What's new

Political system in China offers stability, efficiency

.
China will win US because China's political system is far better than west democracy.
 
.
It also suffers from censorship, lack of independent oversight, poor rule of law and zombie policies not suitable for its time.

A great political system does not need to constantly remind its citizens that it's great. I'm not in the habit of nuthugging everything CPC does.
 
.
A great political system does not need to constantly remind its citizens that it's great. I'm not in the habit of nuthugging everything CPC does.
So democracy is definitely not a great political system because it is almost equal to Amen in west poliiticians mouths.

Cencorship is necessary in China otherwise China will fall into chaos like western countries. The west countries can handle the chaos because so far they are rich. They will not after China defeats their industries.
 
.
A great political system does not need to constantly remind its citizens that it's great.
US and Indian governments won't say anything before lavishing some praise on their "democracy", why China can not praise her own?
 
.
It also suffers from censorship, lack of independent oversight, poor rule of law and zombie policies not suitable for its time.

A great political system does not need to constantly remind its citizens that it's great. I'm not in the habit of nuthugging everything CPC does.
Like that one in the US that is literally ruled by lunatics and incompetents for sometime. China definitely doesnt need the american style democracy that has no responsibility to any people, not the voters but politicians themselves and vested interest groups. Chinese political system maybe not the best but it suits a big complex country china better than the american "democracy" political system now.
 
.
So democracy is definitely not a great political system because it is almost equal to Amen in west poliiticians mouths.

Cencorship is necessary in China otherwise China will fall into chaos like western countries. The west countries can handle the chaos because so far they are rich. They will not after China defeats their industries.
Maybe you like these slogans? A good government doesn't need to demand obedience and doesn't need to demand gratitude all the time. This is the hallmark of an insecure political party.

1662789513596.png

1662789543816.png


The "censorship is necessary" line has been repeated to infinity for the past 30 years. Now that the economy is slowing and the real estate bubble is able to burst, let's see how much longer people will put up with this shit.
 
.
China will win US because China's political system is far better than west democracy.

Not better, but inherently superior. Basically, it is kind of limited democracy where only people who have knowledge and expertise can decide the road to the country, not unlike the system in the US hundreds years ago, where only rich white men could vote. Unfair, yes, but it is the nature of any society to be unfair, and this unfairness can be offset by the smartly selected leaders. Unlike the not so smart system in the West, where a drug addicted thug is equal to a professor or a billionaire to vote, which look fair on paper, but absolutely unfair by nature.
 
Last edited:
.
Maybe you like these slogans? A good government doesn't need to demand obedience and doesn't need to demand gratitude all the time. This is the hallmark of an insecure political party.

View attachment 877630
View attachment 877631

The "censorship is necessary" line has been repeated to infinity for the past 30 years. Now that the economy is slowing and the real estate bubble is able to burst, let's see how much longer people will put up with this shit.
The first slogan is in old folk home. Probably it is charity institution. So far the second slogan is correct. Nothing wrong. China is the major target of US propaganda weapon. Censorship is definitely necessary. Being a citizen of great country is not only about enjoying the dividend, also about more responsibilities and sacrifice.
 
Last edited:
.
Not better, but inherently superior. Basically, it is kind of limited democracy where only people who have knowledge and expertise can decide the road to the country, not unlike the system in the US hundreds years ago, where only rich white men could vote. Unfair, yes, but it is the nature of any society to be unfair, and this unfairness can be offset by the smartly selected leaders. Unlike the not so smart system in the West, where a drug addicted thug is equal to a professor or a billionaire to vote, which look far on paper, but absolutely unfair by nature.
Democracy only fits for a small group of people. People know each other. Using democracy to administrate a big country is anti logic
 
.
Democracy only fits for a small group of people. People know each other. Using democracy to administrate a big country is anti logic
Not even for a small group of people, using democracy to run a company or a factory will almost definite lead to the bankruptcy of them, different people have different priorities and their interests lie in different places.
 
.
I agree Chinese political system offers stability and efficiency.

But how about transparency? Do Chinese citizens know the details of government budgeting?
 
.
I agree Chinese political system offers stability and efficiency.

But how about transparency? Do Chinese citizens know the details of government budgeting?

Transparency depends a lot on the people and the prosperity of that very nation, not much on the system.

Singapore has basically always been a single party dictatorship by Western standard, but it is one of the cleanest in the world.

And about the transparency in Western style democracies in the world, i think we have enough examples and discussions.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom