What's new

Nothing funny in Europe: Charlie Hebdo's 'right' to offend Muslims

Befitting reply. The Prophet is not shown in Bad light. And thats enough for sensibilities.
 
Why the outrage against depictions of the Prophet ? Apparently the Prophet has been depicted on numerous times during history by various Muslims including the Persians and the Ottoman Empire :undecided:
 
Xinjiang does not fire missiles at mainland China.

You, as everyone else knows that war has its own laws.
Use of white phosphorus and shelling UN schools may or may not be legal.
It all depends, so mentioning that without the conditions is meaningless propaganda.

Blowing up kids on beaches is never good, but again only real investigations show if it is a crime.

Stealing peoples properties, and then putting people in jail for complaining, is always repressive.
Of 1000 kerosene+oxygen filled tube fireworks merely one in year hits.
You are a full time shame less supporter of Israel steal someone's home kick him out a expect he well get rose petals in return for you.
And those kids killed on beach were proved.
Bombing of civilian structures is illegal but of course you are retard full time shame less supporter you will never except that your father did it wrong.
@Chinese-Dragon
 
Of 1000 kerosene+oxygen filled tube fireworks merely one in year hits.
You are a full time shame less supporter of Israel steal someone's home kick him out a expect he well get rose petals in return for you.
And those kids killed on beach were proved.
Bombing of civilian structures is illegal but of course you are retard full time shame less supporter you will never except that your father did it wrong.
@Chinese-Dragon

I am a part time supporter of International Law, with a tendency to criticize obvious propagandistas
which twists international law, into something else.
I find those mostly on the Palestinian side. Israelis are smarter than that.
They, in many cases violate the intention of International Law,
while they follow the letter of the Law.

You are a perfect example of this.

It is perfectly OK, according to International Law to bomb a civilian structure, if it has a military value.

Palestinians themselves create this military value by digging tunnels froms such buildings
and booby trapping the buildings. That makes them military targets.

Once this strategy is obvious, it is perfectly legal to blow civilian buildings to smithereens
before entering with soldiers.
It does not make it legal to blow up any building, just buildings that pose a treat.

If Hamas really wanted to protect its civilians, then they should have declared "protected areas".
They have not, so I guess they do not care about Palestinian lives.

I welcome the involvement of ICC in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict,
since it would be good once and for all determine what is legal.
I think that Palestinians in Gaza will have a better future once the leaders of Hamas and
Islamic Jihad is safely behind bars.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom