Sapper
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2009
- Messages
- 356
- Reaction score
- 1
Hi, the ERIEYE is a good acquisition for the PAF and looks really nice. However, I just wish the PAF had selected the Embraer 145RJ or even better the Embraer 195. These jets have more space, better range, payload, and speed. Most importantly, they would have allowed for the PAF ERIEYEs to be independent of ground processing stations, as all processing could have be done on board the plane.
Dear,
Erieye has been mounted atop three platforms as of now ... Saab340, Saab2000, and EMB145(EM-R99). These were all civilian passenger crafts and their standard seating capcities, cruise speed, ranges, and approximate flight endurance are as below
Saab-340 ---------- 37 passengers ---------- 460kph ---------- 1700km ---------- ~4 hrs
EMB-145 ----------- 44~50 passengers ----- 820kph --------- 3700km ---------- ~5 hrs
Saab-2000 -------- 50~58 passengers ----- 680kph ---------- 3600km ---------- 9.5 hrs
I think PAF made the best possible choice ... we have to optimize endurance and cut down flight costs, because we dont have a large enough country to justify EMB-145 selection based on just 140kph speed difference.
As for EM195, Saab has chosen not to use larger jet to keep costs of acquisition & operation as low as possible while providing maximum functionality onboard as well as on ground.
Regards,
Sapper