SleepingLion
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2016
- Messages
- 152
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
I don't have Rs/200 in my pocket and how can we say anything about Pakistan's nuclear stockpile.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not credible
Yeah they make sure Indian nukes don't wipe out that 70 million.
India has no first use and all of subcontinent nation except pakistan do not fear Indian nuclear weapon. However in case any of that is used against India, God save those 70 million and rest 130 million.
New Recruit
If we didn't have nukes India would have fired upon us with it's nukes long ago, first use doesn't make a difference to those dogs in power.
it was the Chinese nuclear cover that kept you at bay from 1974 to 1984. And understand something, your "massive" nuclear retaliation will result in a simultaneous nuclear retaliation from us, literally at the same time. So india only has one of two options if it chooses to make the foolish mistake of practicing its cole slaw doctrine err I mean cold start doctrine only to be blown away by a tactical nuke, there is no third:That is what you guys are fed. We tested our first Nuke in early 70s and you guys did it in 1998. In these 25 years how many times we nuked you or threatened to nuke. However, Now you have a doctrine of using tactical nukes and we have a doctrine of massive retaliation to inflict unacceptable damage to enemy. Let us see what happens. Nuclear madness of your idiot politicians and and war mongers of pakistan will land your country in big trouble one day. God bless both countries.
it was the Chinese nuclear cover that kept you at bay from 1974 to 1984. And understand something, your "massive" nuclear retaliation will result in a simultaneous nuclear retaliation from us, literally at the same time. So india only has one of two options if it chooses to make the foolish mistake of practicing its cole slaw doctrine err I mean cold start doctrine only to be blown away by a tactical nuke, there is no third:
1. mutually assured destruction.
2. shut up and accept the heavy losses of the failed attack due to the tactical nuke.
Or you can keep living in a fools paradise that Pakistan barely has "25" tiny itty bitty warheads that can't harm anyone. You know the end result.
as usual you habitually under estimate us while over estimating yourself. so I'll lay it down on the line for you so that you won't have any excuse to say that no one warned you.You are suffering from same Nuke mania of Khwaja Asif. If we do first strike, you will not be able to use any of you nuke. So calm down and do not talk like an idiot. Nukes not there to use.
as usual you habitually under estimate us while over estimating yourself. so I'll lay it down on the line for you so that you won't have any excuse to say that no one warned you.
if you use first anything including nukes, understand and realize that you will cease to exist even before your first warhead detonates over Pakistan. Under estimate the the strength and the speed of our nuclear forces only at your own peril. You have no idea how fast we can overwhelm you. So take a deep breath and stop talking to yourself like bumbling moron who is a legend but only in his own mind.
You've been fairly warned.
As I said, you've been fairly warned. But feel free not to believe me and test us at your own peril. You will have only yourselves to blame.We never underestimate you. It is you guys who underestimate us . You did that 4 times in 70 years. Still you re unwilling to learn any lesson. When did you get that overwhelming capability. We have not seen in any of four wars with you? Is this capability newly acquired?
In a way yes, since it deters and prevents India from making 70 million Shish Kebab Pakistanis.. and poorer if it could..Can these atomic bombs make any difference in the lives of 70million poor of Pakistan ?