PM asks China to back India’s bid for UNSC seat, NSG membership

[scorpionx]

Permanent seat is earned by spilling blood ，not begging

China earned that by defeating UN force in Korea peninsula，match that achievement and the seat is given

Please provide a link for the claim you are making. If spilling blood for a right cause would have been the criteria it's Taiwan that deserves the seat. Not PRC.

 

[Economic superpower]

NSG will happen with or without China. Nothing will happen in the next decade on UNSC, neither will the border dispute with China be settled, thus no reason to expect them to support our bid.

India needs to strengthen herself along with other similar nations to render UNSC less relevant. We have enough allies in the UNSC for any UN related problems.

You negotiate from a position of strength, never weakness, unless you are out of your mind that is.



No, its won by being in the right place at the right time. All P5 are those emerged victorious in WWII, save for China.

China played a major part in WW2. India haven't achieved anything geopolitically, which is why India has no role in the UNSC.

India dont deserve anything until it shows it has an independent foreign policy, an irrelevant country like India should mot even talk about UNSC.

Begging don't get you UNSC. Win a war, then come talk. Indian military has not won a war against anybody of note. It lost badly to China in 1962 just to prove how backward India truly is.

UNSC for India?.....dream on

Please provide a link for the claim you are making. If spilling blood for a right cause would have been the criteria it's Taiwan that deserves the seat. Not PRC.

It was China that defeated Japanese invasion. CPC is the ruler of China. Thus China has the UNSC seat. KMT is not ruling China thus they have no seat.

As for India in WW2, India was not even present because you didn't even have a country during that time.

 

[Shamain]

China played a major part in WW2. India haven't achieved anything geopolitically, which is why India has no role in the UNSC.

India dont deserve anything until it shows it has an independent foreign policy, an irrelevant country like India should mot even talk about UNSC.

Begging don't get you UNSC. Win a war, then come talk. Indian military has not won a war against anybody of note. It lost badly to China in 1962 just to prove how backward India truly is.

UNSC for India?.....dream on

Man india has been forecfully holding foreign terroritories, sikkim ,kashmir, entire north east, arunachel pardesh,with so much occupation how it deserves unsc seat.

She doesnt even desereved to be allowed to clean doors of unsc buildings or wipe threshold floors.

 

[Economic superpower]

he he he what a joker .... "death of 85 millon muslims"looks like your smoking some very good stuff

2002 Gujarat riots - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

here read this first

2002 Gujarat riots
Main article: 2002 Gujarat riots
On 27 February 2002 a train with several hundred passengers, including a large number of Hindu pilgrims returning from Ayodhya after a religious ceremony at the site of the demolished Babri Masjid, was burned near Godhra; about 60 people were killed In the wake of rumours that the fire was set by Muslim arsonists, anti-Muslim violence spread through Gujarat Estimates of that death toll ranged from 900 to over 2,000, with several thousand injured. The Modi government imposed a curfew in major cities, issued shoot-at-sight orders and called for the army to prevent the violence from escalating, but human rights organisations, opposition parties and some media accused the Gujarat government of taking insufficient action against the riots (to the point of condoning them). Modi's decision to move the bodies of the Kar Sevak train victims from Godhra to Ahmedabad was criticised for inflaming the violence.

In March 2008 the Supreme Court asked the state government to re-investigate nine cases from the 2002 riots (including the Gulbarg Society massacre), establishing a Special Investigation Team (SIT). In response to a petition from Zakia Jafri (widow of Ehsan Jafri, who was killed in the Gulbarg Society massacre), in April 2009 the court asked the SIT to investigate her allegation that Modi and another minister were complicit in the killings. The SIT questioned Modi in March 2010; in May, it presented to the court a report finding no evidence to substantiate the allegations. In July 2011,amicus curiae Raju Ramachandran submitted his final report to the court: contrary to the SIT position, Modi could be prosecuted based on the available evidence. The team criticised Ramachandran's report for relying on testimony fromSanjiv Bhatt, who they said fabricated the documents used as evidence. The Supreme Court gave the matter to the magistrate court, with the SIT examining Ramachandran's report. The team submitted its final report in March 2012 seeking closure of the case, with Zakia Jaffri filing a protest petition in response. In December 2013 the magistrate court rejected the protest petition, accepting the SIT's finding that there was no evidence against the chief minister

Modi's involvement in the 2002 events has continued to be debated. Several scholars have described them as a pogrom, while others have called them state terrorism. Summarising academic views on the subject, Martha Nussbaum said: "There is by now a broad consensus that the Gujarat violence was a form of ethnic cleansing, that in many ways it was premeditated, and that it was carried out with the complicity of the state government and officers of the law." In 2012Maya Kodnani, a minister in Modi's government from 2007 to 2009, was convicted of participation in the Naroda Patiya massacre during the 2002 riots. Kodnani was the first woman and the first MLA to be convicted in a Godhra-riots case. Although Modi's government had announced that it would seek the death penalty for Kodnani on appeal, in 2013 it retreated from that stance.

Several months after the riots, New York Times reporter Celia Dugger asked Modi if he wished he had handled the riots any differently. He replied that his only regret was not handling the news media better, accusing India's NDTV channel of journalistic irresponsibility

and wise guy even in most popoulated stateof UP in india there are not 85 millon muslim now im a sure you are a false flagger pakistani but also know MODS is not going to check you so its a waste of time to make u understand about the real issue yourhate towards hindus and india willneverlet you shed yourprejudice towards india or hindus so keep doing it

Wikipedia....edited by Modi's trolls. Probably edited by Modi-the-butcher himself.

Modi is globally known as a genocidal tyrant that openly exterminated muslims in his own country.

That's why that thug was banned until he became prime minister.

He slaughtered more humans than Hitler did during WW2.

Man india has been forecfully holding foreign terroritories, sikkim ,kashmir, entire north east, arunachel pardesh,with so much occupation how it deserves unsc seat.

She doesnt even desereved to be allowed to clean doors of unsc buildings or wipe threshold floors.

If India begs harder, we might agree to give them a role as the janitor at the UN.

Apart from that, India will never get UNSC as long as China is there.

They can day dream all they want.

 

[My-Analogous]

Hope the Chinese support us on this thing

China will never support India and it will hurt their national interest.

 

[45'22']

China will never support India and it will hurt their national interest.

true that

 

[Shamain]

If India begs harder, we might agree to give them a role as the janitor at the UN.

Apart from that, India will never get UNSC as long as China is there.

They can day dream all they want.

india will seize the opportunity and will then publish the news with pride. Any bit of chinese attention is taken as a prize by indians, something one learns when one looks at their govs statements issued on china and their people's point of views regarding china. So much revernace.

 

[Economic superpower]

india will seize the opportunity and will then publish the news with pride. Any bit of chinese attention is taken as a prize by indians, something one learns when one looks at their govs statements issued on china and their people's point of views regarding china. So much revernace.

They definitely worship the white man and look up to China.

I think after the 1962 humiliation, they realised China is the benchmark India has to reach. That's why when China did economic reforms, Indians followed China. Backward India always needs a teacher, West and China provides that.

 

[scorpionx]

China played a major part in WW2. India haven't achieved anything geopolitically, which is why India has no role in the UNSC.

India dont deserve anything until it shows it has an independent foreign policy, an irrelevant country like India should mot even talk about UNSC.

Begging don't get you UNSC. Win a war, then come talk. Indian military has not won a war against anybody of note. It lost badly to China in 1962 just to prove how backward India truly is.

UNSC for India?.....dream on



It was China that defeated Japanese invasion. CPC is the ruler of China. Thus China has the UNSC seat. KMT is not ruling China thus they have no seat.

As for India in WW2, India was not even present because you didn't even have a country during that time.

You and the habitual troll just beneath you (naturally though) know nothing about the history of world war II. So better I go to sleep.

 

[Economic superpower]

You and the habitual troll just beneath you (naturally though) know nothing about the history of world war II. So better I go to sleep.

Indians talking about WW2, GTFO

The only role you bums had was serving the British as slaves.

Heck, India wasn't even a country until 1947, so you had no role whatsoever.

 

[Nicky G]

China played a major part in WW2. India haven't achieved anything geopolitically, which is why India has no role in the UNSC.

India dont deserve anything until it shows it has an independent foreign policy, an irrelevant country like India should mot even talk about UNSC.

Begging don't get you UNSC. Win a war, then come talk. Indian military has not won a war against anybody of note. It lost badly to China in 1962 just to prove how backward India truly is.

UNSC for India?.....dream on

Poor joke. What's your contribution? Getting millions slaughtered?

Anyway, who you consider as deserving is so laughably irrelevant its not even funny. Deserving has nothing to do with being P5, its who ends up on the wining side.

I have little interest in trying to educate some random Chinese troll, so go bore someone else.

If you had the capacity to comprehend, you'd understand that I never even made a case for India in UNSC, but I can hardly expect adequate comprehension from the likes of you, can I?

 

[Economic superpower]

Poor joke. What's your contribution? Getting millions slaughtered?

Anyway, who you consider as deserving is so laughably irrelevant its not even funny. Deserving has nothing to do with being P5, its who ends up on the wining side.

I have little interest in trying to educate some random Chinese troll, so go bore someone else.

If you had the capacity to comprehend, you'd understand that I never even made a case for India in UNSC, but I can hardly expect adequate comprehension from the likes of you, can I?

Laughing at the millions of men and women that sacrificed their lives during WW2.

Typical classless Indian.

Unlike Indians, Chinese fought for their country sacrificing millions while you Indians begged the British to give you a country to call your own.

 

[Shamain]

They definitely worship the white man and look up to China.

I think after the 1962 humiliation, they realised China is the benchmark India has to reach. That's why when China did economic reforms, Indians followed China. Backward India always needs a teacher, West and China provides that.

Actually indians here will exhaust their lungs arguing with uabt their greatness but in the very next thread they will be found writing how india's competitor is china and how india is inching closer to that progress. Lolz, not in next 1000 year is that happening.

India will remain an underdog underperformer compared to china . Always.

 

[Nicky G]

Laughing at the millions of men and women that sacrificed their lives during WW2.

Typical classless Indian.

Unlike Indians, Chinese fought for their country sacrificing millions while you Indians begged the British to give you a country to call your own.

Considering how you phrase your attitude towards British India and those who lost their lives, I have no respect for your views. You use suppression of people as a glib debating point score and expect me to respect slaughter of your people. You are more intellectually challenged than I expected.

Go learn to have respect for others before demanding it for yourself.

Now stop quoting me as I'll ignore you anyway and go cry victim to someone who cares. I only engage with people I consider to possess bare minimum ability of comprehension, you simply don't qualify.

 

[Economic superpower]

Considering how you phrase your attitude towards British India and those who lost their lives, I have no respect for your views. You use suppression of people as a debating point and expect me to respect slaughter of your people. You are more intellectually challenged than I expected.

Go learn to have respect for others before demanding it for yourself.

Now stop quoting me as I'll ignore you anyway and go cry victim to someone who cares.

Chinese and Soviets died defending their country against invasion from fascist alliance and fought to repel the invasion with what little resources it had, but you Indians lived happily under British rule achieving nothing in WW2 and now demand UNSC.

Beg harder