What's new

No Iraqi Al qaeda Connection Found

MastanKhan

PDF VETERAN
Joined
Dec 26, 2005
Messages
21,269
Reaction score
166
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
Exhaustive review finds no link between Saddam, al Qaida By Warren P. Strobel, McClatchy Newspapers
Mon Mar 10, 7:08 PM ET



WASHINGTON — An exhaustive review of more than 600,000 Iraqi documents that were captured after the 2003 U.S. invasion has found no evidence that Saddam Hussein's regime had any operational links with Osama bin Laden's al Qaida terrorist network.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Pentagon-sponsored study, scheduled for release later this week, did confirm that Saddam's regime provided some support to other terrorist groups, particularly in the Middle East , U.S. officials told McClatchy . However, his security services were directed primarily against Iraqi exiles, Shiite Muslims, Kurds and others he considered enemies of his regime.

The new study of the Iraqi regime's archives found no documents indicating a "direct operational link" between Hussein's Iraq and al Qaida before the invasion, according to a U.S. official familiar with the report.

He and others spoke to McClatchy on condition of anonymity because the study isn't due to be shared with Congress and released before Wednesday.

President Bush and his aides used Saddam's alleged relationship with al Qaida, along with Iraq's supposed weapons of mass destruction, as arguments for invading Iraq after the September 11, 2001 , terrorist attacks.

Then-Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld claimed in September 2002 that the United States had "bulletproof" evidence of cooperation between the radical Islamist terror group and Saddam's secular dictatorship.

Then-Secretary of State Colin Powell cited multiple linkages between Saddam and al Qaida in a watershed February 2003 speech to the United Nations Security Council to build international support for the invasion. Almost every one of the examples Powell cited turned out to be based on bogus or misinterpreted intelligence.

As recently as last July, Bush tried to tie al Qaida to the ongoing violence in Iraq . "The same people that attacked us on September the 11th is a crowd that is now bombing people, killing innocent men, women and children, many of whom are Muslims," he said.

The new study, entitled "Saddam and Terrorism: Emerging Insights from Captured Iraqi Documents", was essentially completed last year and has been undergoing what one U.S. intelligence official described as a "painful" declassification review.

It was produced by a federally-funded think tank, the Institute for Defense Analyses , under contract to the Norfolk, Va .-based U.S. Joint Forces Command.

Spokesmen for the Joint Forces Command declined to comment until the report is released. One of the report's authors, Kevin Woods , also declined to comment.

The issue of al Qaida in Iraq already has played a role in the 2008 presidential campaign.

Sen. John McCain , the presumptive GOP nominee, mocked Sen. Barack Obama , D-Ill, recently for saying that he'd keep some U.S. troops in Iraq if al Qaida established a base there.

"I have some news. Al Qaida is in Iraq ," McCain told supporters. Obama retorted that, "There was no such thing as al Qaida in Iraq until George Bush and John McCain decided to invade." (In fact, al Qaida in Iraq didn't emerge until 2004, a year after the invasion.)

The new study appears destined to be used by both critics and supporters of Bush's decision to invade Iraq to advance their own familiar arguments.

While the documents reveal no Saddam-al Qaida links, they do show that Saddam and his underlings were willing to use terrorism against enemies of the regime and had ties to regional and global terrorist groups, the officials said.

However, the U.S. intelligence official, who's read the full report, played down the prospect of any major new revelations, saying, "I don't think there's any surprises there."

Saddam, whose regime was relentlessly secular, was wary of Islamic extremist groups such as al Qaida, although like many other Arab leaders, he gave some financial support to Palestinian groups that sponsored terrorism against Israel .

According to the State Department's annual report on global terrorism for 2002— the last before the Iraq invasion— Saddam supported the militant Islamic group Hamas in Gaza , Palestinian Islamic Jihad and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine-General Command , a radical, Syrian-based terrorist group.

Saddam also hosted Palestinian terrorist Abu Nidal , although the Abu Nidal Organization was more active when he lived in Libya and he was murdered in Baghdad in August 2002 , possibly on Saddam's orders.

An earlier study based on the captured Iraqi documents, released by the Joint Forces Command in March 2006 , found that a militia Saddam formed after the 1991 Persian Gulf war, the Fedayeen Saddam, planned assassinations and bombings against his enemies. Those included Iraqi exiles and opponents in Iraq's Kurdish and Shiite communities.

Other documents indicate that the Fedayeen Saddam opened paramilitary training camps that, starting in 1998, hosted "Arab volunteers" from outside of Iraq . What happened to the non-Iraqi volunteers is unknown, however, according to the earlier study.

The new Pentagon study isn't the first to refute earlier administration contentions about Saddam and al Qaida.

A September 2006 report by the Senate Intelligence Committee concluded that Saddam was "distrustful of al Qaida and viewed Islamic extremists as a threat to his regime, refusing all requests from al Qaida to provide material or operational support."

The Senate report, citing an FBI debriefing of a senior Iraqi spy, Faruq Hijazi , said that Saddam turned down a request for assistance by bin Laden which he made at a 1995 meeting in Sudan with an Iraqi operative.

ON THE WEB:
 
.
Maureen Dowd
International Herald Tribune
04-20-2004
When Colin Powell decided that Dick Cheney's crazy ''fever,'' as he called the vice president's obsession with linking Sept. 11 and Saddam, was leading the country into a war it did not need to fight, he should have bared his heart to the president and made his case using the Powell doctrine with overwhelming force. President George W. Bush probably wouldn't have listened. He was in Cheney's gloomy sway, and Donald Rumsfeld's bellicose sway. And W. felt competitive with his more popular top diplomat. But Powell should have tried. And if the president didn't listen, the secretary should have quit not let himself be used by the vice ...
 
.
Maureen Dowd
International Herald Tribune
04-20-2004
When Colin Powell decided that Dick Cheney's crazy ''fever,'' as he called the vice president's obsession with linking Sept. 11 and Saddam, was leading the country into a war it did not need to fight, he should have bared his heart to the president and made his case using the Powell doctrine with overwhelming force. President George W. Bush probably wouldn't have listened. He was in Cheney's gloomy sway, and Donald Rumsfeld's bellicose sway. And W. felt competitive with his more popular top diplomat. But Powell should have tried. And if the president didn't listen, the secretary should have quit not let himself be used by the vice ...

MK-the whole world knew this fact except for GW and his lap-dog Tony Blair but the world also wanted to get rid of the tyrant S.Hussain so it was a great set-up.
 
.
Ithink even they knew but they had to pin something on Saddam to get rid of him. I often think how the twin towers conveniently opened the minds of millions of people into blindly believing anything that their Govt fed them, when just basic research would have told them otherwise. The Muslim world has cried itself hoarse saying the same thing but nobody listened. How can somebody from the Baathist movement which was totally athiest suddenly develop links with a so called Muslim organization.
Araz
 
.
Same way they pinned democracy on Musharraf.

Had any one read 'America's War on Terrorism'

I have the ebook, if any one like to have it and if WebMaster agrees, than I can send it to him (WM) and he can distribute it further.
 
.
Araz,

I knew it was a fake---majority knew that it was fake---you knew it was fake----the world knew it was fake---but what tears up my heart is that not enough was done to stop this invasion---the muslim leadership in both the nations of iraq and afghanistan failed miserably---Saddam---out of his arrogance right till the end---the interview with his caretaker showed that iraq meant nothing to him---it was all him----it was all about Saddam right till the hangman's noose around his neck---defiant right to the end---iraq didnot mean much to him if he was not the king---.


Mullah Omar on the other hand had no clue what he was getting into---no vision---when did a revolutionary ever had a vision---did Arafat have a vision at the summit in 98-99 when he could have 90% of what he wanted---they all were revolutionary right till the end---war was it that kept them going---someone ask Mullah Omar---what was he thinking---like saddam he didn't believe that the u s would invade---they thought that they would do the same to the americans---they thought like the phoenix---the afghanis would arise out of the ashes and come victorious one more time.

People are so callous and non-challant when it comes to dealings with their nation---their country---their homeland---we simply just don't know how precious this commodity is---. It takes a moments indecision to destroy a nation---it takes centuries to build it back.

You will see that pretty soon more americans would stand up---more of them would apologize for what happened in iraq and afghanistan but it would not bring things back to the days of old. Too much blood has soaked into the ground---to much land has been destroyed. They will go away and we will be left holding the broken pieces.
 
.
MK
Brother, i am in agreement with you .However my understanding is that whereas Saddam acted all along like a moron, The Taliban-------atleast from the interviews that their designated froeign minister gave, wanted Americans to approach them directly with a case for OBL extradition and prove to them that the said person needed to be extradited. However, where they failed miserably was in their assessment of the american response. I suspect the Americans wanted to Bomb something and everything. They have always chosen targets which are weak and cannot respond---like Iraq , and I repeat Iraq and Afghanistan. I bet you anything they would not want to take on a fight with Iran inspite of its depleted Airforce and novice Navy and Armed forces. As to the muslim world, it is full of self serving megalomaniacs and sycophantic morons who are so afraid of loosing their thrones that they will do anything at anybody,s behest including Israel. Afghanistan should have asked OBL to leave and said that the said person has left the country and extradited to Saudi Arabia and let the Americans and the Saudis deal with their own mess. You are right, they probably did not have the vision.
I also have a theory that Muush should have announced his support for the war on terror but then negotiated a better deal. I have always felt that he capitulated a bit too soon, unlike Zia who could call anybody,s bluff and get away with it.
Love to hear your views on this one.
WaSalam
Araz
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom