Reham Khan faces online backlash over 'beard desecration' picture

[BATMAN]

So sikkhism is the only manly Religion in your books?

Pappeo don't try to be over smart.

Beard is manly thing, but not cutting beard is religious belief of Sikhism.

 

[El Sidd]

Pappeo don't try to be over smart.

Beard is manly thing, but not cutting beard is religious belief of Sikhism.

Not cutting hair not just beard.

@SorryNotSorry

Ask him but i am kinda sure

 

[SecularNationalist]

And how do you think Muslims dont allow you to live the way you want to live?

Or the constitution of the islamic Republic of Pakistan somehow discourages your way of living?

It definitely goes against not just me but against the vision of our founding father.The whole world knows it was constitutionally secular in 1947 but went Islamic in 1956.Later bunch of dictators and feudal lords messed up with the constitutions to fulfill their agendas.Read some history and you will see how we transformed from a tolerant and liberal society into a extremist and intolerant one.Secularism prevails with a common sense hence its logical.
I see this jahalat and twisted concept of religious patriotism everywhere even in my family.

 

[BATMAN]

Not cutting hair not just beard.

@SorryNotSorry

Ask him but i am kinda sure

Same thing.. beard is madeup of hairs.

The whole world knows it was constitutionally secular in 1947 but went Islamic in 1956.

World knows wrong... there's nothing wrong to be Islamic but Islam of 1947 surely differs from the Islam we have in Pakistan today.

 

[El Sidd]

It definitely goes against not just me but against the vision of our founding father.The whole world knows it was constitutionally secular in 1947 but went Islamic in 1956.Later bunch of dictators and feudal lords messed up with the constitutions to fulfill their agendas.Read some history and you will see how we transformed from a tolerant and liberal society into a extremist and intolerant one.Secularism prevails with a common sense hence its logical.
I see this jahalat and twisted concept of religious patriotism everywhere even in my family.

Objective Resolution was passed in 1949 and was incorporated in 1956 constitution.

Do you Not agree to the objective Resolution? Its a legal document not a religious edict.

 

[SecularNationalist]

Same thing.. beard is madeup of hairs.


World knows wrong... there's nothing wrong to be Islamic but Islam of 1980 differs from the Islam in 1947.

By going islamic means putting islam in constitution.
Yes you are right the islam of zia ul haq was very different from 1947.Yes nothing wrong to be islamic in your personal life.

 

[El Sidd]

Same thing.. beard is madeup of hairs.

Oh ok i thought it was made of ceratin

 

[BATMAN]

By going islamic means putting islam in constitution.
Yes you are right the islam of zia ul haq was very different from 1947.Yes nothing wrong to be islamic in your personal life.

Zia didn't introduced any Islam. He actually didn't let Khomenisim over flow in to Pakistan.
After his death country was at mercy of enemies of Islam and here we are today, small graves have been turned into huge complexes and leaders of political parties are prostrating to stones and bones.

 

[RoadRunner401]

How exactly is this offensive to Islam.

 

[SecularNationalist]

Objective Resolution was passed in 1949 and was incorporated in 1956 constitution.

Do you Not agree to the objective Resolution? Its a legal document not a religious edict.

Now that will turn into a long debate.Don,t have time right now to explain the whole scenario behind 1956 constitution and why ayub khan amend it for his own benefit.
The objectives resolution was passed after the demise of MA jinnah and was a start of hijacking phase of secular pakistan.Even in that objectives resolution the point no 8 is to be seen no where in todays pakistan.
"Fundamental rights shall be guaranteed. They include equality of status, of opportunity and before law, social, economic and political justice, and freedom of thought, expression, belief, faith, worship and association, subject to law and public morality"

Zia didn't introduced any Islam. He actually didn't let Khomenisim over flow in to Pakistan.
After his death country was at mercy of enemies of Islam and here we are today, small graves have been turned into huge complexes and leaders of political parties are prostrating to stones and bones.

Sorry i hurt the feelings of a pro zia.
All the suicide bombings and religious extremism etc is a gift of zia ul haq.

 

[BATMAN]

All the suicide bombings and religious extremism etc is a gift of zia ul haq.

That's gift of PPP which is anti Zia.

 

[El Sidd]

"Fundamental rights shall be guaranteed. They include equality of status, of opportunity and before law, social, economic and political justice, and freedom of thought, expression, belief, faith, worship and association, subject to law and public morality"

Why did your bold part not include the subject to law and Public morality part?

Morality in Pakistan is not religiously decided even today.

You can move Mountains but you cannot move the objective Resolution. It is the Objective of 200 Million Pakistanis regardless if they are corrupt landlords or abusive dictators.

You Promotion of rampant idealism is admireable but if Jinnah can use Religion. Religion could sure use Jinnah back.

Have the Muslims forced you to keep beards? They have the legal means to do that you know under democracy. Pakistanis are moderate People. Just because secularim gives a Perfect Cover for the old ruins of caste system and fascism of the tribal fascists. Its used as a trade in power corridor.

You have little idea what you are up against when you mess about with the Objective Resolution. No matter how much you curse your own family on a Public forum

 

[SecularNationalist]

Why did your bold part not include the subject to law and Public morality part?

Morality in Pakistan is not religiously decided even today.

You can move Mountains but you cannot move the objective Resolution. It is the Objective of 200 Million Pakistanis regardless if they are corrupt landlords or abusive dictators.

You Promotion of rampant idealism is admireable but if Jinnah can use Religion. Religion could sure use Jinnah back.

Have the Muslims forced you to keep beards? They have the legal means to do that you know under democracy. Pakistanis are moderate People. Just because secularim gives a Perfect Cover for the old ruins of caste system and fascism of the tribal fascists. Its used as a trade in power corridor.

You have little idea what you are up against when you mess about with the Objective Resolution. No matter how much you curse your own family on a Public forum

I agree with the whole point no 8 of objectives resolution but i bold on the topics we were talking about.
Morality is not religiously decided in Pakistan by the hypocrites who lecture about islam 24/7.Otherwise in 8 out of 10 topics we bring religion into the debate.
If few people have given the power to mess with the constitution for their own benefits they definitely do not represent the whole nation be it 200 million or 1 billion.
You tell me if in todays pakistan a muslim want to marry a hindu or vice versa it,s not possible .So isnt it contrary to the point no 8 of objectives resolution? When you put religion in the matters of marriage,inheritance etc are not you imposing the religion by not giving them any other choice??

 

[BATMAN]

How exactly is this offensive to Islam.

View attachment 483614

Every thing is offensive to Islam... to those who have no clue of Islam.

 

[El Sidd]

want to marry a hindu or vice versa it,s not possible .

You can do That under civil marriage act.

Secularim is already incorporated.

You are making highly opionionated Arguments with No legal backing.

People have looted billions legally and you are still stuck at interfaith marriage.