pakistan won kishan ganga dam case
- Thread starter Imran Khan
- Start date
- Status
Always Neutral
BANNED
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2007
- Messages
- 4,859
- Reaction score
- -20
I suspect this thread will disappear soon.
Bombermanx1
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2013
- Messages
- 1,576
- Reaction score
- -12
- Country
- Location
LoL on the lighter note, this is a hillarious abuse, Pani chor, ll never thought someone would say that.Shut up you water thief!
Chronos
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2013
- Messages
- 5,920
- Reaction score
- 15
- Country
- Location
You don't know how evil Yindoo baniyas are.
The other day, I shoplifted vegetables. Guess greed is in my yindoo genes.
Imran Khan
PDF VETERAN
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2007
- Messages
- 68,815
- Reaction score
- 5
- Country
- Location
IAC gives verdict on Kishanganga Dam Project
Pakistan approached the International Court of Arbitration on violation of Indian government against Indus Water Treaty 1960.
The International Arbitration Court has passed its judgment in favour of Pakistan on Kishanganga Dam Project.
Pakistan approached the International Court of Arbitration on violation of Indian government against Indus Water Treaty 1960.
Earlier‚ Pakistan has objected on the design of the dam.
The court has given the verdict after nine months.
Radio Pakistan-
Pakistan approached the International Court of Arbitration on violation of Indian government against
Pakistan approached the International Court of Arbitration on violation of Indian government against Indus Water Treaty 1960.
The International Arbitration Court has passed its judgment in favour of Pakistan on Kishanganga Dam Project.
Pakistan approached the International Court of Arbitration on violation of Indian government against Indus Water Treaty 1960.
Earlier‚ Pakistan has objected on the design of the dam.
The court has given the verdict after nine months.
Radio Pakistan-
Pakistan approached the International Court of Arbitration on violation of Indian government against
karan.1970
BANNED
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2010
- Messages
- 14,781
- Reaction score
- -20
- Country
- Location
ICA allows India to construct Kishanganga Dam - thenews.com.pk
HAGUE: International Court of Arbitration (ICA) has allowed India to build Kishanganga Dam in the occupied Kashmir, however, the neighnouring country has been ordered to provide half of the dam’s water to Pakistan.
Pakistan has received the verdict of ICA over Kishanganga Hydroelectric project case.
The court also ruled that India can not take the water on a very low level in the dam.
Pakistan had objected to the construction of the Kishanganga project, which is called Neelum River in Pakistan.
India’s 330 MW Kishanganga hydroelectric project would affect Pakistan’s 969 MW Nelum-Jhelum hydroelectric project.
HAGUE: International Court of Arbitration (ICA) has allowed India to build Kishanganga Dam in the occupied Kashmir, however, the neighnouring country has been ordered to provide half of the dam’s water to Pakistan.
Pakistan has received the verdict of ICA over Kishanganga Hydroelectric project case.
The court also ruled that India can not take the water on a very low level in the dam.
Pakistan had objected to the construction of the Kishanganga project, which is called Neelum River in Pakistan.
India’s 330 MW Kishanganga hydroelectric project would affect Pakistan’s 969 MW Nelum-Jhelum hydroelectric project.
Sugarcane
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2011
- Messages
- 21,105
- Reaction score
- 29
- Country
- Location
So, Decision is in India's favor - Title & OP is misleading
karan.1970
BANNED
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2010
- Messages
- 14,781
- Reaction score
- -20
- Country
- Location
Its confusing right now.. Also none of the mainstream media is reporting on this in India.. Should be clearer as the day goes by..
Practical Academic: Kishanganga Award in India's Favour: News Report
Robinhood Pandey
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2013
- Messages
- 5,580
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Sugarcane
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2011
- Messages
- 21,105
- Reaction score
- 29
- Country
- Location
Last Pakistan's govt. screwed up big time by not taking necessary action on time, So - it's most likely in India's favor with something for Pak's govt. to save face. Nothing unexpected as we have Chutiyas sitting both in govt. and bureaucracy.
Imran Khan
PDF VETERAN
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2007
- Messages
- 68,815
- Reaction score
- 5
- Country
- Location
Pakistan won the case against India regarding Kishanganga Dam - بحث GoogleNone of Pakistani news websites is reporting it.
sir jee its clear .
india start dam pakistan oppose design because of water flow . india ignored our concerns . we went count and court order to change design as pakistan willing . so ? i think its win as now our water will not effect and our concerns won now india have to change the design very simple logic
Indischer
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2013
- Messages
- 4,844
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Sugarcane
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2011
- Messages
- 21,105
- Reaction score
- 29
- Country
- Location
Old News
KARACHI: After several months of defeats in the international diplomatic arena, Pakistan scored a rare victory on Saturday: the Netherlands-based Court of Arbitration has accepted Islamabad’s application for a stay-order on the Kishanganga Dam and ruled that, until a final settlement between India and Pakistan is reached, New Delhi will not be allowed to resume construction.
The seven-member court unanimously ruled in favour of Pakistan’s application seeking a stay order on construction of the Kishanganga Hydroelectric Project (KHEP).
Under the order, India will not be allowed to make “any permanent works on or above the Kishanganga/Neelum riverbed at the Gurez site that may inhibit the restoration of the flow of the river to its natural channel.”
Pakistan has contended that the Kishanganga Dam – named after the tributary of the Jhelum River – violates the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty signed by India and Pakistan to allocate the use of the Indus river system.
The ruling is a surprising reversal of an August 25 decision by the panel that had decided against issuing a stay order. On that occasion, infighting within Pakistan’s legal and diplomatic team had caused them to present what the court had then described as an unconvincing argument.
While not an endorsement of Pakistan’s stance on the dam building controversy, the stay order grants one of Islamabad’s most important requests: that India’s construction activities be halted. Crucially, from the Pakistani perspective, no such order has been issued to Pakistan, which is building a dam three times bigger, known as the Neelum-Jhelum Hydroelectric Project (NHJEP).
This order is absolutely critical for one reason: the court is likely to determine which of the two projects – KHEP or NHJEP – should be allowed to proceed based on one criteria above most others: which dam is closer to completion.
The Indian dam was scheduled for completion in 2014, whereas the Pakistani dam is not scheduled to be finished until 2016. The stay order, however, completely changes those timelines, particularly since it affects only the Indian dam and not the Pakistani one.
This methodology is known as the ‘priority rights method’ and is derived from the Indus Water Treaty itself. It is considered unusual in international law and had been deemed by many Pakistani experts as almost fatally weakening Pakistan’s case, since India has completed about 40% of the construction on the Kinshanganga Dam.
It is unclear, however, whether the stay order improves Pakistan’s chances of winning the overall case against the Indian dam.
On May 17, 2010, Pakistan had initiated proceedings against India at the Court of Arbitration under Article IX and Annexure G of the Indus Waters Treaty.
India had expected Pakistan to seek a stay order in January 2011 and was surprised when Pakistani officials failed to do so. Indian newspapers described Pakistan’s delay as an ‘unexpected reprieve’ for New Delhi.
The new stay order comes with an enforcement mechanism: Pakistan and India will arrange for joint inspections of the dam site in India to ensure that the Court’s orders are followed.
India had planned to generate about 300 megawatts of electricity from the dam, a project that is now likely to be put into jeopardy.
The seven-member Court of Arbitration is based in The Hague, in the Netherlands. It is chaired by Judge Stephen M. Schwebel (United States), former President of the International Court of Justice. The other members of the Court are Sir Franklin Berman (United Kingdom), Professor Howard S. Wheater (United Kingdom), Professor Lucius Caflisch (Switzerland), Professor Jan Paulsson (Sweden), Judge Bruno Simma (Germany), and Judge Peter Tomka (Slovakia).
Rare victory: Pakistan wins stay order against Indian dam – The Express Tribune
KARACHI: After several months of defeats in the international diplomatic arena, Pakistan scored a rare victory on Saturday: the Netherlands-based Court of Arbitration has accepted Islamabad’s application for a stay-order on the Kishanganga Dam and ruled that, until a final settlement between India and Pakistan is reached, New Delhi will not be allowed to resume construction.
The seven-member court unanimously ruled in favour of Pakistan’s application seeking a stay order on construction of the Kishanganga Hydroelectric Project (KHEP).
Under the order, India will not be allowed to make “any permanent works on or above the Kishanganga/Neelum riverbed at the Gurez site that may inhibit the restoration of the flow of the river to its natural channel.”
Pakistan has contended that the Kishanganga Dam – named after the tributary of the Jhelum River – violates the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty signed by India and Pakistan to allocate the use of the Indus river system.
The ruling is a surprising reversal of an August 25 decision by the panel that had decided against issuing a stay order. On that occasion, infighting within Pakistan’s legal and diplomatic team had caused them to present what the court had then described as an unconvincing argument.
While not an endorsement of Pakistan’s stance on the dam building controversy, the stay order grants one of Islamabad’s most important requests: that India’s construction activities be halted. Crucially, from the Pakistani perspective, no such order has been issued to Pakistan, which is building a dam three times bigger, known as the Neelum-Jhelum Hydroelectric Project (NHJEP).
This order is absolutely critical for one reason: the court is likely to determine which of the two projects – KHEP or NHJEP – should be allowed to proceed based on one criteria above most others: which dam is closer to completion.
The Indian dam was scheduled for completion in 2014, whereas the Pakistani dam is not scheduled to be finished until 2016. The stay order, however, completely changes those timelines, particularly since it affects only the Indian dam and not the Pakistani one.
This methodology is known as the ‘priority rights method’ and is derived from the Indus Water Treaty itself. It is considered unusual in international law and had been deemed by many Pakistani experts as almost fatally weakening Pakistan’s case, since India has completed about 40% of the construction on the Kinshanganga Dam.
It is unclear, however, whether the stay order improves Pakistan’s chances of winning the overall case against the Indian dam.
On May 17, 2010, Pakistan had initiated proceedings against India at the Court of Arbitration under Article IX and Annexure G of the Indus Waters Treaty.
India had expected Pakistan to seek a stay order in January 2011 and was surprised when Pakistani officials failed to do so. Indian newspapers described Pakistan’s delay as an ‘unexpected reprieve’ for New Delhi.
The new stay order comes with an enforcement mechanism: Pakistan and India will arrange for joint inspections of the dam site in India to ensure that the Court’s orders are followed.
India had planned to generate about 300 megawatts of electricity from the dam, a project that is now likely to be put into jeopardy.
The seven-member Court of Arbitration is based in The Hague, in the Netherlands. It is chaired by Judge Stephen M. Schwebel (United States), former President of the International Court of Justice. The other members of the Court are Sir Franklin Berman (United Kingdom), Professor Howard S. Wheater (United Kingdom), Professor Lucius Caflisch (Switzerland), Professor Jan Paulsson (Sweden), Judge Bruno Simma (Germany), and Judge Peter Tomka (Slovakia).
Rare victory: Pakistan wins stay order against Indian dam – The Express Tribune
Last edited:
- Status
Similar threads
