Operation Sunrise 2: Indian, Myanmar armies target insurgent groups, several nabbed

[B.K.N]

So much inferiority complex. Basically, Bangladeshis are celebrating for their "suspected" support to anti India groups.

Being belligerent to India is a symbol of being a mega regional power in "South Asia".

But Bangladesh is pro India then why are they supporting anti India groups

In the article it said it's getting help from abroad. But which country?

Pakistan maybe

 

[namefield_empty]

But Bangladesh is pro India then why are they supporting anti India groups

Because BD-Myanmar relations will run its course independently irrespective of India's relation with either of them. As a third party and a well wisher to both the nations we can only hope for an amicable solution to their outstanding issues so that the region can grow as one.

supporting anti India groups

Premature to say that yet.

 

[Doctor Strange]

How? There is no land contiguity. Secondly, there will be a snowballing effect involving Chin, Kachin states including the Greater Lim areas under de-facto Naga control untill recently. All the good work with Myanmar done in the last few years will be brought to nought.

Well, there is also a sizeable Indian presence there which may worry the Chinese.

Chin state can also join. As these guys are Christans, they dont have special attachments to Burma and pro Indian in nature. Chin is also AA's natural territory. These guys are AA in name, but fights upto Kachin state.

 

[B.K.N]

Premature to say that yet.

So it means Bangladesh is supporting anti Myanmar groups and those groups are common enemy of both India and Barma right

 

[namefield_empty]

Chin state can also join. As these guys are Christans, they dont have special attachments to Burma and pro Indian in nature.

These things cannot be quantified in black or white. While i agree that certain Chin tribes are scattered across India and Myanmar but that doesn't make them pro-India. Do you seriously think that the Eastern Tangkhul Nagas in Sagaing will ever think of them as Indians? Heck, Bengalis are scattered across Assam, Bengal and BD, but will a BD bengali ever take it kindly about the mere thought of being an Indian. These are mere fantasies in my opinion, only way to secure long-lasting peace in NE is to strengthen the control of Myanmar government in every nook and corner of their country.

So it means Bangladesh is supporting anti Myanmar groups and those groups are common enemy of both India and Barma right

Whether BD is supporting the anti Myanmar groups is a matter of debate and discussion, but if you look into the thread replies some of the users seem to have hinted towards it.

But, there are no groups in Myanmar to my knowledge that are overly aggressive towards India, and no Burmese insurgent groups (if we strike off the Naga offshoots) active in India.

 

[sbmc27]

I dont think BD is supporting AA, not even ARSA in heightened situations . ARSA may recieve financial or moral support from some ultra radical elements inside BD but no way it is BD's official position.

Regards.

These things cannot be quantified in black or white. While i agree that certain Chin tribes are scattered across India and Myanmar but that doesn't make them pro-India. Do you seriously think that the Eastern Tangkhul Nagas in Sagaing will ever think of them as Indians? Heck, Bengalis are scattered across Assam, Bengal and BD, but will a BD bengali ever take it kindly about the mere thought of being an Indian. These are mere fantasies in my opinion, only way to secure long-lasting peace in NE is to strengthen the control of Myanmar government in every nook and corner of their country.


Whether BD is supporting the anti Myanmar groups is a matter of debate and discussion, but if you look into the thread replies some of the users seem to have hinted towards it.

But, there are no groups in Myanmar to my knowledge that are overly aggressive towards India, and no Burmese insurgent groups (if we strike off the Naga offshoots) active in India.

 

[bluesky]

So it means Bangladesh is supporting anti Myanmar groups and those groups are common enemy of both India and Barma right

BD is certainly not supporting the AA with weapons or money. But, the AA troops sometimes cross the border and take shelter among the Chin or Kachin refuggees who will soon cross one thousand. Some of the areas in the BD-MM border are essentially no man's land. Our BGB either looks the other way or they do not care unless peace is broken.

@Homo Sapiens

 

[Indx-techs]

What? Are you talking of IA troops in BD? Are you not aware that your tummy troops lost only 1300 of their colleagues in 1971? Was it because your tummies belong to any of the 007 groups or it was that our Muktis took the toll instead of your tummies?

1,300 troops for finishing 20% of other country's military is impressive.

So, how are you going to be over the entire BD with only 1300 dead this time? At least send 1.3 million tummies and expect 1.3 Lakh dead.

In what way? What BD has to cause a death toll of even a thousand to India? East Pakistan in 1971 was far more militarized than BD today.
And BD doesn't even have the geographical advantage what Pakistan enjoys to save itself from India.

India's strategic weapons and tactical mobilization capabilities will make it obliterate and annihilate Bangladesh within few days if not some hours. Only a full scale civil unrest in Bangladesh against India can shoo away occupation. Even that will be useless if India chooses to suppress it disregarding deaths.

But Bangladesh is pro India then why are they supporting anti India groups

I don't know & care if Bangladesh supports terror groups against India. If it does, it will be made to fall in line like Sri Lanka.

It's no way an ally but just another small neighbor of India like Afghanistan, Pakistan, Ceylon, Nepal or Bhutan. BD's existence doesn't bother India, India makes difference to BD. The reason why chose not to be re-occupy it is large Muslim population. We have already more than enough to handle.

BD is just like any other mullah nation like of Pakistan or Iran with lack of strategic depth. It should be treated in same way it behaves with India.

 

[B.K.N]

Afghanistan,

Afghanistan isn't nieghbour of India

 

[Indx-techs]

Afghanistan isn't nieghbour of India

It is. Legally it is. Neither Indian law nor UN resolution of 48 ever recognized so called AJK.

 

[bluesky]

1,300 troops for finishing 20% of other country's military is impressive.

Hey, m*nkey, why are you twisting what I said? It was only 1,300 IA dead. Bloody coward IA troops were just helping our Muktis from behind with big guns and were supporting from the sky. Bloody darfoke Indian. we did the fighting and died. But, you have stolen the credits without shedding blood.

Come to BD with 1.3 million troops if you are that brave and expect 130,000 dead!! Your IA troops die of heart failure at the sound of firing.

 

[B.K.N]

It is. Legally it is. Neither Indian law nor UN resolution of 48 ever recognized so called AJK.

You don't even know what countries border your country

 

[Indx-techs]

Hey, m*nkey, why are you twisting what I said?

I don't need to twist. I'm asking straight, how BD is going to inflict such a big damage to India?

You have started using abuses because chances of BD's survival against Indian aggression are totally nil that even without doing any significant damage to India.

It was only 1,300 IA dead. Bloody coward IA troops were just helping our Muktis from behind with big guns and were supporting from the sky. Bloody darfoke Indian. we did the fighting and died. But, you have stolen the credits without shedding blood.

Thankless moron. Who wiped out their military assets? We have low casualties on our side because of weaponary, not needed your cover.

And if you believe that Mukti Bahini had any role greater or even equal to Indian military in Bangladesh Liberation War, you are stupid.

Pakistan was a result of British concerns about containing a big country like India in confines of a region. And you are a result of solution we found out to partially solve problem created by British.

Come to BD with 1.3 million troops if you are that brave and expect 130,000 dead!! Your IA troops die of heart failure at the sound of firing.

Ask Pakistanis who was scared of firing bullets? We have reintegrated most of Indian states again with India immediately after freedom, involved in major wars on borders and beyond the borders as UN forces. We faced open western aggression after liberating you.

Again, your loudmouth doesn't comply with lenience and dependence of your country on my country.

Explain. How will BD kill 1.3 lakh Indian troops? Put the military assessment here? India has assets what can wipe out large portions of BD's population without feeling any significant heat on other side of border.

We have far far bigger military capabilities proven, a greater culture and strategies and technology. Budget of one command of Indian military, be it Naval, Aerial, Ground, Tri-Service, Space or cyber exceeds entire military budget of BD.

You don't even know what countries border your country

I know very well who do. I'm asking about legal borders. Pakistani controlled Kashmir has no recognition.