What's new

Pakistani PM Imran Khan Interview with Fox News

He was not he explained so well that we don't need another conflict in our neighbourhood.

He was asked about nukes for Iran and he brushed it off "I can't say about nukes" or something. I can understand wanting to maintain good relations with Iran but it's clear they want nukes he should've found a way of saying that. Something like "With the withdrawal of US from nuclear deal Iran will likely be looking to undo their end. We, Pakistan, would be willing to help negotiate a new better deal between the two countries if asked. Less nuclear weapons the better."

The people who went with him should've thought of this and come up with a much better response than what he gave in my opinion.
 
.
Trump whole policy and goals revolve around u.s coming elections,he wants face saving and artificial victory to win elections.His all measures were only limited to talks with no practical implementation at ground level like he met nkorea leader multiple times and falsely claimed that he has reached the deal but neither he has reemoved sanctions from nkorea nor nkorea stopped nuclear and missile development.I think same will happen with afghanistan problem

I agree we should not treat this as a pre mature victory we gotta be careful I understand your concerns brother but DPRK is different from the badlands of Afghanistan,The DMZ is nothing compared to mountainous and remote areas of Afghanistan America will have to eventually leave not just of Pakistan and the Taliban but China and Russia finally getting ground there we must be patient and level headed
 
.
He was asked about nukes for Iran and he brushed it off "I can't say about nukes" or something. I can understand wanting to maintain good relations with Iran but it's clear they want nukes he should've found a way of saying that. Something like "With the withdrawal of US from nuclear deal Iran will likely be looking to undo their end. We, Pakistan, would be willing to help negotiate a new better deal between the two countries if asked. Less nuclear weapons the better."

The people who went with him should've thought of this and come up with a much better response than what he gave in my opinion.

I think it was an ok answer. Clearly IK wanted to ignore the question. In other words, don't want to interfere in Iranian issues.
 
.
He was asked about nukes for Iran and he brushed it off "I can't say about nukes" or something. I can understand wanting to maintain good relations with Iran but it's clear they want nukes he should've found a way of saying that. Something like "With the withdrawal of US from nuclear deal Iran will likely be looking to undo their end. We, Pakistan, would be willing to help negotiate a new better deal between the two countries if asked. Less nuclear weapons the better."

The people who went with him should've thought of this and come up with a much better response than what he gave in my opinion.
Again that was internal matter of Iran. And what can we say, that do they or do they not want nukes ....?

If Imran sides with Iran and said ' US should value the nuclear deal and stuff' ...? Then usa would be angry .
If Imran sides with usa and said that he support usa and play on their fears of Iran, then he would have made Iran angry which would directly send proxies in Pakistan .
He could only play coy. He did wonderfully by not answering it and telling that Pakistan doesn't want another conflict in neighbourhood .
There is no different answer to this question asked .
 
.
He was asked about nukes for Iran and he brushed it off "I can't say about nukes" or something. I can understand wanting to maintain good relations with Iran but it's clear they want nukes he should've found a way of saying that. Something like "With the withdrawal of US from nuclear deal Iran will likely be looking to undo their end. We, Pakistan, would be willing to help negotiate a new better deal between the two countries if asked. Less nuclear weapons the better."

The people who went with him should've thought of this and come up with a much better response than what he gave in my opinion.

It was a fastball question I agree the MSM this morning and afternoon before the press conference was gung ho on the 17 spies apprehanded in Tehran and the seizure of British Tankers again a misstep next time IK gotta be careful what he says to western and American MSM journalists I know when he was a cricketer getting into politics in the early days but this is different he is a head of state of 200 million people with nuclear war heads must be careful and prepared when questions like this occur
 
.
Again that was internal matter of Iran. And what can we say do they or do they not wnat nukes ....
If Imran sides with Iran and said US should value the nuclear deal ... Then usa would be angry?
If Imran sides usa and said that he support usa and play on their fears of Iran then he would have made Iran angry which would directly send roxies in Pakistan .
He could only play coy. He did wonderfully by not answering it and telling that Pakistan doesn't want another conflict in neighbourhood .
There is no differenr answer to this question asked .

Pakistan shouldn't care about making Iran angry he's there for Pakistan's interests and right now talking about Iran's nukes would be one way of getting public support, and he's not lying. But he's just discussing it with a news anchor so it doesn't effect the policies discussed.

Lets agree to disagree I think he could've handled it better and the obvious sign of that is he resorted to "I don't know much about that"

It was a fastball question I agree the MSM this morning and afternoon before the press conference was gung ho on the 17 spies apprehanded in Tehran and the seizure of British Tankers again a misstep next time IK gotta be careful what he says to western and American MSM journalists I know when he was a cricketer getting into politics in the early days but this is different he is a head of state of 200 million people with nuclear war heads must be careful and prepared when questions like this occur

Ya I just think it was easy points to score with American public seeing how they view Iran. With Pakistan "siding" with US even though he'd only be telling the truth wouldn't hurt the image of Pakistan in US.
 
. .
for hindu worshipers( who worshiped him) Trump turned out to be the dildo bagvaan.
They already have that bhagwan named Lingham.
LFhDqYW69uQr8nNr5
 
. .
He was asked about nukes for Iran and he brushed it off "I can't say about nukes" or something. I can understand wanting to maintain good relations with Iran but it's clear they want nukes he should've found a way of saying that. Something like "With the withdrawal of US from nuclear deal Iran will likely be looking to undo their end. We, Pakistan, would be willing to help negotiate a new better deal between the two countries if asked. Less nuclear weapons the better."

The people who went with him should've thought of this and come up with a much better response than what he gave in my opinion.

What should have been the answer? Look perfectly fine. No one in Pakistan want Iran to have nuclear weapons, apart from few minion ayutallas who's loyality towards Pakistan are in question anyway.
 
.
very good interview, it covered almost all the aspects, upon the question of Shakil Afridi, IK put forward the idea of swapping it with Afia Sidiqqui, now i have a question to serious members, Shakil Afridi was solving the purpose of America and they are there to protect him, he is not there citizen nor a regular military officer but he was just their intelligence asset to serve them so for them it is logical to protect their serving asset .... but what are the services of Afia sidiqui for pakistan?????
 
. .
Afia sidiqui for pakistan?????
She is daughter of Pakistan apparently. Her service to Pakistan are many. First amongst many she propogated jihad against USA on behalf of Pakistan. She fought for the ummah on behalf of Pakistan. And she did all this for free or being ordered by Pakistani government.

*The reason why American's are so adament about Dr. Afridi is very simple. It is nothing about the person but about USA being seen that it looks after anybody who helps America. By doing this the message is sent across the globe so next time USA is some place and they need help, they will get volunteers because they know if shit hits the fan America will come for them.
 
.
She is daughter of Pakistan apparently. Her service to Pakistan are many. First amongst many she propogated jihad against USA on behalf of Pakistan. She fought for the ummah on belaf of Pakistan. And she did all this for free or being ordered by Pakistani government.

*The reason why American's are so adament about Dr. Afridi is very simple. It is nothing about the person but about USA being seen that it looks after anybody who helps America. By doing this the message is sent across the globe so next time USA is some place and they need help, they will get volunteers because they know if shit hits the fan America will come for them.
sir, i kindly wanna know your idea about the lady exploded her self infront of DI khan hospital day before yesterday?? and killed our police officers and civilians ????
and by the way, have you ever listened some statement from her brother??? who is working as a architect in Huston Texas? her sister was working in sinai hospital Baltimore and she was teaching in John Hopkins university too later due to Afia case she came back to pakistan. so i did not find any of her achievement for islam, if you have such record please share with us so thati can correct my self too .. .since i respect all logical things ... thanks
 
.
She is daughter of Pakistan apparently. Her service to Pakistan are many. First amongst many she propogated jihad against USA on behalf of Pakistan. She fought for the ummah on behalf of Pakistan. And she did all this for free or being ordered by Pakistani government.

*The reason why American's are so adament about Dr. Afridi is very simple. It is nothing about the person but about USA being seen that it looks after anybody who helps America. By doing this the message is sent across the globe so next time USA is some place and they need help, they will get volunteers because they know if shit hits the fan America will come for them.
Her return as a neutered woman will also quell a lot of extremism in Pakistan. As long as she is kept locked away like our lal masjid chap and people like the pen di siri are kept quiet during her return.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom