New York Times: Squeezed by an India-China Standoff, Bhutan Holds Its Breath

[Srinivas]

The writer is Steven Lee Myers. I bet that "Lee" had a pretty strong role to play when he penned the anti-India article.

The Chinese don't know that the Bhutanese don't trust the Chinese at all.

Actually china is not a player in this region at all until late 1780's. This region is contested between Nepal, Sikkim,Tibet and Bhutan.

To the Chinese author who wrote this article, the world is witnessing how 1.3 billion people are getting suffocated under cpc. Especially Tibetans and xingxiang who were under occupation.

 

[Dungeness]

Actually china is not a player in this region at all until late 1780's. This region is contested between Nepal, Sikkim,Tibet and Bhutan.

To the Chinese author who wrote this article, the world is witnessing how 1.3 billion people are getting suffocated under cpc. Especially Tibetans and xingxiang who were under occupation.

Maybe. And India had nothing to do with the whole NE region until 1947.

 

[Jackdaws]

Maybe. And India had nothing to do with the whole NE region until 1947.

Is that the narrative in the little Red Book of Mao?

 

[Srinivas]

Maybe. And India had nothing to do with the whole NE region until 1947.

We have epics which date back to 4000 years which mention these kingdoms as a pArt of Bharata Varsha, ancient India.

Cpc is not a legitimate successor to democratic china. Cpc has no right to quote British treaties.

 

[Dungeness]

Is that the narrative in the little Red Book of Mao?

Not only that, Tamil had nothing to do with India either until 1947:

 

[gslv mk3]

Not only that, Tamil had nothing to do with India either until 1947:

Being stupid is not a crime.

 

[Dungeness]

We have epics which date back to 4000 years which mention these kingdoms as a pArt of Bharata Varsha, ancient India.

Cpc is not a legitimate successor to democratic china. Cpc has no right to quote British treaties.

Epic? Yeah, you had spacecraft 6000 years ago.

 

[Jackdaws]

Not only that, Tamil had nothing to do with India either until 1947:

View attachment 418924

Sure. Why don't you issue a fresh warning?

 

[Areesh]

Being stupid is not a crime.

That is why you bharatis don't have any problem being one.

 

[gslv mk3]

That is why you bharatis don't have any problem being one.

Don't you think that description would fit your illiterate population better ?

 

[Areesh]

Don't you think that description would fit your illiterate population better ?

No that fits your delusional, ignorant and ugly population more.

http://www.huffingtonpost.in/2016/1...ecome-the-most-ignorant-nation-in_a_21628333/

 

[gslv mk3]

No that fits your delusional, ignorant and ugly population more.

Some random survey means nothing, illiterate Pakistani

 

[Areesh]

Some random survey means nothing, illiterate Pakistani

Some random survey means you are stupid ignorant bharati.

 

[Dungeness]

Some random survey means nothing, illiterate Pakistani

The survey may not mean anything until your lot backed it up.

 

[gslv mk3]

The survey may not mean anything until your lot backed it up

like claiming that Tamil Nadu has nothing to do with India ?