What's new

Proposed Ramadan fasting restrictions reflects increasing intolerance to Christians in Pakistan, cri

Joined
Mar 23, 2017
Messages
2,028
Reaction score
-8
Country
United States
Location
India
Proposed Ramadan fasting restrictions reflects increasing intolerance to Christians in Pakistan, critics say
Lorraine Caballero 10 June, 2017 9:46 AM 0 Comments
Like Us
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter




The proposed stricter regulations on fasting during the holy Muslim month of Ramadan reflect Pakistan's increasing intolerance to Christians and other religious minorities, according to critics.

ramadan.jpg

(REUTERS / Akhtar Soomro)Fishermen sit on a fishing boat as they prepare to break their fast in Ibrahim Hyderi, on the outskirts of Karachi, Pakistan.
Last month, Pakistan's Senate Standing Committee on Religious Affairs gave the green light to an amendment on the "Respect for Ramadan" (Ehtram-e-Ramazan) bill. While the public sale and consumption of food or beverage from 4 a.m. to 7 p.m. during the fasting month is prohibited, the consequences now include physical violence and steep fines for violators, the World Watch Monitor notes.

Critics have slammed the amendment as not aligned with Islam and prejudiced toward the non-Muslims in Pakistan. In 2009, two Christian brothers were arrested under this regulation An elderly Hindu who was diabetic was also beaten by a policeman last year for eating rice in public ahead of the scheduled breaking of the fast.

"I find this law extremely hypocritical and prejudiced – not only on a social level, but also on a religious level," author Komal Ali said of the amendment. "My driver, who is a Christian, recently told me that he hadn't had lunch because all the restaurants were closed."

Anglican Bishop Peter Humphrey of Peshawar has expressed concern over the announcement that violators of the new law will be imprisoned. Rights activist Shams Shamaun called for better treatment of religious minorities during the Ramadan, and criticized the law as discriminatory.

Gujrat District Police Officer Sohail Zafar Chatta, a Muslim who lives in Punjab where a majority of Christians live, posted a statement on Facebook asking people to respect Christians' sentiments.

"Is it Ehtram-e-Ramazan, or just don't-eat-in-my-presence attitude?" another Muslim said on Facebook. "There is no compulsion in religion. Not even during Ramazan!"

In a post on Twitter, former Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto's daughter Bakhtwara said the new "ridiculous" law will cause people to die from dehydration and heatstroke. Temperatures in Pakistan have risen to more than 40 degrees since the beginning of Ramadan, ABC notes.

Pakistani rights activist Tahira Abdullah believes the amendment was passed to target religious minorities in the country, noting that all access to food and drinks are closed down during the fasting period without special consideration for non-Muslims. However, Senate Committee chairman Maulana Hamdullah denied the allegation, saying the new Ramadan law only reflects the country's establishment as an Islamic state.


http://www.christiandaily.com/artic...-christians-in-pakistan-critics-say/60597.htm
 
.
Whats the problem with people . When they recite this ayat ....deen ma koi zoor nahi... then why forced implementation of Islam. Why Taliban factors are raising in our society.


upload_2017-6-11_0-45-14.jpeg
 
.
Whether there is compulsion in religion or not this compulsion is tied with muslims and us alone. This bill was 100% suggested by a butthurt cleric who thought that if he cant eat then no one will.
 
.
Bakhtawar B**** should live in Pakistan before any making criticism about any matter.
She should avoid imposing her own occult beliefs to rest of everyone in Pakistan, while sitting abroad.
 
.
Bakhtawar B**** should live in Pakistan before any making criticism about any matter.
She should avoid imposing her own occult beliefs to rest of everyone in Pakistan, while sitting abroad.
This is one of their side businesses.cant quit!
 
. .
this bill is not against Christians or any minority. nobody is asking them to fast. but its moral obligation to not eat in front of a person who have not eaten whole day. Christians are free to eat what ever they want to but not in public . an there is nothing wrong with it as it is not Christians specific bill.
 
.
Whether there is compulsion in religion or not this compulsion is tied with muslims and us alone. This bill was 100% suggested by a butthurt cleric who thought that if he cant eat then no one will.
i guess it was glolana ashrafi ?
 
.
The unfortunate thing is, people aren't Anti-Faith (most) they're Anti-Mullahs and these Mullahs lose respect with unreasonable and unjust taqwas they put forward branded in the name of Faith due to their own insecurities and misinterpretation. However Faith then becomes less appealing because of them.

They do not contribute in positive manners. Learning the Holy Book off by heart, having a beard and wearing trousers above ankles isn't what qualifies righteousness.
 
.
this bill is not against Christians or any minority. nobody is asking them to fast. but its moral obligation to not eat in front of a person who have not eaten whole day. Christians are free to eat what ever they want to but not in public . an there is nothing wrong with it as it is not Christians specific bill.

Of course its part of public decency to not eat in publuc in Pakistan. One is supposed to respect the traditions of the place where he lives. But the problem is that there shouldn't be a law regarding this. Its simply not needed.
Have you ever seen someone eat in public ? Because I haven't.

The problem is how this law will be abused. Last week the police raided someone's HOUSE because they were eating inside. Anyone can be accused and raided under false pretenses. And since all public eating places are closed before iftar from where are the working minorities supposed, the elderly and the sick supposed to eat ?
 
.
Of course its part of public decency to not eat in publuc in Pakistan. One is supposed to respect the traditions of the place where he lives. But the problem is that there shouldn't be a law regarding this. Its simply not needed.
Have you ever seen someone eat in public ? Because I haven't.

The problem is how this law will be abused. Last week the police raided someone's HOUSE because they were eating inside. Anyone can be accused and raided under false pretenses. And since all public eating places are closed before iftar from where are the working minorities supposed, the elderly and the sick supposed to eat ?
I never seen Pakistani people eat in open in Pakistan. If they eat in hiding , who cares. But, still no one can stop them if they eat in open. Eman mazboot hota haa .... lolzz
 
.
Back
Top Bottom