Leo~Calicratis
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2014
- Messages
- 106
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Nop, because the encapsulated missile itself doesn 't fire while under water. It only fires after its capsule breaches the surface. The capsule is ejected by the submarine and goes up to the surface without tapping into the power of the missile..
by saying "technically, yes" I, too, mean this
The statements that I read and noted a bit of information, I will ink down my observations as following. (Not my field at all). First of all, by the grace of ALLAH, we have the capability of Second Strike by Babur-III.
@Oscar @Khafee @Rashid Mahmood @The Deterrent
- If it was the first test then obviously we wouldn't risk one of our Sub because, there are always possibilities of technical glitches or error so Sub cannot be risked, therefore, in layman's terms, a replica like Sub (a platform representing Sub) with same style of launch, tube push, ejection is used and every bit of details and readings are noted for finalization etc purpose. As a platform, not an original Sub, is used then still the weapon be called as SLCM due to its purpose and method as well as real goal. By doing so, finally taking everything into account, the weapon become mature and can be launched from original/targeted Sub and be called operational as successful in final test hence induction.
- The weapon is being tested extensively for time to time to it's real/aimed and targeted results and once every thing is finalized/trusted after all checkups, is being tested again from original launch platform on the basis of all previous tests from replica/test platform.
- It is true that a new weapon will not be tested from original platform directly but has to reach to such stage after trials through test platform.
- As @Rashid Mahmood said, test was done almost 2 years ago, actually tells that this weapon matured through test platform during 2 years hence finally launched from original Sub hence is equal to having the capability in final stage.
- If we go by the term launched from underwater platform so it may be the same launching platform called as replica in this post, to finalize the launch, weapon, tube exit etc and then, as results are satisfactory, will again be tested from original Sub (Augosta 90B etc).
- The confusion w.r.t. launch platform will be more clear in coming days but professional and informed posters words are to be taken as credible for the moment as well by looking at accuracy of hitting the target, seems like a lot of work is already done and many readings were available from previous tests.
in the last quarter of 2016 I read and learnt about that Pakistan's Ministry of Defense Productions been suggested by the related Senate Committee of Pakistan to assign govt. organizations to develop a "naval launch system". about what, the launch system is, wasn't mentioned in the news. though, as I am surfing in the military defense & strategic issues related arena in the web, I learnt that naval launch systems extensively relates the launching systems of the missiles & such projectiles. then I assumed that Pakistan has the missile tech for second strike but in need of an indigenous and extensive tailor made launch system which would b unilaterally integrated with Pakistan's secind strike capability. and now we saw thar Pakistan Armed Forces developing this exclusively prestigious deterrence shortly as its now needed much. in such a perspective, I believe too, Pakistan's strategic military techs developing agencies has the required technologies and capabilities to develop and manufacture nuclear propulsion submarines domestically.