PM refused to condemn Uri attack despite US, UK prodding

[Soumitra]

he is not condemming means two things

1. pakistan has done the attack and he supports it so wont condemn it
2. He is afraid of his position. Right now he is
   1. Facing domestic trouble because of corruption charges and Panama Papers
   2. Imran Khan is after him with the Raiwind Rally
   3. Raheel Sharif is going to retire. Nawaz has had an uneasy relation with military Genrals. Last time Mush did Kargil without taking him into confidence. Then Nawaz had to go to clinton to save his @$$ and soon afterwords he was deposed. this time he is playing it safe and just wants Raheel Sharif to go quietly and does not want to take any chances to complete his turn

 

[hanuman]

@Lahore_PAF

bhai In India there are no illegal gun markets, understand that . I know what I am saying

maximum u gan get a single shot small gun illegally in 100USD in India
but not AK 47, grenades

I accept that smuggling cud have been done by locals , but then if someone sneaks in ak47 illegaly in our country and uses it violently, shouldn we kill him ?

what will u do ??

 

[Super Falcon]

Ok even If I accept they did not happen, as per your convenience.

how do you answer about Masood Azhar bhai?

@Lahore_PAF

@Super Falcon

ok even if Uri was done by kashmiris.
how did they have grenades, ak47, military equipents with them ?

In India you cant buy these things off the shelf like Pakistan illegal gun markets

dont u see Pak envolvement there, in arming the militia ??

salman khan

what have we done to him ?
are u serious ?
we have made him biggest superstar
we are a democracy, where everybody has right to expres, even if they think salman is speaking incorrect.

Oghhhhhh

AK 47 and grenades you can buy anywhere

Do naxals don't use AK 47

AK 47 is used all over the globe in every war Syria Iraq Iran Afghanistan gulf war Georgia etc

So all those AK 47 given by Pak

Second it is easy to get AK 47 grenades pirates in middle of sea uses them do Pak army gave them

Please be logical

Even your army use AK 47 may be some Kashmiri took from your dead soldiers

Third thing Pak uses AK 47 In small numbers it is not standard issue rife of PA G. 3

rifle is not a proof that it is carried by that country

Ak 47 used in all conflicts as your logic that Russia is behind all wars

Grow up

We have also insan recovered from GHQ APS and airport attacks in Pak do you buy it

Don't use illogical questions

he is not condemming means two things

1. pakistan has done the attack and he supports it so wont condemn it
2. He is afraid of his position. Right now he is
   1. Facing domestic trouble because of corruption charges and Panama Papers
   2. Imran Khan is after him with the Raiwind Rally
   3. Raheel Sharif is going to retire. Nawaz has had an uneasy relation with military Genrals. Last time Mush did Kargil without taking him into confidence. Then Nawaz had to go to clinton to save his @$$ and soon afterwords he was deposed. this time he is playing it safe and just wants Raheel Sharif to go quietly and does not want to take any chances to complete his turn

Let's suppose we did it we did it for Kashmiri people killings

Neither you pm condemned GHQ MEHRAN APS and training school attacks so it means you guys do it do you buy our proof if we accept your soyou are the bigger terrorist than us

These are the few i named 100 more none condemn came from yo
Tit for tat answer it logically don't run

 

[hanuman]

@Super Falcon

Ok there are ak47 in naxal areas .
but thats it

however, it is almost like a illegal market of arms in Pak, I have seen youtube videos

and links between naxals and Kashmir are not that well established .

however, I must say u can get AK47 in India by naxals, but it is very very difficut .
u get caught, u die

 

[Super Falcon]

@Super Falcon

Ok there are ak47 in naxal areas .
but thats it

however, it is almost like a illegal market of arms in Pak, I have seen youtube videos

and links between naxals and Kashmir are not that well established .

however, I must say u can get AK47 in India by naxals, but it is very very difficut .
u get caught, u die

Where do naxals get those AK 47 did you know that or naxals had agreement wirh Mikhail kilashankov to supply AK 47

If pirates in middle of see get AK 47 than what an issue if kashmiris have them

ak 47 are on sale in India if you have money to buy it do india don't have corruption do india don't have smugglers stop this crap money can buy you anything just have the money

In USA there are attacks in schools with ak 47 did usa blamedPA that Pak uses AK47 Pak did it

Grow your brain

If let's suppose I buy your argument do buy my argument that attacks on our GHQ MEHRAN APS and airport are done by terrorist who used insan which is india army standard issue rifle india did it for me argument sake agree it

 

[hanuman]

@Super Falcon

bhai understand they are not for sale in India
maan lo baat

I know the things, I am a commissioned officer in a police agency in India

AK we used to get from 3-4 routes,
Myanmar- by rebels who got it from china
Bangladesh- now it has stopped
Nepal- ISI and china maoist
Kashmir


Have u heard of that case of Sanjay Dutt (actor)
he had some goon friends, he got a ak47 from them just for fun.

just because ak being found in his place he had been in and out of jail almost for 20 years

when he did not have to do anything with violence
and when his father was a high level minister of govt

 

[Soumitra]

Neither you pm condemned GHQ MEHRAN APS and training school attacks so it means you guys do it do you buy our proof if we accept your soyou are the bigger terrorist than us

Sorry Please research before you say

APS Attack - http://zeenews.india.com/news/india/pm-narendra-modi-condemns-peshawar-terror-attack_1515693.html

PNS Mehran Attack - http://dunyanews.tv/en/Pakistan/52513-PNS-Mehran-attack-matter-of-serious-concern-India

 

[hanuman]

@Super Falcon
I agree with you that if u have crores of rupees you can get what u want anywhere

but do u think that kashmiri mujahids are that rich ?
whom are u fooling ?

cmon see through things

 

[aamirzs]

Good.

 

[RealNapster]

bhai u are correct with facts .

So you agree that by providing fuel to the Indian aircraft we actually "saved" life of 100's of Indian citizen's .

 

[hanuman]

@RealNapster

fuel ?
u saved lifes ?

u are sheltering a man who got freedom from jail in exchange of lives of IC814 civilian flight hijack

do u even understand waht that means ???


u need proof of what against this man ?

 

[RealNapster]

fuel ?
u saved lifes ?

u are sheltering a man who got freedom from jail in exchange of lives of IC814 civilian flight hijack

do u even understand waht that means ???

So you actually saying that Pakistan should have refused to issue landing permission to that Indian flight carrying 100's of Indian citizens ??

In that case you would have lose 100's of Indian citizen's as a crash landing of your aircraft. and who know's if it crashed inside a Pakistani city killing 100's of more Pakistani's also ... Bcz why would an Indian pilot care about Pakistani Population when they even refuse to refuel him ?

So tell me, You still deny that Pakistan actually SAVED 100's of Pakistani and Indian citizen's by providing Fuel to that Indian aircraft which declared emergency due to low fuel ?

 

[hanuman]

@RealNapster

wah dost wah

ok u helped them
and now what are u doing with masood azhar ?

 

[GR!FF!N]

LOL..Why would they when its them who are funding,recruiting and arming these terrorists?

 

[Soumitra]

So you actually saying that Pakistan should have refused to issue landing permission to that Indian flight carrying 100's of Indian citizens ??

In that case you would have lose 100's of Indian citizen's as a crash landing of your aircraft. and who know's if it crashed inside a Pakistani city killing 100's of more Pakistani's also ... Bcz why would an Indian pilot care about Pakistani Population when they even refuse to refuel him ?

So tell me, You still deny that Pakistan actually SAVED 100's of Pakistani and Indian citizen's by providing Fuel to that Indian aircraft which declared emergency due to low fuel ?

You are intentionally confusing 2 different things.

Yes you did provide fuel to the aircraft and it saved lives. There is a report that you had closed down the airport and the pilot was landing on what he thought was the runway but was actually a highway. and the last minute Lahore ATC aked him to go around and land on the runway
No one is blaiming you for providing the fuel to the aircraft

What @hanuman is saying is what happened post the hijack. three dreaded terrorist were released after the hijack Now those terrorists are roaming in impunity in Pakistan. This is what India is blaming you for. And dont say those are innocent. No body hijacks an aircraft to secure the release of innocent people