Pakistani tv anchor VS TAREK FATAH -- GUESS WHO WON

[Jackdaws]

But it wasn't an independent country as Tarek Fateh was making it out to be. It was part of the British Indian subcontinent.

ALL princely states had a special arrangement with the British Govt - this included areas where India forced accession against British wishes like Hyderabad. When the states of India and Pakistan both became free on August 15, 1947 - ALL 500+ Princely States also became free states as their agreements with the British Govt. lapsed

 

[I.R.A]

There is no need to wonder. He was a right wing lunatic who believed he was serving the cause of the nation - for him the catalyst was Gandhi going on a fast to give 55 crores that Pakistan was begging for. And for this highly treasonous act, he was hanged. Was he right to be angry at Gandhi for this? For sure. Was he right to take a life because he was angry? No.

There is a very strong need to wonder. The hidden extremist side existed long before world was made to believe who are extremists, all the while ignoring the real extremists.

Pakistan begged , don't make it sound like india owned it.

Killing the founding father for hate well tells a lot. And nation is still confused whether to call him a traitor and accept Gandhi as Father of the nation.

Now compare that to someone like a Hafeez Saeed or Sahaluddin - despite being murderers and one of them being a UN sanctioned terrorist - they enjoy the patronage of a nation-state.

Don't insult freedom fighters by comparing them with an extremist and killer like Godse.

If Pakistan is clear on anything - it seems it is clear on it worshiping everything Indian - founding father is a Gujarati, national language is from Central India, national poet is grandson of Kashmiri Pandits, missiles are named after foreign invaders...lol...is there anything from within Pakistan you actually celebrate and cherish?

What sort of an idiot would believe what you have written just above, I think a modi indian only .

 

[Jackdaws]

There is a very strong need to wonder. The hidden extremist side existed long before world was made to believe who are extremists, all the while ignoring the real extremists.

Pakistan begged , don't make it sound like india owned it.

Killing the founding father for hate well tells a lot. And nation is still confused whether to call him a traitor and accept Gandhi as Father of the nation.



Don't insult freedom fighters by comparing them with an extremist and killer like Godse.



What sort of an idiot would believe what you have written just above, I think a modi indian only .

LOL - I can understand your confusion. For a country which hangs Prime Ministers, allows American citizens who kill your citizens after paying "blood money" - it is completely understandable why you would consider the likes of Hafiz Saeed as "freedom fighters". And the world is not naive - they know who the extremists are. A lot of popular leaders around the world have been assassinated by right wing whackos - next you will be saying the guy who killed Yitzak Rabin, JFK and Martin Luther King Jr are considered "heroes". LOL.

 

[Mentee]

He was twice imprisoned must've happened something really bad in the jail and that too 2 times! ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
@Mentee @Zibago @django

Hold on there Our forces are no pedo sandy, eda ay Katrina Kaif

 

[The Sandman]

Hold on there Our forces are no pedo sandy, eda ay Katrina Kaif

It must've been police and who knows it could be other cell inmates too m8 and you know sometimes they use these too!

 

[I.R.A]

LOL - I can understand your confusion. For a country which hangs Prime Ministers, allows American citizens who kill your citizens after paying "blood money" - it is completely understandable why you would consider the likes of Hafiz Saeed as "freedom fighters". And the world is not naive - they know who the extremists are. A lot of popular leaders around the world have been assassinated by right wing whackos - next you will be saying the guy who killed Yitzak Rabin, JFK and Martin Luther King Jr are considered "heroes". LOL.

If Nathuram can be considered a hero and worshiped, if a mass murderer can become a prime minister, if mother Teresa can become controversial and hated then what is left there to understand? Someone from a country where your skin color can land you in trouble, talking about extremism well

A nation that is confused whether to call Gandhi father of the nation or not, still worships the killer of their nation's father, hardly has any moral grounds to tell me who is hero and who is not. Too bad I don't buy the propaganda which modi indians live and breath.

And which world are you talking about? Does this world include Chinese? Turks? Arabs? Sri Lanka? Russians? Iranians? Africans? Pakistanis themselves? That is the most of the world population, now exclude the ones who give a fck about india and Pakistan, the remaining is mostly one billion indians, you do know world is bigger than modi's india right?

 

[Jackdaws]

If Nathuram can be considered a hero and worshiped, if a mass murderer can become a prime minister, if mother Teresa can become controversial and hated then what is left there to understand? Someone from a country where your skin color can land you in trouble, talking about extremism well

A nation that is confused whether to call Gandhi father of the nation or not, still worships the killer of their nation's father, hardly has any moral grounds to tell me who is hero and who is not. Too bad I don't buy the propaganda which modi indians live and breath.

And which world are you talking about? Does this world include Chinese? Turks? Arabs? Sri Lanka? Russians? Iranians? Africans? Pakistanis themselves? That is the most of the world population, now exclude the ones who give a fck about india and Pakistan, the remaining is mostly one billion indians, you do know world is bigger than modi's india right?

LOL - this is what happens when you are educated in madrassas and not in real schools. Gandhi is the Father of the Nation - last I checked, it is his face on the currency, it is his statues which adorn the nation - not those of Godse. LOL - sure let's talk about your new political masters - the Chinese. Isn't Mao your God and the Chinese national icon - despite the Cultural Revolution and The Great Leap Forward? LOL. But in a country where the killer of a Governor who stands up for minorities is showered with rose petals, I can't expect much else. A country without a democratic history would not understand that every historical figure can be scrutinized and debated upon. LOL. No wonder guys like Tarek Fatah have to seek refuge overseas.

 

[I.R.A]

LOL - this is what happens when you are educated in madrassas and not in real schools. Gandhi is the Father of the Nation - last I checked, it is his face on the currency, it is his statues which adorn the nation - not those of Godse. LOL - sure let's talk about your new political masters - the Chinese. Isn't Mao your God and the Chinese national icon - despite the Cultural Revolution and The Great Leap Forward? LOL. But in a country where the killer of a Governor who stands up for minorities is showered with rose petals, I can't expect much else. A country without a democratic history would not understand that every historical figure can be scrutinized and debated upon. LOL. No wonder guys like Tarek Fatah have to seek refuge overseas.

Can't you phrase your sentences without this LOL at the start? I mean it makes this madrassa educated difficult in understanding you, if you are using it because you are nervous and loosing cool and your control, then no problem.

Now coming to your utter nonsense and sheer ignorance, read this you may have skipped it in your schools but probably us madrassa graduates know more about your country's constitution ......... or simply may be we are better at reading.

According to reports, when a demand to confer the title of 'Father of the Indian Constitution' on Dr Ambedkar was made, deputy prime minister LK Advani, in a letter to Delhi chief minister Sheila Dikshit in 2004, had written: "It is not, however, feasible to formally confer the title of 'Father of Indian Constitution' on Dr Ambedkar, since Article 18 (1) of the Constitution specifically provides that "no title, not being a military or academic distinction, shall be conferred by the state."

Advani further said: "I may clarify that although Mahatma Gandhi is popularly known as "Father of the Nation," no such title was ever formally conferred on him by the government."

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...ion-title-Government/articleshow/16961980.cms

The rest of your blah blah is irrelevant. Bring me the proof of the world you were referring to.

 

[Jackdaws]

Can't you phrase your sentences without this LOL at the start? I mean it makes this madrassa educated difficult in understanding you, if you are using it because you are nervous and loosing cool and your control, then no problem.

Now coming to your utter nonsense and sheer ignorance, read this you may have skipped it in your schools but probably us madrassa graduates know more about your country's constitution ......... or simply may be we are better at reading.



http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...ion-title-Government/articleshow/16961980.cms

The rest of your blah blah is irrelevant. Bring me the proof of the world you were referring to.

LOL. LOL. You amuse me. It is spelled "losing"; but then as you quite rightly pointed out, I must not expect much from a madrassa educated individual. When did I say that the "Father of the Nation" was a formal title? Just like Gandhi is considered "The Father of the Nation", Dr. Ambedkar is considered "The Father of the Indian Constitution". But I can see why the confusion in your mind. You want proof of what? The Great Leap Forward? Haha. Considering you didn't have a constitution for the longest time or it is routinely suspended after military coups - does the suspension of your Constitution mean that Jinnah is suspended from being "Quaid-e-Azam" - assuming he is accorded that title in the Constitution. If he is not, then I guess he is not the Quaid-e-Azam according to your argument. Now amuse me with some more rants.

 

[Umair Nawaz]

So Tarekh Fateh isn't a Baloch? Hmmm....He must be a Martian then!

he aint an ethnic baloch, he is a mahajir.

I assume you addressed me.

Can you please point out exactly where have I made any observation about my qualifications, employment history and/or the magnitude of my paycheck or the lack thereof ....?
Feel free to not limit yourself to the "Members Introduction" section. Do crawl through PDF in it's entirety if you have to.

Kindly stop emulating your idols (that would be Lal Topi, Riaz Haq and their ilk) and substantiate your statements.

You look like a fool otherwise, much like your idols... praised and lauded by other fools but fools nonetheless.

PS: It doesn't hurt to fix your grammar and make it easy for folks who take the pain of actually going through the stuff you've written.

Cheers!

it wasnt addressed too u, u skinny moron!

 

[django]

He was twice imprisoned must've happened something really bad in the jail and that too 2 times! ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
@Mentee @Zibago @django

I am opposed to torture yet in the case of Fateh the gustaf e rasool I will turn a blind eye, even back in those days he used to spread anti state propaganda, ISI takes such things very seriously, hence the consequences.Kudos

 

[I.R.A]

LOL. LOL. You amuse me. It is spelled "losing"; but then as you quite rightly pointed out, I must not expect much from a madrassa educated individual. When did I say that the "Father of the Nation" was a formal title? Just like Gandhi is considered "The Father of the Nation", Dr. Ambedkar is considered "The Father of the Indian Constitution". But I can see why the confusion in your mind. You want proof of what? The Great Leap Forward? Haha. Considering you didn't have a constitution for the longest time or it is routinely suspended after military coups - does the suspension of your Constitution mean that Jinnah is suspended from being "Quaid-e-Azam" - assuming he is accorded that title in the Constitution. If he is not, then I guess he is not the Quaid-e-Azam according to your argument. Now amuse me with some more rants.

You are not worth my time. I thought you would prove better than other modi indians, would come up with something challenging, would make me feel challenged but alas all you could do is LOL LOL, some chicken sh*t sentence and pointed out a typo error to prove something. Petty ...............

 

[banvanaxl]

it wasnt addressed too u, u skinny moron!

o


lol funnily these indians project themselves as a very intellectually mature and high standards of education.....Rather in reality, this is their true worth and educational standard, ie only those who lick their behind are ''educated, articulate and erudite'' as this indian describes them.
While on the other hand threads like these r opened in our forum by this guy.........

https://defence.pk/threads/of-ghost-schools-and-miseducation-in-pakistan.410109/


And do u know guys whats more funny? In his members introduction thread he described himself as a person who is enough qualified to be working in an indian Multinational company and earning a decent paycheck as a result, meaning he is an ''educated, articulate and erudite'' himself or thinks of himself.

Hilarious isnt!!!!!!! @RiazHaq

But Of course you addressed me you old goat ..

But I do understand your pressing need to disown your comment now .. No one likes to be *****-whipped

Running away afterall is a tried tested and "bested" formulae for you and your ilk .. you do that rather well ..

Lesson of the day. -- Do not mess with your betters

 

[Umair Nawaz]

But Of course you addressed me you old goat ..

But I do understand your pressing need to disown your comment now .. No one likes to be *****-whipped

Running away afterall is a tried tested and "bested" formulae for you and your ilk .. you do that rather well ..

Lesson of the day. -- Do not mess with your betters

idiot! read the bloody post again!

 

[Jackdaws]

You are not worth my time. I thought you would prove better than other modi indians, would come up with something challenging, would make me feel challenged but alas all you could do is LOL LOL, some chicken sh*t sentence and pointed out a typo error to prove something. Petty ...............

It's ok - I realize you are not armed with facts and if you can't dispute facts you can merely resort to name calling. Let me know if and when you have any facts.