What's new

Pakistan assures US after being warned to ensure security during Obama's India trip

To address your first delusional comment:
US doesn't arm Pakistan with higher-tier anti-terror equipment, constitutes me saying "the US supports and abets terrorism in Pakistan"? is that the nub of your delusional premise? If we are to look at things through the 'lens of objectivity' it would be sage for the US to build a rapport with india, again nobody is disputing whether india is a 'cash cow' or not or whether the US should look to tap into this seemingly fruitful market, i was merely trying to imply given that we are trying to further tap into the asian market, particularly india, we are inadvertently trying to maintain a favourable view in india's 'eyes' therefore, not willing to provide any high-tier military equipment to Pakistan (which by the way would prove to be indispensable in the 'war on terror') as this would somehow 'upset the balance' and irk india. Thereby, leaving Pakistan devoid of any real anti-terror equipment, to fend off the many terror-assailants. Either arm Pakistan adequately in the hope to eradicate terrorism from Pakistan in its entirety or continue at the current pace. This cannot be accentuated enough.

So in essence what you're stating is, the 'global policeman' that is the US, is willing to overlook indian sponsored terrorism in Pakistan for monetary gains? I would double check whether this aligns with our country's official stance, these bold, chest-thumping statements you make aren't helping our image globally.
Moreover, given that your an indian, the same folks that see 'Hafiz Saeed' in 103 places at once, across every border check point, im not a tad bit surprised that most of your posts are inherently delusion filled and steadfast in favour of india, therefore you cannot be trusted to be impartial (Mr Singh i'm guessing thats your real name) even though throughout its history Pakistan has remained and is an american ally whom is on the front lines combating this global scourge that is terrorism. You're beginning to sound no different to extremists. "We should support india, as its an economic powerhouse" with the added connotations of overlooking indian sponsored terrorism. Kudos to you sir, our soldiers die to protect our society and values. Our leaders hold all these meetings/conferences to combat terrorism, you are doing a great injustice to our people when you make such ludicrous statements.
So this begs the question.. Do you accept there is an unprecedented link between india (namely RAW) and terrorism in Pakistan? Or do you deny this fact?? (Failing to answer will mean you are aware of indian sponsored terrorism and wish not to comment upon it).

Ps. Largest democracy who's leader was formerly banned from entering our country before his questionable acquittal with regards to the Gujarat massacre. Can you imagine making a man who's had an apparent strong hand in facilitating this heinous crime/violence being the President/Prime Minister of any western country ?? In sight of this admission, 'largest democracy'?, 'peaceful folk'??. (ahem ahem Kashmir). Who's leader has an extremely dangerous link to a massacre. Couple this to india's new 'peace driven' initiative namely, 'Ghar wapsi' or 'coming home' scheme that has been recently launched against Muslims and Christians within the country.. india a peaceful country? All of which is a figment of your vast imagination..You're clearly not endowed with intellect, but gifted with an abundance of stupidity i see.

Well, at this time you stuck to one theme, albeit it read like a rendition of the sixth sense - " I see Indian people"

Pretty much accused us for the continued existence of terror groups in Pakistan when you say " why does the US not arm Pakistani's with higher grade weapons and systems to combat terrorism?? One possible reason could be the paradigm-shift under which the US looks to woo india with its technological advanced weapons for billions. Thus far, the US has offered nothing of real value in terms of defence equipment to Pakistan, in combating terrorism." .

You created the fiasco and you are complaining about why the U.S. won't give you weapons? We give you a lot in military Aid and you have plenty of weapons of your own. It's really not the weapons you need, rather you need do what you are doing in the NWF and continue to expand that to all terrorist organizations, and we mean ALL if you are serious about cleansing Pakistan of these snakes. And I would love to see that happen, back in saddle towards economic gains and much success.
.
You are absolutely right when you say we are heavily in favour of India- and if India reciprocates, it will only get stronger not just via military ties, but in investment, trade and economic partnership. If one looks at it objectively, it's a huge market, largest democracy and economic powerhouse to be- has a great young skilled labor force and they are a peaceful lot, with no grand vision of being expansionist. They being seen as a great opportunity is not unique to the U.S. Why would we not look at it favourably, when 99.99% of nations feels the same too.

Meanwhile you can have your meltdown and the only takers will be from like minded minority. Your messaging has no market share If you look around the global community. Got to be frustrating for you and you are barely cracking 40 posts here. Can't wait to read those meltdowns for another 40, :lol:
 
Last edited:
To address your first delusional comment:
US doesn't arm Pakistan with higher-tier anti-terror equipment, constitutes me saying "the US supports and abets terrorism in Pakistan"? is that the nub of your delusional premise? If we are to look at things through the 'lens of objectivity' it would be sage for the US to build a rapport with india, again nobody is disputing whether india is a 'cash cow' or not or whether the US should look to tap into this seemingly fruitful market, i was merely trying to imply given that we are trying to further tap into the asian market, particularly india, we are inadvertently trying to maintain a favourable view in india's 'eyes' therefore, not willing to provide any high-tier military equipment to Pakistan (which by the way would prove to be indispensable in the 'war on terror') as this would somehow 'upset the balance' and irk india. Thereby, leaving Pakistan devoid of any real anti-terror equipment, to fend off the many terror-assailants. Either arm Pakistan adequately in the hope to eradicate terrorism from Pakistan in its entirety or continue at the current pace. This cannot be accentuated enough.

So in essence what you're stating is, the 'global policeman' that is the US, is willing to overlook indian sponsored terrorism in Pakistan for monetary gains? I would double check whether this aligns with our country's official stance, these bold, chest-thumping statements you make aren't helping our image globally.
Moreover, given that your an indian, the same folks that see 'Hafiz Saeed' in 103 places at once, across every border check point, im not a tad bit surprised that most of your posts are inherently delusion filled and steadfast in favour of india, therefore you cannot be trusted to be impartial (Mr Singh i'm guessing thats your real name) even though throughout its history Pakistan has remained and is an american ally whom is on the front lines combating this global scourge that is terrorism. You're beginning to sound no different to extremists. "We should support india, as its an economic powerhouse" with the added connotations of overlooking indian sponsored terrorism. Kudos to you sir, our soldiers die to protect our society and values. Our leaders hold all these meetings/conferences to combat terrorism, you are doing a great injustice to our people when you make such ludicrous statements.
So this begs the question.. Do you accept there is an unprecedented link between india (namely RAW) and terrorism in Pakistan? Or do you deny this fact?? (Failing to answer will mean you are aware of indian sponsored terrorism and wish not to comment upon it).

Ps. Largest democracy who's leader was formerly banned from entering our country before his questionable acquittal with regards to the Gujarat massacre. Can you imagine making a man who's had an apparent strong hand in facilitating this heinous crime/violence being the President/Prime Minister of any western country ?? In sight of this admission, 'largest democracy'?, 'peaceful folk'??. (ahem ahem Kashmir). Who's leader has an extremely dangerous link to a massacre. Couple this to india's new 'peace driven' initiative namely, 'Ghar wapsi' or 'coming home' scheme that has been recently launched against Muslims and Christians within the country.. india a peaceful country? All of which is a figment of your vast imagination..You're clearly not endowed with intellect, but gifted with an abundance of stupidity i see.


Rant no 39 and still playing the same old tired tune that gets no play. I commend your passion and suggest you go back to your country and work at getting your meme recognized outside of its borders. You are 1 of 195 (countries) of the views, conspiracies held about India and have much work to do.

Meanwhile we as country are absolutely,unequivocally, happily, unapologetically, with the greatest of desires engaging India and moving towards deeper and deeper ties, if they will have it. Look forward to your rant no 40, with zero buyers in the global community. Your childsplay geopolitical advice form is stamped out as " Denied" ;)
 
and the Indian obsession with Pakistan lives on. long live obsession
 
Well if you have a terrorist breeding hostile state like Pakistan,you have no other choice

we never raised the issue of bad smell coming form our east, its a big environment issue in Pakistan. Sometime you just have to say you cannot change the other side.
 
