What's new

Pakistan raises issue of drone strikes at UN Human Rights Council

Devil Soul

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
22,931
Reaction score
45
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Pakistan raises issue of drone strikes at UN Human Rights Council
June 15, 2016, 5:41 pm
SHARE :



ISLAMABAD: Permanent Representative of Pakistan at UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, Ambassador Tehmina Janjua stressed that the Human Rights Council and its mechanisms should respond to human rights violations and the loss of precious lives as a result of drone strikes on the territory of Pakistan in violation of its sovereignty.

She was speaking to the council, She emphasized that these drone strikes are also a violation of UN Charter, International Law including Human Rights and Humanitarian Law.

Pakistan has been stressing repeatedly that use of armed drones or remotely piloted aircrafts is a breach of human rights, in particulars, the right to life, which is non-derogable. The ambassador urged the international community and the Human Rights Council to remain seized of human rights violations taking place as a result of illegal drone strikes.
http://nation.com.pk/islamabad/15-J...e-of-drone-strikes-at-un-human-rights-council
 
Use of drone strikes violates who's human rights? The terrorists and their families? What about the millions of Pakistanis denied basic human rights by the state? Laughable. Only our esteemed policy makers can be so retarded to make such a move. But nothing surprises anymore in regards to their actions. Carry on retards. :coffee:
 
I would like to hear PLAN-B by GOP if UN HRC wont budge (and they wont).
 
the right to life, which is non-derogable

List of Non-Derogable Rights and Freedoms under Article 4 of the ICCPR

List of Non-Derogable Rights and Freedoms
under Article 4 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
PART III
Article 6

1. Every human being has the inherent right to life. This right shall be protected by law. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life.
2. In countries which have not abolished the death penalty, sentence of death may be imposed only for the most serious crimes in accordance with the law in force at the time of the commission of the crime and not contrary to the provisions of the present Covenant and to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. This penalty can only be carried out pursuant to a final judgement rendered by a competent court.

Seeing both Pakistan and the US uphold the death penalty her argument is invalid, apart from trying to suport the human rights of a mass murdering thug being as stupid as getting into a spitting contest with a camel
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom