You turned my example around. The US is a much bigger country with a bigger economy and a population. Of course it'll provide better for its people. The question was the other way around and you couldn't answer it so your turned the equation upside down and put it back on me. Not smart.
The questin was, WHY is itthat the UAE, a MUCH smaller country in every way (Economy, Size and Population) able to provide a MUCH better lifestyle to its people compared to a much bigger economy called India with such a massive size and population? Answer this, don't turn anything around. Read above and answer it, then I'll answer to your post. You can't twist the question you can't answer and try to verbally win the argument. Here's the question so you stay focus:
WHY is it that the UAE, a MUCH smaller country in every way (Economy, Size and Population) able to provide a MUCH better lifestyle to its people compared to a much bigger economy called India with such a massive size and population?
This keeps going round in a circle.
UAE is able to provide much better lifestyle, because its a much richer country on a per capita basis than India or China. Will Pakistan be richer, much richer, than India and China on per capita basis come 2050? We don't know, cause a mere ranking of the economy doesn't tell you anything about the size of the economy or GDP per capita. But if the projections for 2050 from leading banks are to be believed, then there is a fat chance of that happening. China will be way ahead of Pakistan, and India will be slightly ahead of Pakistan. So your argument doesn't hold. Countries like UAE and Qatar are outliers, with economy boosted by petro dollars, Pakistani economy is not.