AZADPAKISTAN2009
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2009
- Messages
- 37,669
- Reaction score
- 68
- Country
- Location
He could have given up his Nobel Peace award as collateral for the food he ate
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He'd already eaten. Not sure how India works, but normally any "sit-down" eatery in the US, you pay after you eat.
I don't think that they thought for a moment that he wasn't good for it. Most middle-class+ Americans have more than 1 credit card, so you just use another. Or pay cash. In the case of the President, he could ask to come back to pay (if it really got that bad), and they'd trust him for it. BTW, I've done that myself - ate at a local place, realized I'd left my wallet at home. They didn't make a big deal out of it, I went home, got my wallet, came back and paid them (with a very nice tip).
The golf course thing is completely different - that would be the Secret Service detail wanting to shut the whole place down for a day so the President can play golf. Declining that, particularly on short notice, is very understandable.
Could you expand? I can't tell if your being sarcastic, or if you want VIPs to be less pampered and exceptional.
Just imagine if it was Pakistan.
First of all, the president, in our case PM would not have gone to restaurant of commoners, even upscale commoners. If he had and his credit card was declined, the person swiping the card would have been roughed up. IF this was not enough, the restaurant would have been closed and its staff badly abused and bill not paid.
I went under the credit radar for nearly 12 yrs. Simply put, I lived within my means. If I wanted something, I saved enough for it. I bought only used cars and motorcycles. Never had any new vehicles in my life. I had literally no credit cards. In '07, I applied for a mortgage and found my credit score was 520. The first lender basically said he sees one or two persons like me per yr, those who are financially responsible, and there was nothing he could do for them, so then nothing for me. Not even the VA behind me was enough.Not quite true. It isn't how often you use your card that affects your credit rating..it's how many times you f*ck up and how long you own your cards.
For instance when I was in college in the mid 1980's I signed up for an American Express, a visa, and a mastercard from the student offers on a bulletin board on campus. I used them once in a while but not often. In 1992 I joined a database mining company that was used by a major credit card issuer. I was horrified at all the data I could query on people just through their credit card purchases (where they have been, what they buy, where/when they buy their gas, etc). I was so paranoid I put all my cards in a drawer and didn't use them again until thirteen years later (2005) In 2006 I applied for a mortgage and found my credit score was 820!!
For someone who didn't use his cards much in 20 years I certainly achieved a pretty good score.
The thing was I kept the same credit cards for 20+ years and since I didn't use them I didn't have any screw ups.
Edit 820...not 720
I went under the credit radar for nearly 12 yrs.
....
According to the Countrywide agent, the 520 score was simply because I must have some kind of a rating since I basically had no credit history to speak of.
.....
Personally, I think this credit rating thing is a sham.
Even though I don't live in the US anymore nor do I intend to ever return, I still maintain a credit-card to keep my FICO score out of fear :-DYou just made one simple mistake - you canceled your credit cards. I still have cards that say member since '88. One card I have used only once since getting it. NEVER cancel old cards...just don't use them.
People who jump from card to card don't realize what will happen.
One problem with the no-cancel strategy is hey are cracking down on "deadbeats" (people who never use their cards). I had to setup an autopay for one of my bills on one of my cards.
I haven't intentionally carried a balance past 30 days since probably 1989.
They probably even have 20% interest for all I know.
And yes the whole FICO thing is messed up. We have similar circumstances but the outcome was completely the opposite.