What's new

Pakistan envoy seeks increased US pressure on India

INDIAPOSITIVE

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 20, 2014
Messages
9,318
Reaction score
-28
Country
India
Location
India
Washington: Pakistan’s ambassador to the United States, Jalil Abbas Jilani, has said he is optimistic about prospects for peace in Afghanistan after the US pullout, but asserted that the Obama administration should be doing more to foster peace in South Asia and pressure India to embrace economic and counterterrorism overtures from Islamabad, the Washington Times reported on Monday.

In an exclusive interview with the Washington Times — his first major on-the-record session with a US news organisation since assuming ambassadorship in Washington — Jilani said in the past year, Indian leaders showed a “kind of arrogance not to engage,” and New Delhi has failed to respond to Pakistan’s efforts to create a joint counterterrorism initiative between the neighbouring countries.

While US “cajoling” may open India to take initiative on the matter, Jilani said, the United States’ attention toward India seems to be having the opposite effect by bolstering New Delhi’s confidence to continue ignoring Islamabad.
“If they don’t feel any pressure from any side, obviously they are a big country and they will say, ‘Why should we engage with a smaller country like Pakistan?’” the ambassador said.
Despite his comments on India, the ambassador insisted Islamabad’s relations with Washington are stronger today than they have been at any other point since May 2011, when dialogue was halted as a result of the secret raid that killed Osama Bin Laden in Abbottabad.

Asked whether he was satisfied with the administration’s plan for Afghanistan, Jilani responded with a “yes” but added that the situation’s delicateness was part of “ongoing discussions” between Islamabad and Washington and that factors on the ground may change the calculus of the withdrawal.

“We have been saying that the drawdown should not be abrupt. We have been saying that it should be based on the ground realities,” Jilani said, warning that too rapid a pullout would add pressure to the Pakistani military in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas already engaged in operation to combat terror in the region.
“To give you one example, when we launched these operations in North Waziristan, which we started in June of last year, we were hoping that there should have been a coordinated response from the Afghan side,” the ambassador said.
“Now we are witnessing for the last couple of months that there are coordinated responses.”
“We are hitting these groups on our side and the escape route is Afghanistan,” he said. “Previously they would simply disappear in Afghanistan. Now there is a coordinated response from the Afghan side as well, and there is a coordinated response from the US side as well, which is something which is extremely, I think, beneficial to all the sides.”
Apart from such developments, the ambassador said, leaders in Pakistan are aware that long-term stability in South Asia will depend on easing friction with India. Relations between the two countries have become strained after reports that Russia approved the sale of heavy attack helicopters to Pakistan — a blow to India given that it the country has been a key buyer of Moscow’s arms.

Jilani said “terrorism is as much a concern to Pakistan as it is to India” and that the time is now for the two nations to “engage in a meaningful fashion rather than getting involved in propaganda against each other.”
A breakthrough appeared to be developing in May last year, when Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif accepted an invitation to attend Indian Premier Modi’s inauguration ceremony in New Delhi. Calling Sharif’s initiative a “very bold” step, Jilani asserted that the Indian leaders did not reciprocate and never showed up when he invited them to his own inauguration in Islamabad. He added that while in New Delhi, Prime Minister Sharif made a push for diplomacy but was essentially spurned by Indian leaders.

“They were able to agree on the revival of the dialogue process at the level of foreign secretary and for absolutely no rhyme or reason, the foreign secretary dialogue was cancelled at the last minute,” the ambassador said. The ambassador concluded that Washington has “played a very important role in the past in bringing the two countries together.”
“We have reason to believe that the US will continue to play that role,” he said.


Pakistan envoy seeks increased US pressure on India | GulfNews.com
 
.
Good thought, but isn't going to happen. India dictates and influences to the US its Pakistan policy. The US doesn't have an independent Pakistan policy any more. That's a fact.

Despite his comments on India, the ambassador insisted Islamabad’s relations with Washington are stronger today than they have been at any other point since May 2011, when dialogue was halted as a result of the secret raid that killed Osama Bin Laden in Abbottabad.

This just isn't true. The relation between the US and Pakistan is one of necessity and nothing more. Both despise and mistrust each other.
 
Last edited:
.
With Obama visit, nuclear deal, Pakistan ok for operation in nwfp. Now its US turn for some concession to Pakistan. Their will be pressure on India now for US to show that both are equal for her.
 
.
There are certain new realities that Pakistan will have to come to terms with, sooner or later. I'd argue that the sooner the better for them, but that's beside the point.

Jilani said in the past year, Indian leaders showed a “kind of arrogance not to engage,” and New Delhi has failed to respond to Pakistan’s efforts to create a joint counterterrorism initiative between the neighbouring countries.

What Pakistan may perceive as 'arrogance' is just pure and unadulterated indifference on India's side. Pakistan must realise that it no longer holds prominence in India's strategic thought as India does in theirs. Yes, terror emanating from Pak soil is a clear and omnipresent threat, and we must give due attention to it, but beyond that, Pakistan is not a foreign policy priority.

“If they don’t feel any pressure from any side, obviously they are a big country and they will say, ‘Why should we engage with a smaller country like Pakistan?’” the ambassador said.
.

For the Nth times infinity, No country has been able to pressure India to engage with or not engage with Pakistan, or for that matter any country. Not in the past, and most certainly not in the future. The US, as recently as 2007-08 was told Holbrooke would be persona non grata if he were to attempt mediation on Kashmir.

Fact is, If terrorism from Pak soil were to vanish tomorrow, We wouldn't care less if Pakistan existed, or did not. Our foreign policy directives are clear: Peace would be a nice proposition, but We'll accept absolute indifference & lack of violence as an acceptable substitute.
 
.
^^ You're only right about one thing. The only reality that Pakistan will have to fathom eventually is that the US is not an ally of Pakistan. The US is an ally, strategic partner or whatever you want to name it of India. That only too for the time being in order to contain China.

As for terror, India isn't a holy cow. India has a very long history of interference in Pakistan. From Balochistan to terror consulates operating from Afghan soil. Everyone knows about it. If India seeks peace, it must also play by the rules.
 
Last edited:
.
New Delhi has failed to respond to Pakistan’s efforts to create a joint counterterrorism initiative between the neighbouring countries.

Kashmir? Now wouldn't that sound the death knell for such an initiative ??? Do they really need an Indian diplomat to point this out to them? :undecided:
 
.
With Obama visit, nuclear deal, Pakistan ok for operation in nwfp. Now its US turn for some concession to Pakistan. Their will be pressure on India now for US to show that both are equal for her.

US cant pressure us.Pakistan needs Kashmir in their concept of dialogue .We wont agree that.Whatever it is.

On topic.Present actions of GoI make its clear that Pakistan is not subject in.their policy.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom