What's new

PTI threatens to block NATO supply

Leader

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 7, 2010
Messages
29,159
Reaction score
9
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
PTI may cut Nato supply line through Khyber



The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf stated on Friday the provincial government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa may cut NATO supply line passing through its jurisdiction.

“The party may cut NATO supply line passing through Khyber where it has formed government,” Dr Shireen Mazari, PTI secretary information, said, adding Imran Khan had been aiming to move an anti-drones resolution in Lower House of Parliament.

"We have already made it clear to other political groups that drone attacks inside Pakistani territory were unacceptable; we need to stop them," added Mazari, a formidable critic of US policies.

She said when “certain quarters told us that striking a drone down was beyond the mandate of the provincial government”, the PTI started considering any possibility of cutting NATO supply route through Khyber into Afghanistan.

Undoubtedly, this anti-drones approach of PTI may prove disastrous for the US and allied forces if the provincial government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa sticks to it.

Pakistan suspended Nato supply line in November 2011, angrily denouncing violation of its sovereignty after a drone strike on an army outpost killed at least 25 soldiers.

The suspension was not dropped until Obama administration made an unconditional apology to Pakistan in 2012.

Reports say the US had to incur losses of millions of dollars on air transportation of supplies to Nato forces stationed in Afghanistan.

Insiders told The Nation on Friday the Khyer Pakhtunkhwa government was seriously mulling a cut on NATO supply line if the US did not stop violating Pakistan’s sovereignty by firing drones into the Tribal Areas.

Sources added Imran Khan-led Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf was in the middle of drawing up a petition to move international human rights watchdogs against inhumane drone strikes that trampled human rights.

PTI may cut Nato supply line through Khyber


THIS !!

Naya Pakistan.... :pakistan:
 
. . . .
Nice plan. Block it. They should use other route, our roads are already in bad shape due to overloaded trucks.
 
.
Good initiative.. let's see where it goes...

Edit: Just read again the whole peace of news again, where is the threat? It's just someone is thinking something...

you were never required to read it again and again, you were required just to know that a provincial govt cannot directly call upon usa ambassador and register protest, it can only give message through media or raising voice in the parliament when its in session.

hope you understand now?
 
.
Political posturing nothing else, I don't think that a provincial government can go against the government at the center
 
. . . .
Kpk goverment is The true representative of its people, it should use all means to stop drone attacks and block all supplies for nato, if it means going against central government then be it.

People will rush to support the government, we are on the edge, army won't get involved and if it does then its another brick we have to take out to break the wall, they will get an *** whopping.

Its time all parties united against the drone issue, those who don't are complicit and enemy of pukhtoon nation.
 
.
Kpk goverment is The true representative of its people, it should use all means to stop drone attacks and block all supplies for nato, if it means going against central government then be it.

People will rush to support the government, we are on the edge, army won't get involved and if it does then its another brick we have to take out to break the wall, they will get an *** whopping.

Its time all parties united against the drone issue, those who don't are complicit and enemy of pukhtoon nation.

PA will never attack its own people.
 
. .
first engage them in short dialog if the USA deth don't agree start building pressure.stopping NATO supply and mass dharnas will increase pressure on center.also stop the withdrawing NATO supply out of Pakistan if they still don't agree.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom