What's new

Featured Pakistan Ulema Council announces support for construction of temple

HAIDER

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
33,771
Reaction score
14
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
  • 5f095cef9024d.jpg

    Constitution categorically defines rights of Muslims and non-Muslims living in country, says PUC chief. — Dawn/File


    ISLAMABAD: The Pakistan Ulema Council (PUC) has extended support to the construction of a temple in Islamabad and criticised those who were making the issue controversial.

    “We denounce the controversy over construction of the temple. This [making it controversial] by extremist clerics is not correct. PUC will call a meeting and will also present its point of view to the Council of Islamic Ideology (CII),” said Hafiz Mohammad Tahir Mehmood Ashrafi, the chairman of PUC.

    Talking to media on Friday, Hafiz Ashrafi said the Constitution of Pakistan categorically defines the rights of Muslims and non-Muslims living in the country.

    “To have their own place of worship and offer a life as per their faith and tradition are the right given to all non-Muslims in the Constitution and as well as in Sharia,” he said, adding: “Those opposing the construction of the temple have an incorrect interpretation of Sharia.”

    Hafiz Ashrafi, who is also the chairman of Muthahida Ulema Board, Punjab, added that the Hindus living in Pakistan were not residents of any conquered land; therefore, the the interpretation presented by certain clerics about the rights of non-Muslims in Sharia is not applicable to Hindus and members of other religious minorities living in the country.

    Constitution categorically defines rights of Muslims and non-Muslims living in country, says PUC chief

    “Pakistan Ulema Council has been playing a frontline role for interfaith harmony in the country and we will continue to do so.”

    The PUC has been vocal against violence and extremist behaviours against the non-Muslim citizens of the country.

    “Even in the Ulema Board there have been several unfounded complaints related to violations of the blasphemy law against the people of religious minorities but we not only turned them down but also warned the complainants in a few cases against lodging false complaints.”

    Hafiz Ashrafi said strict action should be taken against elements who coined blasphemy allegations against their opponents in pursuit of their vested interests.

    He said Muthahida Ulema Board had resolved 105 such cases in the last one year.

    He said Pakistan came into being in accordance with an international agreement and non-Muslim population of Pakistan have been playing a very positive and effective role for stability of the country.

    He said there was no harm or threat to the faith or any other risk involved in establishing a place of worship for the non-Muslim minorities.

    “Dozens of worship places have been established in the country for religious minorities and recently the government constructed the Kartarpur Corridor for Sikh pilgrims,” he said. “Did anybody observed any threat to Islam - No.”

    He added: “PUC in coordination with the World Peace Council will soon host a convention in Islamabad which will be attended by representatives of different religious schools of thought and religions.”

    Responding to a question, he said: “We are very clear; no extremist group or individual should be allowed to usurp the rights of minorities in the country.”

    Published in Dawn, July 11th, 2020


 
. .
1. Why do we have a Ulema Council in the first place? Islam is simple, no need for Mullahs making things more complicated!
2. The Hindus shall have their Mandir even in Islamabad, but on their own cost!
3. A Muslim country funding Mandirs? Pakistan ka Matlab kya? Don't you see the implication?
4. The world knows that this is a PR stunt. No white man in the West will appreciate this move, and even if some people do: What will we get from this? More money, more nukes?
5. Improve the economic situation in the country, cut senseless spending for almost everything and cut the damn taxes and regulations for the people. Extend the rule of law, abolish these corrupt wannabe-Oxford Court-System. After that every religious minority will have enough money and prosperity to spend on their religious buildings.
 
.
Software Update v 2.0

Mandir to Wahin Banega !
 
. . .
If ulema clears this issue then its good.
 
.
If ulema clears this issue then its good.
Mullahs have a history of making rulings that please the government. So nothing to see here.

Good to see some upgrade in Mullahs/Molvis.. But we need to update them up to Latest version.8-)
Pakistani mullahs truly need an update. But an Islamic one and not a woke/sarkari one.
 
.
What's up with Pakistani cucks who'd sell their daughters for "gora approval" using Hindutva catch phrase for Temple in Pakistan?
@waz @Signalian would you clean up this mess or i will have to tell him in my own words.

Apne Paiso se banao
Jesy kartarpur govt k paisy se bana, jesy Faisal mosque main govt ka paisa laga, jesy Badshahi mosque ki renovation govt k paisy se hoi to janab ye mandir b govt k paisy se he banega.
 
.
Tahir Asharfi has close relations with indian ngos so he will definitely support mandir but will never speak for kashmiris who are suffering and facing indian brutality,such scholars not represent Muslims
 
. .
Mullahs have a history of making rulings that please the government. So nothing to see here.


Pakistani mullahs truly need an update. But an Islamic one and not a woke/sarkari one.
Bold one Not needed, Even our every government understand this. Asharafi as SARKARI one is good, otherwise people will do violence and demolish idols that is not good for peace.
 
.
kartarpur was more of political importance due to khalistan movement but mandir not help much but will please indian regime more unlike kartarpur which was causing pain in india,govt can renovate existing mandirs like they did for badshahi Mosque instead of building new one but when our economy becomes good and we are able to feed poor people who are suffering from poverty and starvation in sindh and their misery cannot be ended by building mandir
@waz @Signalian would you clean up this mess or i will have to tell him in my own words.


Jesy kartarpur govt k paisy se bana, jesy Faisal mosque main govt ka paisa laga, jesy Badshahi mosque ki renovation govt k paisy se hoi to janab ye mandir b govt k paisy se he banega.
 
.
kartarpur was more of political importance due to khalistan movement but mandir not help much but will please indian regime more unlike kartarpur which was causing pain in india,govt can renovate existing mandirs like they did for badshahi Mosque instead of building new one but when our economy becomes good and we are able to feed poor people who are suffering from poverty and starvation in sindh and their misery cannot be ended by building mandir
My pak brother,
I do agree with you that govt money should be spent on people welfare and religion should be left to them. However any mandir inside Pakistan is not to please anyone outside the Pakistan but to please our Hindus brothers in Pakistan who conitnue to serve this country with their blood and sweat. It is about giving them their right which is protected by constitution of Pakistan.
 
.
Jesy kartarpur govt k paisy se bana,
Sikhs pay 20 USD fee to visit Kartarpur. So it’s kind of an investment. Sikhs will not Rebell against India because they are one of the most anti-Muslim on the planet, but it still brings some revenue.


jesy Faisal mosque main govt ka paisa laga,
Faisal mosque was a gift from Muslim Saudi Arabia to Muslim Pakistan. Pakistans government shouldn’t fund mosques either because there are enough and if people need one they can built one on their own.


jesy Badshahi mosque ki renovation govt k paisy se hoi
Badshahi mosque is a historic mosque and Muslim Pakistan should preserve its Muslim history.


to janab ye mandir b govt k paisy se he banega.
Bad investment and against our religion. The state shall protect the Hindu minority against hatred and violence, but this doesn’t include handouts for them.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom