For all the details check out the reports from case, latest hearings.
https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw10463.pdf
Summary of all :
-Karkey goes to Pakistan and awarded with a contract,
-It has been found out that some Pakistani officials were corrupted,thus all contracts are withdrawn,
-NAB investigates every contractor, karkey has been found to be clean, been paid 12m USD and allowed to leave.
-Supreme court has subjected, requested from NAB for retrieving the 120m payment from Karkey
-Karkey has been given a "no objection certificate" which clears themselves,
-Supreme court arrests some Pakistani officials,takes action against karkey and detains the ship
-Karkey applies to corresponding court (the ones which earlier stated in contract, to be applied in case of conflict) under, and ICSID to look for an international solution for the case
-Karkey is awarded with 860m USD for losses due to contract, and of holding the ships.
-Pakistan rejects by implying that Karkey has been involved in corruption and bribing, requesting back up tapes to be searched
-Karkey replies that the data requeusted by Pakistan is not accesible and its a burden
-Pakistan refers to a lebanese who has access to a document with deleted names and dates,
-Court says its unusual to refer someone who has doubtly has access and unverifiable documents with nonames and dates
-Pakistan requests lawyers,defending karkey, to check out back up tapes held by them(lawyers denies to possess those)
-Court partially accepts that, lawyers should be answering questions raised by Pakistan,yet Pakistan should clearly and narrowly adress which documents and things they desire to be discovered from either back up tapes and from lawyers.