What's new

Questions for those who opposed Afghan Jihad

The subsequent purge of officers involved in the "Jihad" resulted in the ISI to lose their leash over the NSAs. Hence they went unchecked and diverted here & there. Should have disarmed them, instead we sought to create a vassal state in order to open up links with Central Asia. At that time no one expected such a major turnaround, hence even left-leaners like Bhutto & Naseerullah Babar supported their use. If Pakistan ran the insurgency on it's own, the militants would have been easier to handle - just like what happened after '75 in Bhutto authorized op against Daoud Khan - but the effectiveness of the insurgency would be pretty weak. Keep in mind that the Soviet 40th Army did not have the capacity for overrunning Pakistan, as the well-funded insurgency bogged them down pretty well in the Afghan lands.


Can't imagine anyone in the 90s expected PA to be engaged in the WoT just a few years later - but apart from that, weapons rush and trained groups had given rise to sectarian militancy and LIC in Sindh/Karachi. So the crackdown on NSAs was necessary but only reinvigorated when PA went in '02. Foreigners were to targeted, but in process locals got antagonized and started giving resistance - eventually gaining strength due to crappy deals by pu**y generals. LM incident provided greatest boost to Takfiris - TTP formed, military & civvies became seriously disillusioned - to an extent that 211 troops of 7 Baloch surrendered to Baitullah Mehsud when ambushed. We fought back against an ideology we helped gaining military strength. Short-sightedness of planners & turn of events cost us.

Today we still use NSAs - but unlike what PTM & co. say - they're for India-centric purposes (along LC), and very few in number - mostly Punjabi/Pahari.
 
Afghanistan was always a s..thole and the Pasthun nationalist types for loy shoy Afghanistan were always a pain still a pain since American involvement I laugh at the Pakistanis thinking they Afghanistan will be brother nation when they hate us with guts but they are a pathetic country army cant win against Taliban all I hope to see is under a Taliban government I personally think their ideology sucks but no one is good or angelic there so no choice is that we get pipelines,a stable country and trade routes to Eurasia but Afghans being scrummy and always fighting makes me cautiously doubt that
Daud Khan was getting closer to Pakistan, Saudi and Western camp in general - that may have worked if Brezhnev had not supported communist coupe.
 
The subsequent purge of officers involved in the "Jihad" resulted in the ISI to lose their leash over the NSAs. Hence they went unchecked and diverted here & there. Should have disarmed them, instead we sought to create a vassal state in order to open up links with Central Asia. At that time no one expected such a major turnaround, hence even left-leaners like Bhutto & Naseerullah Babar supported their use. If Pakistan ran the insurgency on it's own, the militants would have been easier to handle - just like what happened after '75 in Bhutto authorized op against Daoud Khan - but the effectiveness of the insurgency would be pretty weak. Keep in mind that the Soviet 40th Army did not have the capacity for overrunning Pakistan, as the well-funded insurgency bogged them down pretty well in the Afghan lands.


Can't imagine anyone in the 90s expected PA to be engaged in the WoT just a few years later - but apart from that, weapons rush and trained groups had given rise to sectarian militancy and LIC in Sindh/Karachi. So the crackdown on NSAs was necessary but only reinvigorated when PA went in '02. Foreigners were to targeted, but in process locals got antagonized and started giving resistance - eventually gaining strength due to crappy deals by pu**y generals. LM incident provided greatest boost to Takfiris - TTP formed, military & civvies became seriously disillusioned - to an extent that 211 troops of 7 Baloch surrendered to Baitullah Mehsud when ambushed. We fought back against an ideology we helped gaining military strength. Short-sightedness of planners & turn of events cost us.

Today we still use NSAs - but unlike what PTM & co. say - they're for India-centric purposes (along LC), and very few in number - mostly Punjabi/Pahari.

Basically we played with poison and it burned us badly in the process does not help the Americans soon ditched us and placed the Pressler Amendment in 1990 screwing us over India may be our principal enemy but the worst neighbor we have is Afghanistan that country from our independence since 1947 always has been playing games and Afghans are scrummy people at best

Daud Khan was getting closer to Pakistan, Saudi and Western camp in general - that may have worked if Brezhnev had not supported communist coupe.

These Afghans only got close when they were getting screwed as usual but all of them be it the monarchy,Daud Khan,Communists via Khalq faction,Karzai and Ghani all said nice things about us when they were getting screwed but in reality all of these Afghans are backstabber and want to balkanize us for their crappy Pasthunistan ideas which will never happen cause of their pathetic country and army
 
Nope, The seeds were sowed in the times of Zia, its a fact that is accepted by much of respected people who studied the history of Pakistan, Musharraf was put in a difficult position under which you or anyone else would have given up , America lost 3000 people , their mainland was attacked after years ... They were like the mad Elephant that would tremble everything or everyone in its path, so Musharraf made the right decision to join them.

Now the thing is that as soon as he joined and give AQ members to America TTP starts their attack in Pakistan , what does it tell you ? They were there and just waiting for a reason for dumb people to justify their actions and that's exactly what they did ..

As for your question, Its past so there is no point in arguing and from a Probabilistic point of view one can argue that USSR might not invade Pakistan , and it just a irrational Fear Pakistan has .

The other question, Pakistan should have fought this battle and trained people inside Pakistan, while America is busy with USSR , Pakistan should have took money from them and fortify the Border , fence it etc like this we might reduce the cost of lives we pay after the Afghan war full brought inside Pakistan .
TTP was formed in 2006 3 years after Musharraf went in FATA to please USA. It wasn't USA order or pressure. His disastrous work in FATA gave birth to TTP and Pakistan faced most brutal war in history. Even those soldiers who opposed this strategy of Afghan Jihad will tell you that militants which we faced after 2001 are not those who we trained in Afghan Jihad or their Children. They all emerged when Musharraf made disastrous decisions.

And I am still waiting for your Answer on you would have dealt with USSR in Afghanistan and do you really believe that USSR would not have tried to capture Pakistan ???

USSR was called in by the Communist government in Afghanistan at the time. They had no interests in Pakistan. However, it is difficult to say how history would've been different if Pakistan did not go to war, because it was a part of the American alliance, and it received funds, weapons and training. But who knows.
The states which USSR had captured before they were called in all those states or they simply captured them ???
 
TTP was formed in 2006 3 years after Musharraf went in FATA to please USA. It wasn't USA order or pressure. His disastrous work in FATA gave birth to TTP and Pakistan faced most brutal war in history. Even those soldiers who opposed this strategy of Afghan Jihad will tell you that militants which we faced after 2001 are not those who we trained in Afghan Jihad or their Children. They all emerged when Musharraf made disastrous decisions.

And I am still waiting for your Answer on you would have dealt with USSR in Afghanistan and do you really believe that USSR would not have tried to capture Pakistan ???


The states which USSR had captured before they were called in all those states or they simply captured them ???

TTP has operated with different names, Attacks on PA and Administration starts not so long after 9/11, and TTP was just a unified body of Militants who were fighting with various small fraction or sometimes in Gangs or individuals , Either you like it or not , no one matter who was leader of Pakistan he would have bow to American Pressure including if Muhammad Ali Jinnah was the Leader, cause its either support them in Terrorism fight or be ready to bombed back to stone age, and they were not messing around back than, cause the wound was fresh and people want blood , they wanted Dead Muslims they dont care where from .
And how do you know which Militant or his kin later turn out and become TTP or JuA ? can you identify each an every single Individual militant that was trained by ISI or PA , and not just that you can follow up with their families and kids that who's kid joing AT or who's kid join TTP ? Sorry but that DUMB ..

read my post again, last two paragraph answers your queries .
 
I have few questions for those who opposed Zia Ul Haq strategy of starting Afghan Jihad and equipping Mujahideen to fight and destroy USSR.

  1. What you think we should have done ??? What would have been your plan and strategy to deal with a Super Power like USSR ???
  2. Do you really believe that USSR would have only stayed in Afghanistan and not try to capture parts of Pakistan if it would have not faced resistance and its plans would have succeeded ???
Why cant we have a no alignment policy ? We could have remain neutral
 
@HAIDER I think you hinted about this on the Liwa Zanabiyoun thread.

This might interest you brother.
 
@HAIDER I think you hinted about this on the Liwa Zanabiyoun thread.

This might interest you brother.
I provide you whole link of movie ..enjoy, watch that movie. We talk later and discuss the fall back of participation that war. Holding back Russia may be right decision, but totally wrong terms and condition and unplanned. This so called Jehad has destroyed our generations and society.
https://www1.solarmovies.co/movie/charlie-wilsons-war-10775/1-1/watching.html
@BHarwana @AgNoStiC MuSliM @waz @Mangus Ortus Novem and rest of respectable members.
 
Last edited:
I have few questions for those who opposed Zia Ul Haq strategy of starting Afghan Jihad and equipping Mujahideen to fight and destroy USSR.

  1. What you think we should have done ??? What would have been your plan and strategy to deal with a Super Power like USSR ???
  2. Do you really believe that USSR would have only stayed in Afghanistan and not try to capture parts of Pakistan if it would have not faced resistance and its plans would have succeeded ???

These are important questions, brother, which we should be asking on a regular basis to our historical revisionists in modern times.

Jazak Allahu Khairan for creating this much needed thread.

As I asked earlier, why couldn't Pakistan have been at peace with USSR and socialist Afghanistan ? About India, if the previous statement would have come true, perhaps India would have also become governed with an even more USSR-friendly government. As it is, in the 90s, the Indian government gave refuge to President Najibullah's family.

This would have led to peace between India and Pakistan.

But no, it is not for realpolitik that Zia ul Haq helped destroy Afghanistan. It was to appease the mullahs in Pakistan who wanted to wage war against the "Godless" socialists in Afghanistan which of course meant, as it always has happened, that he was helped by Western governments.

If Pakistan was destroyed, yes, then India would have peace and ability to do whatever it wants.

We Pakistanis do not take kindly to being occupied by foreign powers, you already know this. Resistance was survival.

Ideally I'd have liked the Northwest corner of India to be a corrider of peace between the two countries, linking them together. There are too many cultural similarities in that area that link the two, the Muhajirs can relate to Western UP, Pak Punjabis can relate to Indian Punjabis, Rajputs in Southern Punjab can relate to Rajasthan.

We have far more in common with Kashmiris, Pukhtoons, and Baloch.

Even I as a Punjabi Muslim can hardly relate to a Sikh Punjabi. We can speak some niceties, but I get bored as we run out of things to talk about.

Whereas my Pukhtoon relatives and friends can keep me engaged intellectually for a long time. There is more of a common culture between us.

We simply are too different from Indians to have commonalities beyond superficial greetings.

TTP was formed in 2006 3 years after Musharraf went in FATA to please USA. It wasn't USA order or pressure. His disastrous work in FATA gave birth to TTP and Pakistan faced most brutal war in history. Even those soldiers who opposed this strategy of Afghan Jihad will tell you that militants which we faced after 2001 are not those who we trained in Afghan Jihad or their Children. They all emerged when Musharraf made disastrous decisions.

And I am still waiting for your Answer on you would have dealt with USSR in Afghanistan and do you really believe that USSR would not have tried to capture Pakistan ???


The states which USSR had captured before they were called in all those states or they simply captured them ???

Exactly. Musharraf's self-destructive policies against Qabail and KPK created animosity. That animosity was used by outsiders to recruit for terrorists like TTP and JuA.

TTP has operated with different names, Attacks on PA and Administration starts not so long after 9/11, and TTP was just a unified body of Militants who were fighting with various small fraction or sometimes in Gangs or individuals , Either you like it or not , no one matter who was leader of Pakistan he would have bow to American Pressure including if Muhammad Ali Jinnah was the Leader, cause its either support them in Terrorism fight or be ready to bombed back to stone age, and they were not messing around back than, cause the wound was fresh and people want blood , they wanted Dead Muslims they dont care where from .
And how do you know which Militant or his kin later turn out and become TTP or JuA ? can you identify each an every single Individual militant that was trained by ISI or PA , and not just that you can follow up with their families and kids that who's kid joing AT or who's kid join TTP ? Sorry but that DUMB ..

read my post again, last two paragraph answers your queries .

Americans/NATO, along with Indians and later Iranians, created TTP/JuA are other groups to bring the fight to Pakistan. Remarkably, they used our own forced support for US to recruit disenfranchised and vulnerable youth to fight against 'Kuffar ally' Pakistan.

In short, they studied the rise of the Taliban and how it rose to power, then they created their own militia, which was wholly aimed at Pakistan. The same strategy was used again to create Daesh, which conveniently fit neatly all negative stereotypes West had of Islam.

Taliban and TTP clashed, they publicly distanced themselves from them, while giving them safe havens and allowing Indians and others to arm, recruit, and provide logistics for them.

Pakistan was a victim of this planning and suffered greatly. Their planners thought Pakistan will collapse and break as a nation, and relished it. However, alhamdulilah, Pakistan disproved their notions and won victories against TTP, and we worked with Taliban to attack them in Afghanistan.

Fast forward, Taliban has secured Afghanistan for us, and here some of us are trying to promote this false notion that they are the same as TTP, and even extrapolating Mujahideen of another time and place into that flawed propaganda.

Pakistanis, wake up. You are being played yet again by the same people.

I provide you whole link ..enjoy, watch that movie. We talk later.
https://www1.solarmovies.co/movie/charlie-wilsons-war-10775/1-1/watching.html

I have seen this movie when it came out. Very thought provoking.

Share your thoughts when you have time. Allah Hafiz.
 
Last edited:
My father is one of the most Anti Army guys I have seen, but even he says Zia had no other option. If USSR would have succeeded we we would have been next
 
My father is one of the most Anti Army guys I have seen, but even he says Zia had no other option. If USSR would have succeeded we we would have been next

In the beginning there was alot of outrage at Musharraf's operations in Qabaili areas and KPK, many Pukhtoons were disenfranchised with Musharrafs policies. Journalists, politicians, and social workers were abducted, beaten, threatened to leave the country. It was like he was running a witch hunt against them to please the US.

They were handing over people to the US to be sent to Guanatanamo and Bagram. Foreign religious students came under the radar, many had to leave their studies. It was a disastrous policy, and was bound to create resentment.

Our enemies simply exploited the toxic environment and discontent in the country.
 
His policy was spot on.
It is not his fault that India started making proxies spring forth from within the original mujahideen. And then the CIA jumped in as well.

Proxy warfare was around even then. Less documented/highlighted. Zia was involved in Black September in Jordan. That operation was also likely an ISIS like story orchestrated by Mossad like how Daesh today is illegitimate child of anti Islam agencies/powers. They use Daesh to infiltrate a country, give high hopes to the people and then make that country a pile of rubble.

Doval and co have already revealed what they did/do wrt proxies in Pakistan.
I have few questions for those who opposed Zia Ul Haq strategy of starting Afghan Jihad and equipping Mujahideen to fight and destroy USSR.

  1. What you think we should have done ??? What would have been your plan and strategy to deal with a Super Power like USSR ???
  2. Do you really believe that USSR would have only stayed in Afghanistan and not try to capture parts of Pakistan if it would have not faced resistance and its plans would have succeeded ???

I think OP should go ask the families of those people who lost their sons , daughters , father , mother , brothers and sister because of the wave of Extremism which was sowed by Zia ul NaHaq ..
Post Zia we got into the game of turning those proxies towards Kashmir(stellar move again by ISI which was becoming very strong, efficient and a menace for Indians). But then Benazir submitted to U.S pressure "to cut the wings of the ISI". Then the ISI was forced to abandon those proxies languishing in a state of limbo. Musharraf was final nail in coffin for these proxies.

Then India turned them against us by paying them more money, better equipment etc. They took various lashkars and jaish etc etc elements and cobbled them up together with disgruntled people of FATA/ilaka ghair. And importing some foreign fighters from Uzbekistan Islamic Movement etc. So that gave rise to TTP and all the carnage in Waziristan and all of Pakistan.

When the reins of these proxies were in Pakistan's hands no suicide bombings etc used to happen in Pakistan. It is when these elements defected all hell broke loose.

It is fashionable to bash a dictator but Zia took the right decision. If it weren't for him we would have been former Soviet state like Bulgaria, Estonia etc. Zia bashing generally comes from the divide between the libturds and uneducated extremist mullahs.

He also defended our nuclear program very well. If you put Zia in context his decisions and his contributions to Pakistan do make sense.

The subsequent purge of officers
We've lost great human resource because of spineless double agent politicians. We've lost the generation that might have gotten Kashmir back for us.

Now when we need offensive proxies against India. ISI and MI are gonna have to work really really hard to build those same capabilities, connections and networks all over again.
 
Last edited:
And let USSR capture Afghanistan ok !!! But what was the guarantee that you will not have been next ???
There was no guarantee but whats the guarantee also not a threat.

In 80s India had best relationship with USSR but it was also not the enemy of US. Why we always have to go into one camp? We are not a small country. With a population of more than 220 million we r a powerful nation
 
Back
Top Bottom