What's new

Pakistani Militry knows India is preparing for a war - Haroon Rasheed

There are no grounds on which Pakistan would claim a victory of 1971 war. I wonder if you never asked this question to a Pakistani before.

Nope, I have seen 100's Pakistani's reply and none of theirs matched yours! Anyways lets rest this!

You are incorrect in your assessment that Pakistan wants to resolve Kashmir ASAP, but India after gaining this financial power and a regional recognition is desperate to change its status for ever. But on ground, despite this wish on part of India, Kashmir is going on an opposite route. The freedom movement is flourishing and thriving again.

Ha ha ha.... There was never ever a freedom movement! It is always Pakistan's proxy war alone! Learn neutral views... Not Pakistani, not Indian.

If Pakistan was not desperate, they would have gone with the last NSA meeting and organised Kashmir issue on the next meetings agenda! So impatient!

If you don't want friendship & peace ... then you leave one with no choice to defend its self which one can always remember that and never think to big of your self because you might find your self by your self & hurt in the end.

If Peace can only be achieved by surrendering Kashmir to Pakistan.... Then sorry we don't want peace.

Friendship.... not an apt word in the context of Indo-Pak relationship!

India is okay with the status-quo where as for Pakistan it isn't!
 
.
Ha ha ha.... There was never ever a freedom movement!

We lack a commonality to discuss this aspect further. To me, to Kashmiris and many in India, there is something going on in Kashmir without Pakistan's support - its called war of libation - something similar that Gandhi Jee fought for India.
 
.
We lack a commonality to discuss this aspect further. To me, to Kashmiris and many in India, there is something going on in Kashmir without Pakistan's support - its called war of libation - something similar that Gandhi Jee fought for India.

Back it up!

Here I go! Neither Indian nor Pakistani!

BBC NEWS | Voices from Kashmir

So according to your argument, What was going on till 1989? What happened in 1989? And how there is a sudden surge in early 1990's? Time for introspection!

Why does Kashmir's turn to vote higher than rest of India even after the cry from separatists to boycott? Don't trust me... Trust neutral sources!

In addition to that... if it is just Kashmiri's and Indian's, what is the need for Pakistan to intervene? Why do you worry so much and risk a nuclear confrontation? Ain't that funny?

Baloch also fight for independence.... Does India intervene openly? Nope.. It is your internal matter! Like wise it is our internal matter!
 
.
Back it up!

Here I go! Neither Indian nor Pakistani!

BBC NEWS | Voices from Kashmir

So according to your argument, What was going on till 1989? What happened in 1989? And how there is a sudden surge in early 1990's? Time for introspection!

Why does Kashmir's turn to vote higher than rest of India even after the cry from separatists? Don't trust me... Trust neutral sources!

A sponsored resistance must had died when Pakistan pulled its backing in Musharaf Era. Its 4th generation who is born under Indian flag, listening to wande-e-matram yet refusing to accept begin Indian. Do you know what happens on 15th August there in Kashmir?
 
.
A sponsored resistance must had died when Pakistan pulled its backing in Musharaf Era. Its 4th generation who is born under Indian flag, listening to wande-e-matram yet refusing to accept begin Indian. Do you know what happens on 15th August there in Kashmir?

Pakistan has very active participation is pushing of terrorist to India!

Young Indian's.... Hum read this! Not very old article!

BBC NEWS | South Asia | Changing priorities

The only spoil sport is Pakistan! In 15th August, Pakistan backed separatists are at work!

Again I am saying.... back up your claims!
 
.
By your way of talking you have no point to give at all just bursting out this is your lvl of patience and u speak of defence related strategic issues are u in some high post of military that u know what will happen if a war happens yes and in what u hindus believe is good for you that's why u are also only seen in majority in india and have no other nation and there are 60 muslims states and in other countries where there aren't any muslims ppl are converting to Islam and plz when you don't know about Islam much so don't tell me to watch documentry about my Prophet (SAW)
and
if by your definition Islam is for whoremongers than your's is just made up of rocks and your religion is more into lust things like teaching kamasutra this is your religion it explains why hinduism is not spreading

Hahaha:lol::lol:. Looks like I hit a nerve. Agreed I am not some defence expert, but neither are you.

Multiplying like a virus doesn't really mean your religion is spreading. You are simply increasing you numbers by breeding and not by attracting people from other religions. :disagree::disagree:

Yes our Gods are made up of rocks, because we hindus think that we need some personification of a power whose form cannot be determined so that we can relate our god to ourselves. And muslims also do some form of idol worship too. If that's not the case then why all muslims pray in the direction of Mecca??:coffee::coffee:

About kamasutra, Do muslims have sexx only for breeding?? Or there is some fun purposes involved too??:enjoy::enjoy: Our ancestors happened to document the ways sexx can be enjoyed. If you got any problems then simply don't have sexx in positions mentioned in them. Make your own Islamic positions, Oh but u can't now, since prophet mohammad was the last prophet and he did not mentioned the ways sexx can be enjoyed, it simply cannot be written now. Although muslims can marry underage preteen girls since their prophet(sick pedo) married a 5 year old girl:hitwall::hitwall:. Hence muslims should have sexx only for breeding.

A word of advice, if you want others to respect your religion, try to respect others religion too. I didn't want to insult your prophet but you forced me to. Insult of your prophet is all on you.
 
Last edited:
.
we can digest your 110 neuclear warhead but you will finish with just 50. got it.

can you tell me more than 50 cities of pakistan.
watch pogo kid. Forums not your field.
 

Attachments

  • 1440529090369.jpg
    1440529090369.jpg
    16.9 KB · Views: 20
.
First of all, India doesn't possess thermonuclear weapons, they are interested in it, and so is Pakistan. If India develops it, following policy of minimum deterrence Pakistan would follow suit. You people nuclearized this region in the first place, you started it, we didn't.
Secondly, 120 nukes of Pakistan are more than enough to wipe India off the map atleast 10 times over, no anti ballistic missile system will have a reasonable reaction time in the context of subcontinent, since both neighbours are located at a stone throwing distance, before your system is ready, Pakistan's missiles would have already hit their targets. Shaheen III covers 2750km, brings entire India along with Andaman and Nicobar islands into our hitting range, plus an assortment of other ballistic missiles , Pakistan possesses Babur cruise missiles which possess thrice the range of your Brahmos, along with that Pakistan Airforce possess Air Launched Cruise Missiles Ra'ad which would also be used to deliver Nukes if need arises. Pakistan wants peace in this region, the radical former RSS lunatic, sitting at the helm of affairs in your country , is more than welcome to try to coerce Pakistan, but the reaction would be swift, massive and unbearable for you guys, it will by all means never be a limited war, which your politicians and planners (in the state of a Modi Orgasm) are anticipating !!!
I DON't know from where did you get this but let me tell you some things and will try to eradicate your day dreaming.

Firat of all
India has already acknowledged that India will have its first thermonuclear missiles from mid 2015 from a site situated in southern state in Mysore.
And even Russian side has acknowledged that yesterday there was a article quoting russian officials sating that Indian side is just on the brisk of making H bomb.

Now coming to pakistan -
Do you even know how much research is needed in thermonuclear bombs?
How many years of research is required?

So keep dreaming for your H bomb.

Now coming to your reaction time in nuclear war-
India has GSAT series satellites which are used for BMD. These satellites do reconnaissance, real time search, high sensitive activities and for intelligence.
GSAT series keep real time eye on are around 6000km range for high sensitive activities means it will alert is even if you are moving your BM from one place to another so in a war we will get be getting these information if you are trying to to even transport or move your BM in war scenario let alone the signature of your BM so our BMD will be ready even before you have launched BM so that negates your reaction time issue.

Just having missiles with higher ranges does not mean you have won the war it should hit the target so that it is useful but because oF BMD I can't see they can hit their target.
Genious if you are not updated then let me tell you India possess two types of Cruise missiles one is supersonic Cruise missile Bramhos( which you mentioned) and other one is NIRBHAY( which you missed) which has more range than your Cruise Missile by more than 300 kilometers. So be updated.

In order to deliver nukes on Indian cities you need to pass the border. Any aircrafts just can't appear on the other side of the border like that and start bombing indian cities.
In a nuclear war Indian borders will be guarded by MKI so good luck in engaging them which will be equipped with nuclear tipped missiles and bramhos and after taking care of your front line fighters which are very leas in numbers then Indian mirage which are specially for nuclear programmed will take over to deliver its duty along with MKI so good luck on taking nuclear attacks by two fighters on your land.

What you are missing that when the first nuked missile will be fired from Pakistan to get destroyed by our BMD, you will be given response from 3 dimensional nuclear attack which you don't have and after getting response from 3 dimensional for even one minute will make sure that Pakistan is not on work map.

You are missing the capability of Indias land based nuclear weapons.
India's Agni series BMs are worlds finest and also we will be possessing MIRVS in 2016- 17 which will make our AGNI series even more potent.
Just imagine a Agni series BM with 4 MIRVs is launched on Pakistan and one nuclear load is dislodged on Karachi, other one Lahore, third one on Islamabad and other one on Islamabad.
Imagine what one Agni series missile with MIRV capabilty can do to your pakistan.
Let alone nuclear strikes from other resources.

So think twice before going nuke.
 
Last edited:
.
I think neither of the two can really afford a war. Bharat may be a rich country but still it is not rich enough to afford a war. Despite remarkable victory in the war of 1971, Bharati economy suffered irreparable loses. Indira just played a venture which was not affordable for Bharat.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom