RealNapster
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- May 6, 2015
- Messages
- 7,611
- Reaction score
- 9
- Country
- Location
Could be Shaheen-1A under each wing and Ababeel MIRV under the fuselage.
Next time please take a picture.
We need to put dual rack on them for HQ-9.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Could be Shaheen-1A under each wing and Ababeel MIRV under the fuselage.
Next time please take a picture.
Refuelling in a solid-fuel missile?
It is not about solving problems brother. It is about having a strategic deterence against any threat possible. You will not be safe until you could target any country on earth. Real deterrence...ICBM cannot solve our problem with US. We would need a Chinese or Russian level of military modernization and build up to take on US militarily. I understand that American have been spoilers for our national interests but we haven't reached to a point where there are open hostilities.
Pakistan does actually need a ICBM to secure itself. Please explain why it does not need it,Crazy talk. Pakistan does not need ICBM's to secure itself.
Pakistan is the only nuclear power to have never conducted a ICBM test. This is the aukat of our leaders.Minimum deterrence is always required to defend yourself against larger and more powerful enemy. In that context, ICBM Test would be helpful.