It's now abundantly clear that you're utterly devoid of any intellect and lack key abilities in rationalising your 'hate filled' posts, driven by a 'pungent' personal bias/rotten agenda, which is chronically obscuring your attempt at seeing things objectively and holistically. Your small ignorant brain fails to fathom and address any of my points, except you revert to trolling time and again. This 'syndrome' could potentially be derivative and resultant of a low IQ/Intellect. Pretty evident you aren't interested in anything other than low quality-humourless-trolling, regrettably i'm going to bow out. (Might want to go back to your motherland, indian men aren't viewed favourably in the west, with the added connotation of being potential rapists. In addition, it is no state secret worlds smallest condoms are found in india. Catch my drift 'Mr Singh'. Your phallus doesn't even reach your 'zipper' buddy. We do not envy you).

Ps. You just inadvertently stated that the US overlooks indian sponsored terrorism in Pakistan, for strategic/monetary gains. This does not align with the US policy or public sentiments in anyway, shame on you for propagating such tripe you narrow minded imbecile. Keep your terrorist sympathies to yourself (Mods take a closer look at this potential extremist). Don't reply me, not interested in wasting any more of my precious time on a low-quality, dim-witted, terrorist-sympathising, wannabe, indian troll. I would urge you to read your previous posts, you are in constant denial in every thread and get schooled by most who debate you, this one was no exception. Jog along (potential extremist) 'Mr Singh'.
"Your inept geopolitical advice form is stamped out as "Denied".
Fun fact: Won't even read your reply. I'll leave you to plunge into abject misery.



Rant no 39 and still playing the same old tired tune that gets no play. I commend your passion and suggest you go back to your country and work at getting your meme recognized outside of its borders. You are 1 of 195 (countries) of the views, conspiracies held about India and have much work to do.

Meanwhile we as country are absolutely,unequivocally, happily, unapologetically, with the greatest of desires engaging India and moving towards deeper and deeper ties, if they will have it. Look forward to your rant no 40, with zero buyers in the global community. Your childsplay geopolitical advice form is stamped out as " Denied" ;)
 
Last edited:
It's now abundantly clear that you're utterly devoid of any intellect and lack key abilities in rationalising your 'hate filled' posts, driven by a 'pungent' personal bias/rotten agenda, which is chronically obscuring your attempt at seeing things objectively and holistically. Your small ignorant brain fails to fathom and address any of my points, except you revert to trolling time and again. This 'syndrome' could potentially be derivative and resultant of a low IQ/Intellect. Pretty evident you aren't interested in anything other than low quality-humourless-trolling, regrettably i'm going to bow out. (Might want to go back to your motherland, indian men aren't viewed favourably in the west, with the added connotation of being potential rapists. In addition, it is no state secret worlds smallest condoms are found in india. Catch my drift 'Mr Singh'. Your phallus doesn't even reach your 'zipper' buddy. We do not envy you).

Ps. You just inadvertently stated that the US overlooks indian sponsored terrorism in Pakistan, for strategic/monetary gains. This does not align with the US policy or public sentiments in anyway, shame on you for propagating such tripe you narrow minded imbecile. Keep your terrorist sympathies to yourself (Mods take a closer look at this potential extremist). Don't reply me, not interested in wasting any more of my precious time on a low-quality, dim-witted, terrorist-sympathising, wannabe, indian troll. I would urge you to read your previous posts, you are in constant denial in every thread and get schooled by most who debate you, this one was no exception. Jog along (potential extremist) 'Mr Singh'.
"Your inept geopolitical advice form is stamped out as "Denied".
Fun fact: Won't even read your reply. I'll leave you to plunge into abject misery.

Fun Fact: 1 out of 195
Says all we need to know about the credibility and validity behind your obsession. :lol:
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom