for a large chunk of remittances.

India, while retaining its top spot as the world’s largest remittance recipient, led the decline with remittance inflows amounting to $62.7 billion last year, a decrease of 8.9% over $68.9 billion in 2015.




Click here for enlarge



In the latest edition of the migration and development brief, the bank estimates that officially recorded remittances to developing countries amounted to $429 billion in 2016, a decline of 2.4% over $440 billion in 2015. Global remittances, which include flows to high-income countries, contracted by 1.2% to $575 billion in 2016, from $582 billion in 2015.

Low oil prices and weak economic growth in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries and the Russian Federation are taking a toll on remittance flows to South Asia and Central Asia, while weak growth in Europe has reduced flows to North Africa and Sub-Saharan Africa, it said.

The decline in remittances, when valued in US dollars, was made worse by a weaker euro, British pound and Russian ruble against the US dollar. As a result, many large remittance-receiving countries saw sharp declines in remittance flows.

India was the largest remittance recipient followed closely by China ($61 billion), the Philippines ($29.9 billion), Mexico ($28.5 billion) and Pakistan ($19.8 billion), making up the top five. As a share of the gross domestic product (GDP), however, the top five recipients were Kyrgyz Republic, Nepal, Liberia, Haiti, and Tonga.
http://www.livemint.com/Politics/AO...ia-dropped-by-nearly-9-in-2016World-Bank.html
 
Interesting thing is 85% of remittances in India goes to Dravidanadu, east punjab and Maharashtra.

Maybe because Maharashtra has Mumbai which is India's financial hub?

People when sending money, route it through banks, which often appears first in Banks head office, hence Mumbai.
 
Maybe because Maharashtra has Mumbai which is India's financial hub?
People when sending money, route it through banks, which often appears first in Banks head office, hence Mumbai.


I do not know how you arrive with these kind of balderdash opinions sans any basis or facts:
You had option to not indulge in the discussion if you did not have enough knowledge on your hand.

Out of the 25 following banks, only 6 have headquarters in Mumbai.

tem57yt6t.png



temfrcvf.png


tem6y6h.png
 
I do not know how you arrive with these kind of balderdash opinions sans any basis or facts:
You had option to not indulge in the discussion if you did not have enough knowledge on your hand.

Out of the 25 following banks, only 6 have headquarters in Mumbai.

View attachment 412305


View attachment 412306

View attachment 412307

The first word I mentioned was "Maybe."

Second, your list is useless. Not all banks are equal.

The top 3 banks in India: SBI, ICICI, and HDFC are all in Mumbai.

6 off top 10 are in Mumbai.

The RBI is in Mumbai.

SBI and ICICI together crush the rest of the competition combined.

https://www.embibe.com/exams/top-10-largest-banks-in-india/
 
The first word I mentioned was "Maybe."

Second, your list is useless. Not all banks are equal.

Look at sheer numbers instead of equality. Because many men many minds, different people have their own different bank accounts.

What equality are you indulged in.

If any Indian wants to open account, what equality factor does think of?
Unwarranted stuff.
 
Look at sheer numbers instead of equality. Because many men many minds, different people have their own different bank accounts.

What equality are you indulged in.

If any Indian wants to open account, what equality factor does think of?
Unwarranted stuff.

Yeah I am looking at sheer numbers, which say that SBI is bigger than all other public banks combined.
 
Maybe because Maharashtra has Mumbai which is India's financial hub?

People when sending money, route it through banks, which often appears first in Banks head office, hence Mumbai.

When they break down remitances, they do on basis of who receive and where. Bank head office have little to do with it otherwise Mumbai will receive more then east punjab.
 
Remittances topped 72 billion USD in 2015 in India, drop is more.

BN-KX233_iremit_G_20151023035558.jpg
 
Yeah I am looking at sheer numbers, which say that SBI is bigger than all other public banks combined.

So your own so called equality factor got thrown out of the window?

I know you want to cut the steak, but please don't use the bread knife. Something you are doing now.

And lest you forget, the remittances pour into India from financial institutions as Western Union and MoneyGrame too.

Now do not Google their headquarters and waste your time because both these entities are US based.

There are 46 major Indian banks, leaving those rural or grameen banks and co-operative banks who can not accept foreign remittances.

Tell me how many of them have HQ in Mumbai.

Go figure!
 
So your own so called equality factor got thrown out of the window?

I know you want to cut the steak, but please don't use the bread knife. Something you are doing now.

And lest you forget, the remittances pour into India from financial institutions as Western Union and MoneyGrame too.

Now do not Google their headquarters and waste your time because both these entities are US based.

There are 46 major Indian banks, leaving those rural or grameen banks and co-operative banks who can not accept foreign remittances.

Tell me how many of them have HQ in Mumbai.

Go figure!

Again, this is a mere theory advanced by me, because Mumbai's location as a financial center and headquarters of a lot of companies distorts some data.

I never said, that so and so thing happened.

I am merely saying that do consider the plausibility of this happening.
 
Again, this is a mere theory advanced by me, because Mumbai's location as a financial center and headquarters of a lot of companies distorts some data.

I am merely saying that do consider the plausibility of this happening.


Well, first of all, this is what transpired between you and Tesky:

Tesky said:
Interesting thing is 85% of remittances in India goes to Dravidanadu, east punjab and Maharashtra.

To which you replied in the following:

Maybe because Maharashtra has Mumbai which is India's financial hub?

Obviously you were flying off the tangent because, while Tesky's thrust was on 85% numbers = maximum (magnitude or punch) remittance and you came upon him from Maharashtra angle which was least expressed by him.

Now the following:

People when sending money, route it through banks, which often appears first in Banks head office, hence Mumbai.

Here we see that you are clearly inclined to believe that most banks HQs are located in Mumbai. Based on your own sentence as implied. So its no more a case of plausibility than a certain (sure shot) state of your mind of yours, because you have used this >>> hence Mumbai terminology = a definite conclusion (on Mumbai)

No senior. It does not auger well for you to try to be a word juggler to save your face by obfuscating the dialogue, the way you want it to, by using the word plausibility or any other extrapolation. There are hundreds of hawks here, watching you from their high perch.

Do not do that and destroy your own credibility if any.
The plausibility was not credible enough.

Additional irrelevant & inconsequential stuff from you; The RBI is in Mumbai.

Why give example of RBI? Do the overseas remittances of Indian diaspora end up there? Is RBI involved in retail banking?

I know you wanted to beef up your response, but not in this futile way though:



rbi.png
 
Back
Top Bottom