What's new

Obama says Myanmar needs to end discrimination of Rohingya to succeed

Dubious

RETIRED MOD
Joined
Jul 22, 2012
Messages
37,717
Reaction score
80
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
WASHINGTON | By Julia Edwards


U.S. President Barack Obama said on Monday Myanmar needs to end discrimination against Rohingya people if it wants to succeed in its transition to a democracy, something he has sought to make a legacy of his presidency.

Speaking to young Asians invited to the White House, Obama said the United States was focused on making sure Rohingya who have been subject to human trafficking or were adrift at sea were relocated.

He commended Indonesia and Malaysia for taking thousands of those displaced and said the United States would also take some.

But following on from a question about what was required for Myanmar to succeed in its U.S.-backed transition from decades of military rule, he said:

"I think one of the most important things is to put an end to discrimination against people because of what they look like or what their faith is. And the Rohingya have been discriminated against. And that’s part of the reason they’re fleeing."

Asked where he would want to be if he were a Rohingya, he said he thought he would like to stay where he was born.

"I would want to stay in the land where my parents had lived, but I’d want to make sure that my government was protecting me and that people were treating me fairly."

Obama has invested significant personal effort and prestige in promoting democracy in Myanmar, traveling there twice in the past three years to push what he has hoped to be a legacy issue and an element of his strategic rebalance to Asia in the face of a rising China.

However, concerns have grown in Washington about a slowing of reform and the treatment of the Rohingya, a minority living in apartheid-like conditions in Myanmar's Rakhine state.

Myanmar denies discriminating against the Muslim minority, but more than 100,000 have fled persecution and poverty since 2012.

Myanmar says the Rohingya are illegal migrants from neighboring Bangladesh, and denied during a 17-nation meeting in Bangkok last week that it was to blame for a crisis in recent weeks that has seen more than 4,000 Rohingya and Bangladeshi "boat people" arrive across Southeast Asia.

A U.S. State Department spokeswoman said earlier on Monday that Washington had asked Myanmar to allow the immediate disembarkation of and provision of humanitarian assistance to 727 migrants found packed aboard a boat in the Andaman Sea and being held offshore by Myanmar's navy.

(Reporting By Julia Edwards and Roberta Rampton; Writing by David Brunnstrom; Editing by Bill Trott and David Gregorio)


r

U.S. President Barack Obama speaks during a town hall meeting with Young Southeast Asian Leaders Initiative Fellows (YSEALI) at the White House in Washington June 1, 2015.
Reuters/Kevin Lamarque


Obama says Myanmar needs to end discrimination of Rohingya to succeed| Reuters
 
.
Burma’s Nowhere People

6:01 AM ET
rohingya-refugee-crisis-burma-myanmar.jpg

James Nachtwey for TIME A Rohingya child is registered at a temporary shelter in Indonesia in May.



Thousands of migrants have fled oppression only to meet death on the seas—or face an uncertain future in refugee camps


There are more than 50 million displaced people in the world today, the most since the end of World War II. Yet few of them have survived the kind of horrific journey that 12-year-old Atahurahman endured.

For 3½ months, he drifted across the Bay of Bengal, which separates India and Southeast Asia, to the Andaman Sea on what can only be described as a modern-day slave ship. The creaking vessel’s hold was retrofitted by human smugglers to carry more than 400 people packed so tightly together, they often sat with their arms cradling their bent knees. Twice-daily meals were limited to a handful of gruel and a few gulps of water. A couple of months into the trip, the captain and other gun-wielding traffickers abandoned ship, leaving the passengers to their fates. Food–even grains of uncooked rice–ran out.

Then began what one International Organization for Migration official described as “maritime ping-pong with human life.” Eager to make landfall in Malaysia, the migrants–a mix of ethnic Rohingya from Burma escaping persecution and Bangladeshis fleeing poverty–headed toward the jungle-choked coastline. But the Malaysian maritime force, under government orders to refuse such boats shelter, pushed the vessel north toward Thailand.

The Thai authorities fixed the boat’s engine and tossed some food and water to the passengers, who by this point were drinking their own urine. But they then towed the boat back to international waters, wanting nothing to do with the despondent human cargo. The cycle repeated itself: back to Malaysia, back to Thailand, back to Malaysia. Eventually an Indonesian helicopter hovered overhead, though that country’s navy initially blocked the boat as well. Three countries were rejecting a trawler filled with starving, dehydrated people, a floating human-rights tragedy.

On May 20, the vessel drifted toward Aceh, an Indonesian province at the northwestern tip of the island of Sumatra. There local fishermen finally guided the passengers to safety. A day after he had made landfall, Atahurahman, who is a Rohingya, walked dazed through a temporary camp set up by Acehnese officials. Women and children huddled in an abandoned paper plant, their occasional wails piercing the air. Men sprawled under tents. Medical staff tried to revive the sick, including toddlers with the swollen bellies of prolonged malnutrition. At least 10 others died en route and were thrown overboard, say those who survived the ordeal. “We thought we would die in the sea,” says Atahurahman.

Homeless

If all the uprooted individuals like Atahurahman around the world were to form their own country, they would make up the world’s 29th most populous nation, as big as South Korea. The recent increase in refugees is driven by conflict, especially in Syria, the Central African Republic and South Sudan, as well as by economic crisis. Already about 1,800 African and Middle Eastern migrants have perished in the Mediterranean this year, as overloaded boats sank before reaching Europe.

Yet of all the world’s desperate migrants, the Rohingya deserve special sympathy. A Muslim ethnic minority that lives in the west of Burma, known officially as Myanmar, the Rohingya are not simply poor and persecuted by members of the country’s Buddhist majority. They also lack the most fundamental measure of identity: citizenship. About 140,000 Rohingya have been herded by the government into fetid, disease-ridden camps since sectarian tensions with local Buddhists erupted in 2012. That violence, which disproportionately affected the Rohingya, culminated in what Human Rights Watch deemed “ethnic cleansing.” Visiting one such ghetto, a U.N. humanitarian-affairs official said she witnessed a level of suffering “I have personally never seen before.”

At least 200,000 Rohingya have sought refuge in neighboring Bangladesh, a country even poorer than Burma. The Burmese government maintains that the Rohingya aren’t Burmese at all because they are recently arrived illegal immigrants from Bangladesh, “Bengalis” who have flooded across the border. Yet many Rohingya have lived in Burma for generations and used to hold Burmese citizenship before laws changed in 1982. Unable to access normal schools and hospitals because of their official statelessness, Rohingya are also limited in whom they can marry and how many children they can bear. While international advocates as august as the Dalai Lama have rallied to their cause, Burma’s own human-rights icon Aung San Suu Kyi, the Nobel Peace Prize winner and democratic opposition leader, has declined to strenuously defend them. “The Rohingya have been discriminated against, significantly, and that’s part of the reason they are fleeing,” U.S. President Barack Obama told a group of Southeast Asian students at the White House on June 1.

It’s little wonder then that the Rohingya risk the journey to Muslim-majority Malaysia to endure menial jobs unwanted by locals. (Though cases of rape, torture and execution along the way have been recorded, it’s difficult to corroborate every story each Rohingya tells.) The route from western Burma’s Rakhine (or Arakan) state has taken them aboard rickety boats, often owned by Thais, to the Andaman Sea, then overland through the forests of Thailand into Malaysia. Often the price agreed upon back in Burma (or in refugee settlements in Bangladesh, another point of departure for migrants) changes en route, and the Rohingya, along with an increasing number of Bangladeshis, are imprisoned in camps until family members back home or in Malaysia pay up.

The crisis has spawned a new generation of homeless boat people, the largest in Asia since the end of the Vietnam War sent an estimated 800,000 fleeing communism by sea. Back then, the refugees were housed in camps across Southeast Asia and eventually made their way to new lives as far away as Europe and the U.S. From 2014 through early 2015, 88,000 Rohingya and Bangladeshis took to the sea, according to the U.N., with thousands perishing along the way. Some, after paying ransom to the traffickers, have returned to the camps and homes they once fled or have been picked up by the Burmese navy. “These trafficking syndicates have operated for years,” says Matthew Smith, executive director of Fortify Rights, a human-rights-focused NGO based in Bangkok. “But the current scale of death and abuse is unprecedented.”

Asia’s boat crisis has highlighted the powerlessness–or, more accurately, the deliberate frailty–of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), the region’s pale version of the E.U. While Southeast Asia is gaining economic muscle–the region is the world’s fifth largest economy–its political strength remains stunted. For all the criticism of the E.U.’s failures to save migrants in the Mediterranean, at least Europe has a policy. Hiding behind a commitment to noninterference in its 10 members’ domestic affairs, ASEAN has abdicated responsibility for protecting its most vulnerable residents.

Until May 20, Malaysia and Indonesia both refused official sanctuary to the boats, while Thailand is still shying away from a full welcome. A May 29 summit in Thailand on the boat crisis produced only weak statements–nothing specific about the Burmese authorities’ creating the conditions that have propelled the Rohingya to flee. Indeed, because the Burmese government, which has been applauded for initiating political and economic reform, refuses to acknowledge that such an ethnicity exists, the word Rohingya was excluded from the conference’s paperwork. “The international community has been shameful in its silence,” says Zafar Ahmad Abdul Ghani, president of the Myanmar Ethnic Rohingya Human Rights Organization Malaysia. “A slow genocide is happening, and the world looks away.”

Heart of Darkness

As reports by human-rights organizations have piled up, documenting the mistreatment of vulnerable migrants, Thailand and Malaysia have finally begun cracking down on the human-smuggling network that moves and often abuses them. But the results have been grim. In May, Thai authorities uncovered more than 30 migrants’ bodies near the Malaysian border. During another operation last month near the border with Thailand, Malaysian police discovered 139 graves strewn across the limestone hills. The remnants of death were everywhere: a stretcher made of branches used to carry bodies, reams of white cloth used to wrap the deceased in Muslim tradition and empty boxes of 9-mm bullets. Forensic specialists are still exhuming bodies, so the final death toll is not yet known. But the remains are believed to be those of Rohingya and Bangladeshis who perished in jungle camps where they were held hostage while smugglers awaited further payment.

“I am not surprised by the presence of smuggling syndicates,” Malaysian national police chief Khalid Abu Bakar told Time while visiting a makeshift police station near the hills riddled with graves. “But the depth of the cruelty, the torture, all this death–that has shocked me.” Some locals, though, are not surprised. One resident, who refused to give his name because of the sensitive nature of human trafficking, recalled seeing emaciated foreigners stumbling down the road near the entrance to a national park. They were wearing sarongs, the women’s heads covered by the kind of loose veils normally worn by Muslims in western Burma and Bangladesh. “We did nothing,” the villager says. “God help us for looking away.”

Shanu Binti Abdul Hussain says she, her three children and her brother-in-law–all Rohingya from western Burma–were imprisoned in a camp on the Thai side of the border for more than a month late last year. They were released only when her husband Mohamed Rafiq, who was already working in Malaysia’s Penang state, was able to meet a $4,150 ransom. “I thought, What if the money was too late?” he recalls. “What if one of my children has died?” The family now shares a house with five others in Penang, each household limited to a single room. Mohamed Rahman, the eldest son, 12, works bagging rice and onions for a grocer for $6 a day. He does not go to school.

It’s hard to imagine that human traffickers could have operated in border areas for so many years without official complicity. In May the mayor and deputy mayor of the Thai border town of Padang Besar were arrested in connection with the trade; on June 3 a senior Thai army officer surrendered to face charges linked to alleged human trafficking. As part of their crackdown, Malaysian police have detained two policemen. A Bangladeshi report published in local newspapers last month accused 24 police officers in Cox’s Bazar, the coastal area from which smugglers’ boats often launch, of complicity in trafficking. Shaidah, a Rohingya whose neighborhood in Burma was razed in 2012, spent three months living in a tent in a 200-person jungle camp in Thailand. When she trekked into Malaysia, she remembers uniformed men hustling her across the border.

New Beginnings

Despite the life-and-death risks, Asia’s human-trafficking trade will continue for the same reason illegal migration is on the rise globally–the market is simply too lucrative, and migrants are too desperate. Some aren’t even going voluntarily–Atahurahman and nine other boys on the ship that landed in Aceh on May 20 say they were kidnapped by traffickers trying to maximize profits by filling their boats before they set sail, collecting ransom during the journey.

Bangladesh’s Prime Minister, Sheik Hasina, has dismissed migrants from her country as “mentally sick.” The blame seems misplaced. Bangladeshi police say 300 or so human traffickers nationwide prey on unemployed youth and schoolboys by promising free passage to Southeast Asia, only to hold them for ransom later on. Besides, about 40% of Bangladeshis live on less than $1.25 a day. Is it really crazy to crave a better life abroad? The Rohingya have it even worse, although the U.S. has promised to resettle some refugees, as have the Philippines and, curiously, the tiny West African country of Gambia, whose citizens are themselves braving Mediterranean voyages to reach Europe.

Complicating the fate of the refugees is the difficulty of documenting exactly what has happened to them. Many of the Rohingya who made it to Aceh, after months at sea, told the same story to TIME about why they left Burma: villages burned, women raped, brothers or nephews or uncles or fathers killed. While the mistreatment of the Rohingya in Burma is well established, the sameness in their narratives is hard to evaluate. Did atrocities committed against their families force them onto the traffickers’ boats? Or were they coached to give similar stories in order to better their chances of getting refugee status–something that is known to happen?

At one of the Aceh camps, Atahurahman tells, unblinkingly, how his father was shot by Burmese police while they were confined to a camp. Yet the boy’s uncle, who lives in Malaysia, maintains that Atahurahman’s father died of heart disease after not being able to get to the hospital from the Rohingya ghetto. Which is the truth? Many of the Rohingya have no idea what day they left Burma or, indeed, what day it is now. They are illiterate and traumatized. After spending years wasting away in some of the world’s most squalid conditions, they face uncertain futures in temporary camps granted by foreign governments. Yet they had the strength to cross an ocean in search of a new life.

Atahurahman, though, has another ambition. “I want to see my mother again,” he says, blinking back tears. “I miss her very much.”

–WITH REPORTING BY MUKTITA SUHARTONO/ACEH, INDONESIA, AND FARID HOSSAIN/DHAKA, BANGLADESHN



Burma’s Migrants Flee Oppression Only to Die on the Seas

and meanwhile

Obama presses Mexico to help stop illegal immigration | TheHill



obama should give them US citizenship if he is so bothered , maybe he wants a second noble prize
@WebMaster @Horus @Manticore @Jungibaaz @Emmie @T-Faz @Chak Bamu @blain2 @TaimiKhan @waz

I am not sure how you guys tolerate this bloody troll who has so far shown what a big bigot he is ...He has bhagayratly trolled in ever thread dedicated to Rohingya ....


Forgive me for being direct but I hope he and his future generation experience the same or worse than maybe he will remember what a bigot he was being to the plight of others!

If he cant understand the catastrophe then he should just shut up...How hard could that POSSIBLY BE?
 
. .
Obama telling Suu Kyi , one hypocrite nobel peace prize winner to the other
Doesnt matter what matters is it is being brought to focus instead of even failing to acknowledge a problem as per Myanmar who wouldnt even recognize their own citizens!
 
. .
@WebMaster @Horus @Manticore @Jungibaaz @Emmie @T-Faz @Chak Bamu @blain2 @TaimiKhan @waz

I am not sure how you guys tolerate this bloody troll who has so far shown what a big bigot he is ...He has bhagayratly trolled in ever thread dedicated to Rohingya ....


Forgive me for being direct but I hope he and his future generation experience the same or worse than maybe he will remember what a bigot he was being to the plight of others!

If he cant understand the catastrophe then he should just shut up...How hard could that POSSIBLY BE?

i am just giving my opinion and not trolled , all i am saying is US has been a hypocrite for a long time , on one hand it bombs muslim countries and then goes on to put a visa ban on modi for ten years and then when the same man becomes india's PM they put a red carpet to welcome him , so they can't be taken seriously , my advise to you is be open to accept peoples opinions , this is an open forum .
 
.
my advise to you is be open to accept peoples opinions , this is an open forum .
My advice to you is to put your words in a humanistic manner or dont comment this isnt your paan shop where you visit to gossip and leave trails of red marks but a public forum where language, manners do matter!

i am just giving my opinion and not trolled , all i am saying is US has been a hypocrite for a long time , on one hand it bombs muslim countries and then goes on to put a visa ban on modi for ten years and then when the same man becomes india's PM they put a red carpet to welcome him , so they can't be taken seriously ,
Sadly, even then the world does listen to them and they have camera and light on them...so what they say does reach world level!

And since you removed your post this doesnt really sound humanistic no matter how you write it:

obama should give them US citizenship if he is so bothered , maybe he wants a second noble prize

Why the hell should the world do things and NOT ACKNOWLEDGE the shit Myanmar is doing? And grant the Rohingya their rights?
 
.
My advice to you is to put your words in a humanistic manner or dont comment this isnt your paan shop where you visit to gossip and leave trails of red marks but a public forum where language, manners do matter!


Sadly, even then the world does listen to them and they have camera and light on them...so what they say does reach world level!

And since you removed your post this doesnt really sound humanistic no matter how you write it:



Why the hell should the world do things and NOT ACKNOWLEDGE the shit Myanmar is doing? And grant the Rohingya their rights?

when you open a thread to discuss or debate an issue you must accept someones opinion which is different from your viewpoint , complaining about it makes you look childish. Human trafficking problems are there every where , this issue caught your attention because its muslims involved here , i see that as hypocrisy and i don't think myanmar is entirely to be blamed here , even you guys keep complaining how afghan illegal immigrants are a threat to your country and they should be sent back to afg from where they came, so does US have a problem with mexican immigrants and india with bd immigrants , things just went out of hand in myanmars case and US is not the best judge in these matter , a country which has committed so many human rights violations itself.

And i dint delete that post.
 
.
when you open a thread to discuss or debate an issue you must accept someones opinion which is different from your viewpoint , complaining about it makes you look childish.
Complaining about inhumane behaviour to those who run the forum is not childish...It is way better than taking the troll and dropping to his level only to be defeated due to his expertise in his game!

2ndly, difference in opinion is always welcomed but trolling is def not!

How about for once you spoke something about the plight of the people...You know something to do with the topic instead of steering it to attack Obama even though for once he managed to say something good for the benefit of other people....

BTW, my complain wasnt really aimed at this thread only but every thread relating to Rohingya and your replies on every thread where your idea of "difference of opinion" included EVERYTHING but the Rohingya people!

And you deleting your post proved that you yourself knew you were trolling!

So quit trying to look like an angel and making this about difference of opinion and behave like a human and own your mistake!

Human trafficking problems are there every where , this issue caught your attention because its muslims involved here ,
And again you missed the whole point of the thread!

You see once a troll always a troll!

i see that as hypocrisy and i don't think myanmar is entirely to be blamed here ,
This is difference of opinion but the reasoning is bigotry!

It is equal to saying the Farsi people in India dont deserve to be called citizens...after being granted the citizenship status:

The Burmese government maintains that the Rohingya aren’t Burmese at all because they are recently arrived illegal immigrants from Bangladesh, “Bengalis” who have flooded across the border. Yet many Rohingya have lived in Burma for generations and used to hold Burmese citizenship before laws changed in 1982.

So you see the bigotry in your attitude?

even you guys keep complaining how afghan illegal immigrants are a threat to your country and they should be sent back to afg from where they came,
This isnt about illegal immigrants but people who were given citizenship and stripped off it! Your attempt to derail is pathetic! Either you are less matured than a 10 yr old or you are just a troll!

We never reject any of the Pukhtoons who have citizenship ...In fact those who have NIC are considered Pakistani and not immigrants ...I also know how they are treated coz I had Cambodian friends who had Pakistani passport coz they went to Pakistan as a refugee during Khmer Rogue! And they have Pakistani passport...So before aimlessly being an asshole do some homework!

so does US have a problem with mexican immigrants and india with bd immigrants ,
Again as usual you didnt read the article and crawled in due to the title...This isnt about immigrants this is about snatched citizenship...If you cant stick to the topic I suggest shut up! Coz at least then you wont be embarrassing yourself on an international platform!

things just went out of hand in myanmars case and US is not the best judge in these matter , a country which has committed so many human rights violations itself.
As far as I know USA has not taken away citizenship of a type of people and started murdering them on their own soil! So I dont see the hypocrisy as per to say! Sure they did bad on other soil but NEVER STRIPPED CITIZENSHIP OF A TYPE OF PEOPLE... Until you get that in your brain, dont derail + troll my thread!

And i dint delete that post.
Then it is obvious it was derailing unless you claim that whoever did delete it didnt understand that you were giving a different opinion!
 
.
Doesnt matter what matters is it is being brought to focus instead of even failing to acknowledge a problem as per Myanmar who wouldnt even recognize their own citizens!
They are not Myanmar's citizens. That's what makes them stateless. What Obama says has no value on the ground. Myanmar is no India either.
 
.
They are not Myanmar's citizens. That's what makes them stateless. What Obama says has no value on the ground. Myanmar is no India either.
Maybe reading will enlighten to you out of your remarkable ignorance level!
many Rohingya have lived in Burma for generations and used to hold Burmese citizenship before laws changed in 1982.
 
. .
Irrelevant now. They are not local citizens. My point stands.
The whole article shows how this is wrong and what happened when they were stripped off their citizenship after being citizen...Which nation does that? The very fact blind hatred makes you support this is disturbing and disgusting!

Instead of calling a spade a spade you people are purely speaking out of bad habit! THAT part of my post still stands!
 
.
Which nation does that? The very fact blind hatred makes you support this is disturbing and disgusting!
An avenging and brave non Muslim nation does that. The Rohingyas started their cute Islamic ethnic cleansing program in 1947 itself, before Myanmar was fully independent. They drove the Burmese out of the land etc. It went on and eventually they were defeated much later. Even today they claim their own Islamic state in the North of Myanmar. You can accuse them of hating people who hate them. In that way - they are guilty.

But, the point stands. They are not Myanmarese.
 
.
An avenging and brave non Muslim nation does that.
brave? Blind hatred is not bravery!

They drove the Burmese out of the land etc. It went on and eventually they were defeated much later. Even today they claim their own Islamic state in the North of Myanmar. You can accuse them of hating people who hate them. In that way - they are guilty.
Kindly read history and state it as it is ...Its not Bollywood mirch masala when you talk about lives of people!

No one be they religious or not have behaved like this! But of course blind hatred and coupled with not being recognized some stories either never reach you or you shun a blind eye!

When British withdrew, the administration of Arakan division was entrusted to a Magh Buddhist extremist, U Kyaw Khine, with the power of commissioner of Arakan division. Many British soldiers left leaving behind a large number of arms, which easily reached the hand of Maghs.
The barbaric Muslim massacre started on 28th March 1942 at the order of Thakin leaders of Arakan. The Magh fell upon the innocent Muslims of Chanbilli village of Minbya Township. The carnage was unbelievable and hundreds of Muslims including children and women met their fatal end. Many Muslims jumped into the river and hid in the forest. People in water were shot dead. With their long swords the Maghs butchered the half-dead men, women and children. Those still alive in the carnage were stabbed with the pointed spears and cut them into pieces. Rohingya girls and women after having been raped were murdered and the children were mercilessly slaughtered by throwing them upward and putting the sharp side of the long-dahs or swords under them. The breasts of the women were peeled.
The same event of the tragic end of Shah Shuja and his followers in 1662 was just repeated once more in 1942. The Maghs of the neighbourhood carried away their cattle, rice, paddy and even clothes. The Thakin leaders took costly things like gold and silver and other booties were given to savage plunderers. The waters of the historic Lemro River had once more turned red with the blood of Muslims.
The next day on 29th March the armed Maghs attacked Lombaissor. The Rohingya resisted but were defeated and many Muslims were massacred. Like the daughter of Sultan Shuja many women in order to save their modesty threw themselves into the river. Some escaping group of 15000 Muslims were intercepted at Taungyi Nyo by the Maghs and were killed after looting their belongings. Women were killed after being raped for some days. Also, 10,000 men, women and children were killed at Apawkwa pass in the same way as Taungyi Nyo.
After destroying Chanbilli and Lambaissor in Minbya Township the Thakin attacked Raichaung and Pankha villages of Myebon Township on 1st April 1942. Almost all of 15,000 Muslims of these two villages were massacred.
Attempts were made to carry out massacre at Kyauknimaw of Ramree Township, but they were saved in a miraculous way. The Muslims of Kyaukpyu were given protection by British forces. On 8th April 1942 the Magh carried out the massacre at the villages of Kyauktaw, Mrohaung, Pauktaw and Rathidaung.
Abedin the richest man of Afouk (Apawkwa) used to say that “the Maghs are like dogs, if you throw bones at the dogs they are silent. Similarly if you give money to the Maghs they would not harm you.” But at the last moment his wealth could not save him. Although he narrowly escaped the massacre he had to breathe his last in refugee camps at Rangpur, needy and broken heart. It is one of the thousands of examples.
At the end of April the onslaught swept over the township of Rathidaung and Buthidaung. The villages up to Khwachoung in the township of Buthidaung were destroyed and burnt down. Taung Bazar, north of Buthidaung and its surrounding villages also came under Magh attack.
Three fourths of the Muslims of Rathidaung Township were massacred. The rest were lucky enough to reach Akyab. The Muslims of Akyab had the opportunity of acquiring some arms and training to defend themselves. Both offensive and defensive preparations of the Muslims in Akyab under the leadership of Sultan Mahmud, Tambi Maracan and others frightened the Maghs.
The result of the Muslim massacre of 1942 is that, 307 Muslim villages had disappeared from the soil of Arakan. More than 100,000 Muslims were massacred and 80,000 fled to Chittagong and Rangpur Refugee camps. The Muslim majority area of the east of Kaladan River had turned into a Muslim minority area. But the loss in terms of human civilisation and moral value is much greater. The 1942 massacre gave the scar mark of bitterness in the minds of the two-sister people against one another who, otherwise, peacefully co-existed in Arakan since 1200 years back.


The Muslim massacre of 1942

But, the point stands. They are not Myanmarese.
Who the hell are you to tell someone that? BTW, mr. highly ignorant it is Burmese!

If you have no idea who is ruling Myanmar it is a military rule ....The same rule if applied to india you would be on the streets in mins ....Sad hypocrisy of the typical indian troll!
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom