OIC Peace Keeping Force for maintaining peace in majority Muslim countries

[HAIDER]

Saudi Air force consist of 712 planes, from transport,trainer to fighters. All of them are top of line, but.....

 

[kalu_miah]

Iraq imports more from Turkey then from Iran, and that is KRG excluded. On the other hand Iraq and the UAE have good economic relations.
So this entire story of Iraq being a client state of Iran is based on what ? its already proven wrong by the economic facts.
I do not know about Syria, Hezbollah however needs Iran to survive, though Irq does not need them for any field, not in the past neither as of today.

2nd we should stay neutral and uninvolved in this, we are in the middle between these countries, nevertheless all they need to focus on is build the defence forces to keep others from interfence and influence in the country.

I hope and wish that you can keep your country together, stay out of Iran's evil influence, improve your relations with fellow Arabs and remain an integral part of Arab League. In order for you to achieve this goal, Iraqi Shia dominated govt. will have to treat the minority Sunni in a way that is different from today. The responsibility to treat a minority properly always rests with the dominant majority.

 

[kalu_miah]

What is this peace keeping force going to do anyway.

In Syria they would have to choose sides or stay out of it completely.
In Iraq what are they going to do ?.. theres nothing for them to do besides standing @ checkpoints which is not needed.
In Afghanistan they can do the work that the UAE troops are doing ( humanitarian ), this could be the only good 1 << + securing the Lebanse borders from Syrian spillover.

It will do peace keeping, stop any sides from fighting. They will not choose sides, they will defend themselves if they are attacked. It will be up to warring sides to accept the peace established by the peace keeping forces. Once fighting is stopped and peace is established, elections will be held to create a new democratic govt. under their authority and security presence. They will remain as long as state security establishments like local army, policy force etc. can take control of the security of the country.

Iraq, Lebanon and Afghanistan have somewhat functioning govt., when any of these countries go into civil war stage with complete break down of the state, only then OICPKF will be deployed.

 

[Doritos11]

It will do peace keeping, stop any sides from fighting. They will not choose sides, they will defend themselves if they are attacked. It will be up to warring sides to accept the peace established by the peace keeping forces. Once fighting is stopped and peace is established, elections will be held to create a new democratic govt. under their authority and security presence. They will remain as long as state security establishments like local army, policy force etc. can take control of the security of the country.

Iraq, Lebanon and Afghanistan have somewhat functioning govt., when any of these countries go into civil war stage with complete break down of the state, only then OICPKF will be deployed.

Like UN peacekeepers, but I have no trust in it that they really would be neutral, no country will trust them to enter, we prefer the UN which already is unfair and corrupt.

 

[Kaniska]

Sorry for stating the unvarnished truth, what it is, is what it is. I do not blame people for not caring. After all Muslims have bothered all major communities of the world, so it is only natural.

This is not the truth rather it is a hype that you are trying to make it out...Indian is worried for terrorism that is coming out from our nearby countries....We never have any issue what Syria is doing or any African Muslim nations are doing....We will feel happy if terrorism is reduced in my country...but that does not mean we will be celebrating for some peoples death in far away areas that does not any impact us.....If Assad stays or goes out...It does not impact us any way....We are only connected with Syria just because Iran has a stake in this role...Otherwise ...how does it matter to us....to feel happy with killing of civillians....You can say that we are not reacting to certain incidents....but that does not mean we will feel happy by killing of civillians.....Your statement is not truth....it is your way of projecting something that does not exist....

 

[kalu_miah]

The question still demands answers? Whom will OIC force fight in Syria/? Whom will it fight in Somalia? In somalia rebels demand strict islamic law, that they are fighting a ligitimate govt. On whom side it will fight?
In Lebanon hizbollah or govt?
in Afghanistan on the side of taliban or govt?

I think the immediate focus will be Syria and then after an initial success, they will look at other possible deployments to stop any ongoing conflict where large numbers are getting killed.

OICPKF will fight anyone that resists its deployment and taking over of the reign of the country - Asad forces, AQ affiliated extremists etc., any one who attacks them.

 

[kalu_miah]

Like UN peacekeepers, but I have no trust in it that they really would be neutral, no country will trust them to enter, we prefer the UN which already is unfair and corrupt.

Since the world is not doing anything to stop the fighting and killing, then the world will have no choice but to accept OICPKF legitimacy, which has a membership of 57 countries. If Iran is expelled, it will still have membership of 56 countries. At least 50 countries will approve this proposal.

 

[Doritos11]

Since the world is not doing anything to stop the fighting and killing, then the world will have no choice but to accept OICPKF legitimacy, which has a membership of 57 countries. If Iran is expelled, it will still have membership of 56 countries. At least 50 countries will approve this proposal.

Your suggesting something that the syrian regime allegedly suggests aswell, UN elections, what is the point of OICPKF if they offer UN elections, all that has to be done is the FSA accept it.

 

[kalu_miah]

Your suggesting something that the syrian regime allegedly suggests aswell, UN elections, what is the point of OICPKF if they offer UN elections, all that has to be done is the FSA accept it.

Election cannot be done when there is fighting going on and people are getting killed. First peace has to be established by a superior force that has legitimacy in the world's eye. UN or anybody else is not coming in, so OICPKF is a proposed force that will do this job.

 

[Serpentine]

I think the immediate focus will be Syria and then after an initial success, they will look at other possible deployments to stop any ongoing conflict where large numbers are getting killed.

OICPKF will fight anyone that resists its deployment and taking over of the reign of the country - Asad forces, AQ affiliated extremists etc., any one who attacks them.

This whole peace keeping story will not work in Muslim countries, because they can barely do something together.look at OIC, it's function is as useful as a potato. Besides, I don't think any country will accept such force in its soil.or look ate UN peace keepers as example, they usually fail in all of their missions to sustain a permanent peace.

 

[Sinnerman108]

I do hope that u know that how ana allowed hamid karzai to come to power. Also I forgot the name of the Iraqi politician heads a political party now, shia by believes, heard him on bbc claiming that noori is in no position tomake any decisions on his own. And does all that is told to him from tehran. That is just one example. We after all are not blind, and unlike u iranians, dont even have a cult following where to us the word of khumenai is the word of god. How many Sunnis have u seen heading to Syria after the fatwas of Jihad from some corners.

Here, let me give u a hand ...
in your last post replace Iran with Shia.
it will make 100% sense.

 

[Declein]

Election cannot be done when there is fighting going on and people are getting killed. First peace has to be established by a superior force that has legitimacy in the world's eye. UN or anybody else is not coming in, so OICPKF is a proposed force that will do this job.

Your OICPKF would start shooting each other long before they reach Syria

On a serious note, your proposal would make sense in a perfect world - but since this one isn't perfect, countries have interests, and in Syria some countries have the interest to see Assad dead, some don't. All would just pick sides.

Btw, ONU has the same issue - in Yugoslavia everyone and their dog picked sides

 

[kalu_miah]

This whole peace keeping story will not work in Muslim countries, because they can barely do something together.look at OIC, it's function is as useful as a potato. Besides, I don't think any country will accept such force in its soil.or look ate UN peace keepers as example, they usually fail in all of their missions to sustain a permanent peace.

Well the US is getting ready for a no fly zone:
US 'considering military force in Syria' - Telegraph

But if the US fails to act then GCC nations who can afford it, can finance this project. Countries who will contribute will get more job allocations in GCC countries and countries who refuse, may face adverse consequences.

All the elements are there to make it work, question is if the decision makers will consider it, reach a decision and make a serious drive to make it happen.

Your OICPKF would start shooting each other long before they reach Syria

On a serious note, your proposal would make sense in a perfect world - but since this one isn't perfect, countries have interests, and in Syria some countries have the interest to see Assad dead, some don't. All would just pick sides.

Btw, ONU has the same issue - in Yugoslavia everyone and their dog picked sides

Yet after all these picking sides, Yugoslavia is a success story and so will OICPKF.

 

[Declein]

Yet after all these picking sides, Yugoslavia is a success story and so will OICPKF.

You don't know much about this area

First of all the USA needed to step in to make them finally stop, it wasn't ONU (in this case it was the Serbs, since they where on the receiving end)

Secondly, Kosovo still remains an unresolved issue. If you think that everyone will just call it a day and quit, you are sadly mistaken. It's just a pause

 

[kalu_miah]

You don't know much about this area

First of all the USA needed to step in to make them finally stop, it wasn't ONU (in this case it was the Serbs, since they where on the receiving end)

Secondly, Kosovo still remains an unresolved issue. If you think that everyone will just call it a day and quit, you are sadly mistaken. It's just a pause

As long as the pause holds and there is no killings going on, that is success. With moves towards EU membership, I doubt there will be a return to fighting:
Article > Assessing the western Balkans

OICPKF may or may not need US help, but with a large number of "peace keeping" boots on the ground which will provide the guarantee of a moderate democratic future for Syria, the US will be much more willing to provide temporary help. Help from any source should be appreciated.