Ready to kill, get killed to save cows: Sakshi Maharaj

[Kashmiri Pandit]

G A U M A T A
A
U
M
A
T
A



Indians have already built a temple for their pet mass murderer - Modi.


They will lead similar lives until a political party decides it needs more votes and campaigns against an ethnic or religious minority. Then all hell breaks loose and Indians will be caught raping, assaulting and immolating neighbours they've lived alongside entire lives.

U Called

 

[ayesha.a]

And you're telling me Modi did not become a hero in India? The problem is common to both us and you.

Yes, Modi is a hero for a large number of Indians. He enjoys celebrity status. But as I said before, it's not like Modi is a convicted terrorist or murderer. If he was, ie if he was proven in a court of law to be responsible in any way (let alone for having personally responsible), then he would not be worshipped as a hero by anybody, hindu or muslims or whatever.

Most Indians who hero worship him, believe that he had nothing to do with the 2002 riots. If they knew/felt that Modi was responsible, they would not worship him so. That much is certain, even about people who celebrate him.

And therein lies the difference - nobody doubts that the killer of Salman Taseer killed Salman Taseer. In fact, it is precisely BECAUSE he did that deed, that he is worshiped. He was garlanded and celebrated FOR having killed Mr Taseer.

In contrast, Modi is worshipped by a very large percentage of Indians BECAUSE they believe Modi is innocent, not because they believe Modi is responsible for the mayhem.

I know this much about my countrypeople - other than a few extremist hindus like the people in Bajrang Dal or VHP, most hindus (to say nothing about others) would not hero worship anybody who was responsible for riots and murders. But your countrymen, including, worryingly, educated people in positions of power, like judges, loved Mumtaz Qadri for having killed Taseer, not because he is considered innocent.

 

[American Pakistani]

Yes, Modi is a hero for a large number of Indians. He enjoys celebrity status. But as I said before, it's not like Modi is a convicted terrorist or murderer. If he was, ie if he was proven in a court of law to be responsible in any way (let alone for having personally responsible), then he would not be worshipped as a hero by anybody, hindu or muslims or whatever.

Most Indians who hero worship him, believe that he had nothing to do with the 2002 riots. If they knew/felt that Modi was responsible, they would not worship him so. That much I do know, even about people who celebrate him.

And therein lies the difference - nobody doubts that the killer of Salman Taseer killed Salman Taseer. In fact, it is precisely BECAUSE he did that deed, that he is worshiped.

In contrast, Modi is worshipped by a very large percentage of Indians BECAUSE they believe Modi is innocent, not because they believe Modi is responsible for the mayhem.

I know this much about my countrypeople - other than a few extremist hindus like the people in Bajrang Dal or VHP, most hindus (to say nothing about others) would not hero worship anybody who was responsible for riots and murders. But your countrymen, including, worryingly, educated people in positions of power, like judges, loved Mumtaz Qadri BECAUSE he killed Taseer, not because he is considered innocent.

Wow, that's a huge post. Working overtime I guess.

Hopefully you will be accepted. I pray, I promise.

 

[ayesha.a]

Then was Malegaon and Samjhauta done by someone else? Not the Hindutvas?

It was done by hindu terrorists, to the best of my knowledge; but what is your point?

They were still ragtag terrorists, from an organization called "Abhinav Bharat". They are still not a militia, just a hindu extremist organization that committed an act of terror. They should be (and were) arrested by police operations. They are not an entity that India as a nation needs to go to war against. It is the scale of operations that is the key - your extremist groups are large, well funded, well trained and well armed. The extremist organizations in India are not even capable of engaging in a battle with state police forces, let alone the CRPF or army.

After the arrest of Purohit and the woman (I forget her name), has there been any activity from that group?

Wow, that's a huge post. Working overtime I guess.

Hopefully you will be accepted. I pray, I promise.

Accepted by who? Could you be a bit clearer? Or elaborate?

 

[American Pakistani]

Accepted by who? Could you be a bit clearer? Or elaborate?

Those who to you are working over time for.

 

[ayesha.a]

There is nothing wrong with living peacefully with different religions. But when one religion imposes its rules on the other it is unfair. India has done this constantly.

Agreed. It is unfair for one religion to impose its rule on others. And yes, in India, there are a few laws that seem like hindu beliefs being imposed on others. For example, the law against cow-killing that many states have. (Not all, mind you; there are many places where you can enjoy delicious beef dishes.)

But is it any different in Pakistan? As I asked another Pakistani a week back, what would happen to a hindu or christian in Pakistan who drinks beer or opens a bar? Does Pakistan allow non-muslims to violate Islamic beliefs and practices? Doesn't Pakistan impose religious rules on everybody?

Personally, I would like complete separation of religion and government, people who have certain beliefs can follow them, but not force others to follow them. But one cannot pretend that India is worse than Pakistan when it comes to one religion imposing its rules on others.

As I said unless you suffer in such riots it is hard to make you understand the use and benefit of the formation of Pakistan. It was built for us. us Lucknowis Madrasis hyderabadis and others. If you cannot see it it is very unfortunate.

I actually do have a close person (can't go into details) suffer in the 2002 riots. That person was destroyed and devastated, as always happens in such atrocities. Even today, that person is a shadow of his former self, unable to function normally. I wouldn't want that to happen to a single human being on earth.

But has Pakistan been any safer? Have people not suffered equally, if not more? Have there not been riots, atrocities? In the past few years, how many Pakistanis have been killed for religious and sectarian reasons? Since 1947, which country has suffered more casualties in riots and other human made catastrophes?

 

[Kashmiri Pandit]

Agreed. It is unfair for one religion to impose its rule on others. And yes, in India, there are a few laws that seem like hindu beliefs being imposed on others. For example, the law against cow-killing that many states have. (Not all, mind you; there are many places where you can enjoy delicious beef dishes.)

But is it any different in Pakistan? As I asked another Pakistani a week back, what would happen to a hindu or christian in Pakistan who drinks beer or opens a bar? Does Pakistan allow non-muslims to violate Islamic beliefs and practices? Doesn't Pakistan impose religious rules on everybody?

Personally, I would like complete separation of religion and government, people who have certain beliefs can follow them, but not force others to follow them. But one cannot pretend that India is worse than Pakistan when it comes to one religion imposing its rules on others.

There is a God , who no one knows .
Holy Men tell us about him .
They Call for the praise of God .
We end up being controlled by them .

Ah! this is the story of Intelligent Animal a.k.a Humans

 

[ayesha.a]

Those who to you are working over time for.

And who would that be? As I requested, could you be more specific, and a little less enigmatic?

 

[American Pakistani]

And who would that be? As I requested, could you be more specific, and a little less enigmatic?

No I can't, sorry.

You can use your brain to figure.

 

[Sugarcane]

My fallows making fun of this should understand that it's same as blaspheme in Pakistan. So, no need to ride on high horses unless we clear our own country from these kind of issue first.

 

[ayesha.a]

No I can't, sorry.

You can use your brain to figure.

Why, what is preventing you from being more specific? My guess is that you don't really have anything specific to say.

If you can spell out your point, I will be happy to respond. If you speak in riddles, and hint at accusations, but are unwilling or rather unable to elaborate, then I cannot see the point of responding.

 

[Kashmiri Pandit]

My fallows making fun of this should understand that it's same as blaspheme in Pakistan. So, no need to ride on high horses unless we clear our own country from these kind of issue first.

 

[ayesha.a]

G A U M A T A
A
U
M
A
T
A



Indians have already built a temple for their pet mass murderer - Modi.

And to Sonia Gandhi, and to Sachin Tendulkar, and to Amitabh Bacchan, and to Chiranjeevi. Which should tell you how important or significant that is.

They will lead similar lives until a political party decides it needs more votes and campaigns against an ethnic or religious minority. Then all hell breaks loose and Indians will be caught raping, assaulting and immolating neighbours they've lived alongside entire lives.

That has only happened once in Indian history, that a political party, for purely political reasons, committed atrocities against a particular community. That was during the anti-Sikh riots of 1984, when Congress party goons massacred some 5,000 Sikhs. Ordinary, non political Hindus, Muslims and others were all shocked and sickened by that.

In all the other religious disturbances, all political parties have taken advantage of the already existing communal hatred. And that is actually scarier - your assumed scenario of political parties stirring hatred for votes is a lot less scary that the reality, that ordinary hindus and muslims have taken up arms against their neighbours.

 

[CriticalThinker02]

First save the girls that are getting gang raped in your country dipshit than worry about your cow.

 

[Azad-Kashmiri]

New Delhi: Adding more fuel to the political slugfest over Dadri lynching, BJP MP Sakshi Maharaj has said that he is willing to kill and get killed to save cows.
“We won't tolerate insult to our mother...will die, will kill,” he said, adding that the politics going on over the issue is condemnable.

WOW! Such barbaric, savages who only know rape and killing. Only in the last thread on Hindustan there was a gang-rape of a poor woman (may Allah heal her and give her justice) and the Hindustanis were more focused on manner of divorce. This appetizers their mindset and how low they consider women.