PM asks China to back India’s bid for UNSC seat, NSG membership

[chhota bheem]

Same link you guys always quote.

Firstly it's not the right address, here is the real one: in.china-embassy.org/eng/ (Notice the hyphen and the correct spelling of China in the article).

Secondly, read what Wen Jiabao actually said:

"We fully understand and support the Indian aspiration to play an even bigger role in international affairs and in the UN," Premier Wen said while addressing a question at a press conference before winding up his four-day visit to India.

We support India's "aspiration" to play a greater role in the UN, which is just vague enough to mean about anything. From peacekeeping to maritime issues.

Read the OP, Modi is in China asking us to please support India's bid for a UNSC permanent seat. Why would he be doing that if China already supported India's bid?

All i asked is ,is that an official chinese embassy website in India.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

All i asked is ,is that an official chinese embassy website in India.

No, the real website address of the Chinese embassy in India is here: in.china-embassy.org/eng/ (Notice the hyphen and the correct spelling of the name of our country).

The one you linked: in.chinaembassy.org/eng (without the hyphen) is a dead site, up for sale.

Just look at the difference in professionalism between the two sites, the one you linked couldn't even spell the name of our country correctly.

 

[Sasquatch]

For NSG Pakistan must also get membership and UNSC option will be used a bargaining chip for the border issue, it's all smiles in front of the camera reality null.

 

[Shamain]

Logic? Indians have Indian logic.

Hahahah! This is their logic------->

Same link you guys always quote.

Firstly it's not the right address, here is the real one: in.china-embassy.org/eng/ (Notice the hyphen and the correct spelling of China in the article).

Secondly, read what Wen Jiabao actually said:

"We fully understand and support the Indian aspiration to play an even bigger role in international affairs and in the UN," Premier Wen said while addressing a question at a press conference before winding up his four-day visit to India.

We support India's "aspiration" to play a greater role in the UN, which is just vague enough to mean about anything. From peacekeeping to maritime issues.

Read the OP, Modi is in China asking us to please support India's bid for a UNSC permanent seat. Why would he be doing that if China already supported India's bid?

lemme tell u ,when sushma sawaraj had visited china, indians started lying and can we call it propaganda , so yea their lies started churning out and they started spreading typical false propaganda that China has agreed to vote for india's perma seat in unsc. At the same time they said China is supporting india's unsc bid by refraing to vote against it , that is not voting at all.

They would type such lies in our newspapers comments scetions, so iasked them to provide proofs. They have a newspaper or economic periodical , indian economist, which is a number one lies ridden, indian propaganda forwarding, heck such shamelessly and brazenly lying newspaper ,that words cant suffice to 'praise' it.

So when i asked indians for links they gave me link to the news report,nowhere in the whole report anywhere it was written that china is voting or abstaining to vote at all, for india's bid.

It was pure logical that as long there is an existing territorial dispute how on earth will that happen.
But iknew its all indian gibberish ,propaganda.

Now look same indians 3 months back making tall claims ,now their modi is begging China for support. Boo!!! Haha

 

[Echo_419]

Same link you guys always quote.

Firstly it's not the right address, here is the real one: in.china-embassy.org/eng/ (Notice the hyphen and the correct spelling of China in the article).

Secondly, read what Wen Jiabao actually said:

"We fully understand and support the Indian aspiration to play an even bigger role in international affairs and in the UN," Premier Wen said while addressing a question at a press conference before winding up his four-day visit to India.

We support India's "aspiration" to play a greater role in the UN, which is just vague enough to mean about anything. From peacekeeping to maritime issues.

Read the OP, Modi is in China asking us to please support India's bid for a UNSC permanent seat. Why would he be doing that if China already supported India's bid?

You are correct the Chinese leadership has never directly supported us on this matter hopefully after the border dispute is solved BTW our nations & we establish strong ties with China like other UNSC members you will provide your support on this matter

For NSG Pakistan must also get membership and UNSC option will be used a bargaining chip for the border issue, it's all smiles in front of the camera reality null.

Well for NSG you have to talk to the US not India you can't blame us for Pakistanis not getting the NSG membership its their own Fault
Think about it India does not posses the diplomatic cloud to prevent Pakistanis from entering NSG club,the only one to blame here is the incompetency of years the Pakistani govt

 

[Economic superpower]

China will pay lip service to giving India membership but behind the scenes China will make sure India doesn't get it.

 

[GURU DUTT]

China will pay lip service to giving India membership but behind the scenes China will make sure India doesn't get it.

we know that and thats why we have said it modi dosent makes statements on his own he represents india and its goverment & people

 

[Economic superpower]

we know that and thats why we have said it modi dosent makes statements on his own he represents india and its goverment & people

I doubt Modi represents the millions of muslims he has exterminated.

 

[GURU DUTT]

I doubt Modi represents the millions of muslims he has exterminated.

care to give me link where modi as per you exterminated a millon muslims and has any of the charges levied against him were found true even after 12 years of contant grilling by inidain media and NGOs and a anty modi anty BJP UPA goverment at centre whose last election manifesto had a clear promise that they will send modi behind the bars in 2008

what is china doing to uhigar muslims inits sincian province ?

or are you one of the anty india , anty hindu and anty modi pakistani flase flagger

 

[jaatram]

I doubt Modi represents the millions of muslims he has exterminated.

Yes we all know the reason why Muslim population is stagnant in India is because of Modi

 

[大汉奸柳传志]

Permanent seat is earned by spilling blood ，not begging

China earned that by defeating UN force in Korea peninsula，match that achievement and the seat is given

 

[Economic superpower]

care to give me link where modi as per you exterminated a millon muslims and has any of the charges levied against him were found true even after 12 years of contant grilling by inidain media and NGOs and a anty modi anty BJP UPA goverment at centre whose last election manifesto had a clear promise that they will send modi behind the bars in 2008

what is china doing to uhigar muslims inits sincian province ?

or are you one of the anty india , anty hindu and anty modi pakistani flase flagger

It's well known fact that Modi is a mass murdering tyrant responsible for the death of 85 million muslims in India.
That is why he was banned from entering many countries until those countries were forced to allow this tyrant to travel as he became the Indian prime minister and wanted to maintain relations with India so they had to treat him well.

It doesn't hide the fact that Modi was banned from international travel to many countries due to his orders to exterminate muslims which led to the death of 85 million muslims according to unofficial figures.

 

[GURU DUTT]

It's well known fact that Modi is a mass murdering tyrant responsible for the death of 85 million muslims in India.
That is why he was banned from entering many countries until those countries were forced to allow this tyrant to travel as he became the Indian prime minister and wanted to maintain relations with India so they had to treat him well.

It doesn't hide the fact that Modi was banned from international travel to many countries due to his orders to exterminate muslims which led to the death of 85 million muslims according to unofficial figures.

he he he what a joker .... "death of 85 millon muslims"looks like your smoking some very good stuff

2002 Gujarat riots - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

here read this first

2002 Gujarat riots
Main article: 2002 Gujarat riots
On 27 February 2002 a train with several hundred passengers, including a large number of Hindu pilgrims returning from Ayodhya after a religious ceremony at the site of the demolished Babri Masjid, was burned near Godhra; about 60 people were killed In the wake of rumours that the fire was set by Muslim arsonists, anti-Muslim violence spread through Gujarat Estimates of that death toll ranged from 900 to over 2,000, with several thousand injured. The Modi government imposed a curfew in major cities, issued shoot-at-sight orders and called for the army to prevent the violence from escalating, but human rights organisations, opposition parties and some media accused the Gujarat government of taking insufficient action against the riots (to the point of condoning them). Modi's decision to move the bodies of the Kar Sevak train victims from Godhra to Ahmedabad was criticised for inflaming the violence.

In March 2008 the Supreme Court asked the state government to re-investigate nine cases from the 2002 riots (including the Gulbarg Society massacre), establishing a Special Investigation Team (SIT). In response to a petition from Zakia Jafri (widow of Ehsan Jafri, who was killed in the Gulbarg Society massacre), in April 2009 the court asked the SIT to investigate her allegation that Modi and another minister were complicit in the killings. The SIT questioned Modi in March 2010; in May, it presented to the court a report finding no evidence to substantiate the allegations. In July 2011,amicus curiae Raju Ramachandran submitted his final report to the court: contrary to the SIT position, Modi could be prosecuted based on the available evidence. The team criticised Ramachandran's report for relying on testimony fromSanjiv Bhatt, who they said fabricated the documents used as evidence. The Supreme Court gave the matter to the magistrate court, with the SIT examining Ramachandran's report. The team submitted its final report in March 2012 seeking closure of the case, with Zakia Jaffri filing a protest petition in response. In December 2013 the magistrate court rejected the protest petition, accepting the SIT's finding that there was no evidence against the chief minister

Modi's involvement in the 2002 events has continued to be debated. Several scholars have described them as a pogrom, while others have called them state terrorism. Summarising academic views on the subject, Martha Nussbaum said: "There is by now a broad consensus that the Gujarat violence was a form of ethnic cleansing, that in many ways it was premeditated, and that it was carried out with the complicity of the state government and officers of the law." In 2012Maya Kodnani, a minister in Modi's government from 2007 to 2009, was convicted of participation in the Naroda Patiya massacre during the 2002 riots. Kodnani was the first woman and the first MLA to be convicted in a Godhra-riots case. Although Modi's government had announced that it would seek the death penalty for Kodnani on appeal, in 2013 it retreated from that stance.

Several months after the riots, New York Times reporter Celia Dugger asked Modi if he wished he had handled the riots any differently. He replied that his only regret was not handling the news media better, accusing India's NDTV channel of journalistic irresponsibility

and wise guy even in most popoulated stateof UP in india there are not 85 millon muslim now im a sure you are a false flagger pakistani but also know MODS is not going to check you so its a waste of time to make u understand about the real issue yourhate towards hindus and india willneverlet you shed yourprejudice towards india or hindus so keep doing it

 

[Fireurimagination]

India will get both with or without China's support but in due time, it will take another 15-20 years imo

 

[Nicky G]

NSG will happen with or without China. Nothing will happen in the next decade on UNSC, neither will the border dispute with China be settled, thus no reason to expect them to support our bid.

India needs to strengthen herself along with other similar nations to render UNSC less relevant. We have enough allies in the UNSC for any UN related problems.

You negotiate from a position of strength, never weakness, unless you are out of your mind that is.

Permanent seat is earned by spilling blood ，not begging

China earned that by defeating UN force in Korea peninsula，match that achievement and the seat is given

No, its won by being in the right place at the right time. All P5 are those emerged victorious in WWII, save for China.