Pregnant wife of bomber detonates vest killing own children, police during Sri Lanka raid

[Lincoln]

my question is why kill already downtrodden, be it from any religion. ISIS have not attacked any one in the west that was Al Quaida who did. ISIS only kills already oppressed Muslims or Christians in countries where they are already treated bad. How come ISIS have no love for Kashmiris! but they are willing take revenge of 50 dead muslims New Zealand mosque yet they dont feel any pain of 1000s of Kashmiris youth dead and woman raped.

Why? because according to them it's a good thing. That's their reasoning.

 

[A.P. Richelieu]

Are you older than 15?

Some of us remember an era not so long ago when muslims blowing themselves up was unheard of. This is a new phenomenon spiraling out of control and it literally makes no sense....I'm still trying to figure it out.

Btw they've killed more Muslims than non-Muslims.

Muslims have been committing war crimes by blowing themselves up for at least 30 years.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Palestinian_suicide_attacks

my question is why kill already downtrodden, be it from any religion. ISIS have not attacked any one in the west that was Al Quaida who did. ISIS only kills already oppressed Muslims or Christians in countries where they are already treated bad. How come ISIS have no love for Kashmiris! but they are willing take revenge of 50 dead muslims New Zealand mosque yet they dont feel any pain of 1000s of Kashmiris youth dead and woman raped.

Which blatantly untrue. ISIS instigates violence all over the West.
It is not organized in such a way that they order someone to do something specific.
They explain what can be done, and how to do it, and some people living
in Muslim communities respond with terrorist acts.
ISIS then may or may not claim responsibility.

 

[Knight Rider]

Every one has a different version and way to reach heaven. If what you say is the real teaching of Quran, I would say that many people are not agree with it and that is why they do suicide bombing. Bagdadi kills many and claims that he is doing what is commandment of Quran. We often see many counter claims citing Quran. Possibly, it was here version to go to heaven.

There are no different version in Islam. Nobody can reach Heaven through Shortcut. How they can agree when they dont even know Quran and dont even read Quran, these people are Khwarji. Quran teaches us how to live our life better and the creator will reward those who commit good deeds through their prayers, fasting and worshiping of the creator and avoid sins with treasures not only in this life but in the afterlife also. And ALLAH loves those Muslim people who benefits other.

 

[Pan-Islamic-Pakistan]

Muslims have been committing war crimes by blowing themselves up for at least 30 years.

Why are you highlighting only their religion?

Suicide bombing is a tactic of the weak and mostly of asymmetrical conflicts like Palestine and Kashmir. Targeting usually a large, well funded military oppressor army over a largely defenseless population.

Give them guns, then you will get a real war.

It has nothing to do with Islam, just as guns/missiles/helicopters/jets have nothing to do with Christianity.

 

[terry5]

Isis in prayer

Note direction of prayer differs .

Supposedly “muslims”

Not even basics they know says UN

Supposedly “real Muslims “

Isis: UN study finds foreign fighters in Syria 'lack basic understanding of Islam'

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...tanding-of-islam-radicalisation-a7877706.html

They didn’t even have a Quran says Isis hostage .

Muslims ??

Isis wounder fighters being treated by Israel after killing Muslims of Syria .

Isis praying towards ?

 

[Pan-Islamic-Pakistan]

Check this thread everyone for proof of Indian/Israeli involvement the recent attacks:

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/prol...-lanka-and-the-global-zionist-project.615402/

 

[Pan-Islamic-Pakistan]

The question is why the bombers partially targeted Christians if it was Buddhist extremists who had troubled Muslims.

There is a larger political game being played. Certain people will benefit, certain people will lose.

 

[A.P. Richelieu]

Why are you highlighting only their religion?

Suicide bombing is a tactic of the weak and mostly of asymmetrical conflicts like Palestine and Kashmir. Targeting usually a large, well funded military oppressor army over a largely defenseless population.

Give them guns, then you will get a real war.

It has nothing to do with Islam, just as guns/missiles/helicopters/jets have nothing to do with Christianity.

There are plenty of conflicts where a weak side does not resort to suicide bombings.
The discussion in the thread is about Muslims.
Other parties have resorted to suicide attacks, and Kamikaze pilots are wellknown.
The main difference is that the Kamikaze pilots did not commit any war crimes.

 

[Pan-Islamic-Pakistan]

There are plenty of conflicts where a weak side does not resort to suicide bombings.
The discussion in the thread is about Muslims.
Other parties have resorted to suicide attacks, and Kamikaze pilots are wellknown.
The main difference is that the Kamikaze pilots did not commit any war crimes.

Don’t get so stuck on the tactic used. Bomb, suicide bomb, missiles, knife, gun, trident, rope, anthrax, mustard gas, napalm, nukes, MOABs.

It is the act of killing civilians which is dastardly, not so much the method used.

 

[A.P. Richelieu]

Don’t get so stuck on the tactic used. Bomb, suicide bomb, missiles, knife, gun, trident, rope, anthrax, mustard gas, napalm, nukes, MOABs.

It is the act of killing civilians which is dastardly, not so much the method used.

That is not the case.
It is the act of attacking civilians when there is no military target around that is illegal.
Your method is very much important.
Palestinian war crimes have resulted in Palestinian civilians getting killed.
They would not have been killed, if the Palestinians had followed Internationally accepted treaties.

 

[Pan-Islamic-Pakistan]

It is the act of attacking civilians when there is no military target around that is illegal.

Soldiers killing soldiers is warfare, no matter the tactic.

Soldiers sign up to defend their country and die for it.

For example, American allies have used suicide attacks to target Taliban leaders. This is warfare between two hostile sides.

There is no legal or illegal when war is begun.

One side will always declare the other side to be illegal in attacking its soldiers, bases, or vehicles.

It works both ways.

 

[SIPRA]

That is not the case.
It is the act of attacking civilians when there is no military target around that is illegal.
Your method is very much important.
Palestinian war crimes have resulted in Palestinian civilians getting killed.
They would not have been killed, if the Palestinians had followed Internationally accepted treaties.

I think that you are misunderstanding him. He is right that the method is not important; target is. Since, in this case the target were innocent civilians, and that also in high numbers; therefore it is a criminal act, of the highest order and needs to be condemned, as such. It hardly matters that the assailants used suicide bombing. Had they used, for example, guns and killed as many innocent people; that would not have reduced the severity of the crime.

 

[A.P. Richelieu]

Soldiers killing soldiers is warfare, no matter the tactic.

Soldiers sign up to defend their country and die for it.

For example, American allies have used suicide attacks to target Taliban leaders. This is warfare between two hostile sides.

There is no legal or illegal when war is begun.

One side will always declare the other side to be illegal in attacking its soldiers, bases, or vehicles.

It works both ways.

Soldiers killing soldiers can still be a war crime.
Soldiers dressed in civilian clothes in order to approach an enemy will commit a war crime.
Soldiers killing POWs are committing a war crime.
Soldiers using banned weapons are committing war crimes.

To do a legal suicide attack you must be dressed in a uniform and attack soldiers.
That is Kamikazes are legal and Palestinian suicide bombers are not.

I think that you are misunderstanding him. He is right that the method is not important; target is. Since, in this case the target were innocent civilians, and that also in high numbers; therefore it is a criminal act, of the highest order and needs to be condemned, as such. It hardly matters that the assailants used suicide bombing. Had they used, for example, guns and killed as many innocent people; that would not have reduced the severity of the crime.

It is illegal to kill soldiers using perfidious methods.
It is forbidden is to attack a target which you know has no military value.
It is not forbidden to attack a target which you have reasons to believe has a military value,
even if it turns out later that it has not.

You are right that it does not matter if they blow themselves up or shoot them with guns.

 

[SIPRA]

It is illegal to kill soldiers using perfidious methods.
It is forbidden is to attack a target which you know has no military value.
It is not forbidden to attack a target which you have reasons to believe has a military value,
even if it turns out later that it has not.

You are right that it does not matter if they blow themselves up or shoot them with guns.

Yes, you are perfectly right. I agree.

 

[nahtanbob]

I blame the Sri Lankan gov, they made murder and torture the norm by their relentless war and persecution of the Tamils putting ideas into the mind of the spoilt and rich kids what was unthinkable.

the civil war ended 10 years ago. when you are going to wake up ??
@Alternatiiv I hope you see the problem before your eyes

Muslims of SL are not to blame, they are the victims of these events.

If you want to blame someone, blame the perpetrators who acted alone.

For whose interest did they do it?

Why would sons of a wealthy merchant act the day they did ? it could not be for the money

What can we do to stop a random group bombing Syria or SL?

Global Muslims are not responsible and we refuse to take the blame.

you are the first to claim credit when someone does something good
but you refuse to accept the blame when things go bad

you cannot have it both ways