Pakistan’s economy to surpass $2 trillion by 2050

[MilSpec]

At any rate, Indians wont have to wait too long:

Pakistan economy is around 250 billion not 882.

 

[Hiptullha]

But your countries priorities are different.kashmir is some vain and strategic depth in Afg is your pain.

Kashmir is to secure water and Afghanistan is to prevent another 1971. School yourself.

 

[Abdullah S.]

Pakistan economy is around 250 billion not 882.

Report for Selected Countries and Subjects

 

[Donatello]

Not according to our resident american economic/political/military/ expert @Viper0011. His expert opinion predicts next 12 years Pakistan's economy will be at 2 trillion.

As much as idiotic you sound, there is no harm in claiming such figures when Indians can post all sort of bull crap.

P.S. With Balochistan slowly becoming more pacified, there are tons of minerals to be extracted.

 

[Always Neutral]

Pakistan’s economy to surpass $2 trillion by 2050

You can UK for that amount so stop sending illegal immigrants from Pakistan to us. Why not send us well educated people. Why only Taxi drivers?

 

[MilSpec]

Report for Selected Countries and Subjects

 

[RazorMC]

What does black consist of?

Quite a few billion USD in unaccounted money, undeclared incomes (and therefore no taxes) and money smuggled out of Pakistan via Afghanistan or through shelf corporations.

Anyhow, GDP is not a real indicator of social development or people's wealth. It just shows how much worth of goods a country produces.
If GDP had any real-world effect, there would be no poor people in the US.

 

[MilSpec]

As much as idiotic you sound, there is no harm in claiming such figures when Indians can post all sort of bull crap.

P.S. With Balochistan slowly becoming more pacified, there are tons of minerals to be extracted.

Great etiquette, I must admit...

When you are making economic predictions there must be some assumptions made for the predictions, or atleast the modelling methodology. When you predictions are coming out of thin air, and when questioned the usual response is genocide, vedic ferrari and kashmir, it says a lot about the quality of your narrative, maturity of your discourse and prevalence of simple comprehension skills.


If according to you being a think tank, solid attributes in narratives are not required for carrying out a discourse, and bull crap needs to responded with more bull crap, then more power to you as you are already furthering the cause.

Now for the risk of sounding Idiotic as per you, I did not post anything original, just reproduced something your dear brethren boasted of, now when the same words are reproduced from my account it sounds idiotic to you... what does that say about you....

 

[VelocuR]

@Asiatic Lion, congratulation.

At this moment, Pakistan's $250 Billion (GDP Nominal) + $150 billion lose in war terrorisms and weak governments.

Pakistan pay attention heavily on terrorisms while India pay attention on economy last twenty years.

 

[Nilgiri]

As per my estimate in 2034

That would need nearly 11% average nominal year on year growth for 20 years from Pakistan.

Meeting this at 2050 would mean 6% average nominal year on year growth.

Which do you think is more likely?

First let Pakistan post a solid 7%+ growth for 5 years so we can believe it is capable of such growth consistently.

 

[Abdullah S.]

Even if you insist on taking nominal GDP, we'll get there quite comfortably:

 

[chhota bheem]

Kashmir is to secure water and Afghanistan is to prevent another 1971. School yourself.

Thats why i said,priorities are different for Pakistan. I am not sure how much water you will secure with India and regarding another 71 a prosporus Pakistan has less chance of another 71.

 

[Nilgiri]

Even if you insist on taking nominal GDP, we'll get there quite comfortably:

Proof is in the pudding. Pakistan needs to undertake some major economic policy initiative and reforms to push even this "easy" 6% growth in a sustainable way given the numerous countries vying for investment and growth throughout the future now....now that the China model has shown some clear methods to achieving this on various scales.

I am not seeing the required investment in education and training now in Pakistan at the required level to plan for the basic needs in 10 years time for example. Better quality and quantity is needed.

That too growth right now in these crucial "launch" years is hovering around 4 - 4.5%.

There needs to be a swing in momentum and some sort of acceleration for a few years...backed by low inflation and stable currency to get any kind of sold launchpad for a serious projection.

 

[Indus Pakistan]

@Horus I refuse to accept these charts prepared by people sat in new York or London. I would love somebody to explain to me few things. I am not a economist but I don't need to be psychologist to know when somebody is happy and when they are sad.

My point. Raft of reports show that there is less of extreme "bones poverty" in Pakistan then India. I was in Pakistan recently and there are cars, shops are full. House prices are ridicalous there is fast food joints on every corner. Bottom line there seems to be lots of cash floating around. A friend told me Karachi keeps getting illegal economic migrants from all over including India and Bangladesh.

Now we already know Pakistan has one of the lowest registered tax payers in the world. There is no doubt about this. Everybody knows that Pakistan is world leader in non paying tax payers. Now this means that minimal amount of the economy is recored because if it was then it would be taxed. So I ask this simple question. If people don't pay tax and it therefore is not recorded how the hell do the figures drawn by suits sitting in New York make any sense?

Let us take the case of Balochistan or FATA. I bet there are less than dozen tax payers in this huge tract of the country. However we know although these areas are poor but evidently most people there are better fed than the extreme poor of India.

So can somebody please tell me about these figures. Are these based on the fraudulent records kept by our federal government according to which only 100,000 Pakistan's are liable for tax or do they honestly reflect the reality on the ground?

Because I don't think what I read matches what I see and observe.

 

[Always Neutral]

[QUOTE="

My point. Raft of reports show that there is less of extreme "bone" poverty in Pakistan then India. [/QUOTE]

WHY COMPERE WITH INDIA WHY NOT SWITZERLAND?