What's new

Pakistan Military Multimedia

many things in this documentary are not true.
the highest manned border posts are in india "Saltoro Ridge" its altitudes range from 5,450 to 7,720 m (17,880 to 25,330 feet). the highest helipad in the world is "Point Sonam"(in india), 21,000 feet (6,400 m) above the sea level. pakistan army is camped at the valleys of the glacier and indian army is in the peaks of the glacier.
Ji, or wahan (peaks) say jo crude oil, tail ka konwah or doodh ki nahar nikal rha hai na, enjoy that.
 
.
11872259_837391046358067_3580831883620568988_o.jpg
 
.
learn the facts brainwahsed boy. what i have said is true. the entire siachen glacier is controlled by indian army. pakistan army is only deployed at the valley.
This is Multimedia thread not Dicussion, i suggest stick with the topic, share the pics or leave, do not derail the thread.
 
. .
learn the facts brainwahsed boy. what i have said is true. the entire siachen glacier is controlled by indian army. pakistan army is only deployed at the valley.
Piss off fanboy... I've witnessed your stupidity several time first hand... So don't paleed this thread get lost to your whinning in your section... And "wow" at shitty scopes.
 
. . . .
So even if it did, what strategic benefit did it get you except for a whole bunch body bags. Purpose of your incursion was to cut off KKH and you are not even close to that. Height is a liability in that region. Fools

there are lot of advantages to as due to the dominated heights.. ask your soldiers, why they were unable to capture the siachen glacier, they will explain the importance.

Piss off fanboy... I've witnessed your stupidity several time first hand... So don't paleed this thread get lost to your whinning in your section... And "wow" at shitty scopes.
look brainwashed man. its not may fault that you can't accept the truth. i don't have any intention to troll like you does in the threads related to indian defense.

This is Multimedia thread not Dicussion, i suggest stick with the topic, share the pics or leave, do not derail the thread.

i was just replaying to him.
 
.

What is this rifle? I think it was Tabore....


I really can't understand that why PAF is not using Mirage III-V for bombing in KPK-FATA and using JF-17s and F-16s.
 
. . .
there are lot of advantages to as due to the dominated heights.. ask your soldiers, why they were unable to capture the siachen glacier, they will explain the importance.
.

Even if you could take heavy artillery to those heights normal ballistics don't work so these post are nothing but observation posts which are difficult to man and have a very high casualty rates because of the altitude. PA never tried to capture or recapture Siachin. The idea was to restrict IA access to the KKH which they effectively did. Thanks to your stupidity and arrogance you are now stuck with getting your @$$es frozen at 22,000 feet. Nothing to be proud of. Sheer stupidity.
 
.
Even if you could take heavy artillery to those heights normal ballistics don't work so these post are nothing but observation posts which are difficult to man and have a very high casualty rates because of the altitude. PA never tried to capture or recapture Siachin. The idea was to restrict IA access to the KKH which they effectively did. Thanks to your stupidity and arrogance you are now stuck with getting your @$$es frozen at 22,000 feet. Nothing to be proud of. Sheer stupidity.
Indians are mota dimagh. Especially @hkdas who is mixing benefits of a mountainous/semi-mountainous terrain with that of a glaciated terrain.

For ease, readers should consider this; In the former case, if let's say, we occupy Tiger Hill, we are able to dominate a strategic highway, but in case of latter, if Indians occupy a higher post, they dominate, well, a comparatively better view, at the cost of higher casualty rate due to harsher weather, higher cost of living/sustenance and more difficulty in holding the post.

Siachen is not Kashmir, where by holding 'more' land the Indians can dominate/control our rivers or for that matter divert water/build illegal dams etc. Nor it is Punjab where by holding a higher ground one can influence the outcome of a battle. Instead, as the fight at Siachen is mostly static, there is virtually no benefit for being on the top, especially when we are holding posts just adjacent to the Indians (at times only a few meters away) to nullify any advantage whatsoever, except that the Indian can thump their chest and fool their jingoistic lot who lack the comprehension to differentiate between mountainous and glaciated zones, by (constantly) telling them, "hey look, we are sitting at a 'higher altitude' at Siachen!" At best, they can make another Bollywood movie and 'belittle' us Pakistanis for the consumption of their own audience.

By holding most of the Glacier, the 'advantage' Indians get are: almost total dependence on air-lifts to maintain their troops, more casualty rate, and thrice the amount of expenditure. Now, by holding "more snow" if the Indians could interdict, lets say our access to China, then may be i could have congratulated them, but till that happens, like i said earlier, the Indians should make the most from the access this 'higher altitude' is giving them to the gold-mines and uranium deposits at Siachen Glacier. :)
 
Last edited:
.
Siachen is not Kashmir, where by holding 'more' land the Indians can dominate/control our rivers or for that matter divert water/build illegal dams etc.

Doesn't the Siachen glacier feed the Nubra and Shyok rivers, sizable tributaries of the Indus river?
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom