Your missing the giant elephant in the room for the tiny fly in the corner. The issue is not the ambassador, not even who he met and evem more whether he was removed or reinstated.
Your missing the giant elephant in the room for the tiny fly in the corner. The issue is not the ambassador, not even who he met and evem more whether he was removed or reinstated.
The issue and only issue for Pakistan is that the Palestine Authority which is the legal representative of the Palestinian people which is why they had a ambassador in Pakistan in the first place issued a formal notice that in effect said -
As of now that notice still stands as the official position and policy statement of Palestine Authority. Unless and if they revoke or make another statement that supercedes this notice as far as rest of the world is concerned the bullet points above stand. Further be it noted that Palestine did this after India made a complaint. This clearly shows where Palestinian brotherhood lies. In the Ganga. I know some Pakistani's are so gone that even if Palestinian's came and said it in their face you are 'harami people' they would do a ostrich and bury their heads in the sand or make excuses for them. Please read this document if you have any doubts. It is clear, concise and leave no ambiguity.
- Kashmiri's are terrorists
- India is the victim
- Apology to India in this "struggle" and that Palestine sides with India in the Kashmir/India equation.
Okay read the excerpt below. What does Palestine Authority [PA] "support India in it's war against terrorism" mean to you? Does the PA mean the Naxalites, or the Dalit struggle, or the Khalistanis? No of course it does not. Which terrorism is PA referring to? Context. This came about after the PA ambassador was linked with the Hafiz and we know Haifz is regarded by India as supporter of Kashmiri cause. Thus unless anybody reading this extract is irredeemably dumb from the context we can read that PA is talking about India's fight against the Kashmiri's who they regard as "terrorists".
The word apology does not have to be used to convey a apology. Instead another synonym, action or sum of actions could carry greater currency then just just saying "sorreeee". Indeed actions speak louder then words. This notification came about as result of India complaning thus it is tantamount to a apology. Further the act of removing the ambassador was done to placate Indian's feelings. This act is demonstration of a aplogy.
And where have you been. Using that AK-47 you have to shoot up any poor guy that reminds you of me? Or have you been busy digging a trench in Rajasthan so that you have your "Saraswati" dream come alive?
You asked me specify and I removed extracts, piece by piece and highlighted exactly what says where. You are at liberty to do a ostrich and close your eyes to bare faced facts.
Please stop criticising one of the Ummah nations. This hurts my feelings.
