Prevent India from getting Security Council seat

[Patrician]

India is all set to win a temporary seat on the United Nations (UN) Security Council.

In Tuesday's vote, five of 10 non-permanent seats will be filled. All 10 countries are elected to the two-year post and elections to the 5 seats will take place today.

India's main ambition remains a permanent seat in the Security Council. India still needs 128 votes to be formally elected, but it is confident. India will replace Japan if the elected.

Tuesday's election could produce South Africa, India and Brazil Alliance.



India set to win UNSC seat in today's elections - World News - IBNLive

Buddy Sri Lankan, this thread is about permanent seat and not temporary seat.

 

[Patrician]

Personally I feel a seat on the UNSC is relevant but not important.

India needs simply to focus on itself and the rest will follow.

Exactly. Like I always say, we just need to keep up the goog work and all the seats in the world will follow.

 

[JanjaWeed]

man.. i got to give it to s_o_c_o_m for diggin this site. being a mangalorean never came across this one before!!

 

[mokkaiboy]

Giving India permanent seat is tantamount to supporting a terrorist.

Due to Indian State terrorism in Kashmir, the region is a flash point for a nuclear war. In such a situation an irresponsible country like India does not deserve to be given a permanent seat

Statements like this shows the extent of your frustration and desperate state of mind. The nuclear war jingle is always being played by your country, not ours.
The whole world is going show their deaf ear to pakistan. I cant recount when pakistan did something trustworthy at the global level.
Your country is wasting its energy in trying to stop the unstoppable and you are doing it right from 1947. You are always adamant to be on the wrong side of history, may be allah wished it..

 

[Lankan Ranger]

70 Countries already officially supports India, But India needs the support of 128 Countries

Let’s see what happens

 

[Lankan Ranger]

UNSC

 

[kingofkings]

India's bid is backed by permanent members France, Russia and the United Kingdom. The Chinese government in Beijing has recently advocated the candidacy. Also, several countries like Bangladesh, Chile, Australia,Czech Republic, and the African Union have openly supported India's candidacy.

Though initially opposed by the Chinese due to geo-political reasons, recent history has turned China's official support for India's candidature from negative to neutral to positive, in correlation with stronger economic ties. On 11 April 2005 China announced it would support India's bid for a permanent seat, but without a veto. Although the U.S. officially does not back India's bid — for various reasons, some of which remain decidedly unclear — it has privately been eager to work with India and to support the nation (which translates to not using a veto). However Indo-American relations are currently improving from the Cold War levels of de facto derision, marked by an alliance of mutuality, recently, in March 2006, by the US President George W. Bush making a visit to India, signing a civilian nuclear power sharing programme.

Taking into account its huge population and growing economic and political clout, India is a strong contender to clinch a permanent seat. Another factor which bolsters India's candidature is the fact it has participated in several of its activities, including UN operations in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Cyprus, Cambodia, Yemen, Somalia, Rwanda , Namibia, Sinai peninsula, among others.

 

[Undivided Kashmir]

Giving India permanent seat is tantamount to supporting a terrorist.

Due to Indian State terrorism in Kashmir, the region is a flash point for a nuclear war. In such a situation an irresponsible country like India does not deserve to be given a permanent seat

This statement is kind of rich for pakistan and pakistani's to make specially when they are know for their terrorists and terrorists sancturies.

When the pakistani rulers ( Dictators and Civilian) themselves agree that they use Islamic terrorists against other countries.

 

[Trisonics]

man.. i got to give it to s_o_c_o_m for diggin this site. being a mangalorean never came across this one before!!

He left out the most important part in the title "By Pakistani Press". Check the link again.

 

[VCheng]

The other factors are there. lets see even those factors are not valid to give India a seat. There are too many bones to pick in this.

How many are going to be ready to give veto power to India ?

There are many factors ranging from Russia to Iran to China to US.


Above this club already is not worthy to exist bringing more unworthy ones making it few selected ones Vs the World.

The UNSC may be unfair, elitist, imperialist and may not be durable in its present format, and you are correct in alluding to that.

However, India will be ready over the next few decades to assert a greater role in the international arena in many ways, and one of those will be in the UNSC as a permanent member.

Having said that, India will also pay a HEAVY price to be part of that exclusive club, and that price may be too much for it to cope with.

 

[kingofkings]

The UNSC may be unfair, elitist, imperialist and may not be durable in its present format, and you are correct in alluding to that.

However, India will be ready over the next few decades to assert a greater role in the international arena in many ways, and one of those will be in the UNSC as a permanent member.

Having said that, India will also pay a HEAVY price to be part of that exclusive club, and that price may be too much for it to cope with.

Dude don't forget that we get great amount of privilege for which we pay for .

We have been such influential even during our normal status, Imagine what extent can we reach after getting der

 

[third eye]

The UNSC may be unfair, elitist, imperialist and may not be durable in its present format, and you are correct in alluding to that.

However, India will be ready over the next few decades to assert a greater role in the international arena in many ways, and one of those will be in the UNSC as a permanent member.

Having said that, India will also pay a HEAVY price to be part of that exclusive club, and that price may be too much for it to cope with.

What 'price' are you alluding to ?

Cud u pls elaborate

 

[Camdor]

What 'price' are you alluding to ?

Cud u pls elaborate

he wanted to say he is dreaming.

 

[jha]

Frankly i dont believe that this UNSC seat is going to do much good to us...We have other pressing issues to address.

 

[riju78]

Giving India permanent seat is tantamount to supporting a terrorist.

Due to Indian State terrorism in Kashmir, the region is a flash point for a nuclear war. In such a situation an irresponsible country like India does not deserve to be given a permanent seat

jana ji did u actually write all this?????
can u please enlighten us how we r irresponsible???
and as of nuclear conflict..india has no first use policy...

@socom..hats off to u for digging up this site...what would have u done without google!! but what 'paskistani paper' actually reported this?