SarthakGanguly
BANNED
- Joined
- May 10, 2013
- Messages
- 18,416
- Reaction score
- 7
- Country
- Location
That was the logic given by David Irving. Speer says otherwise. He was the Minister of War from 43 onwards. He said that the resources if diverted to fighter production, could have enabled German night fighter defences to withstand enemy bombing. Remember that the V2 was produced at the expense of the Me-s and FWs.For the same amount of money that Fuhrer spent on building V2's he could have got 90,000 Tiger Tanks. But Germany's problem ( after defeat at Stalingrad forced Wehrmacht to withdraw from caucus' s oilfields) was that there was simple not enough fuel to run even existing Tanks, let alone thousands of new Tanks. V2 rockets consumed Ethanol, not Gasoline, which could be easily procured by fermenting beet root crop from continental Europe.
Firing V2's was the reason why Hitler insisted on holding Pae-d-Calaise till it became impossible to hold it.
Hitler needed an offensive weapon to hit London instead of having defensive fighters protecting the Reich's own skies. Even without Caucasus, the Third Reich would have done well - indeed Panzer production continued to the end and were more supplied than the air forces at all times. The war was lost before but it was quickened because the synthetic oil refineries that converted coal to gas were bombed from middle of 44. Had Speer been given the resources to get more fighters in the air, Germany could have fought on for much longer. You can also read Adolf Galland and Ernst Udet's memoirs as well. The latter remained a convinced Nazi after the war also.
Both actually - this was called Ersatz fuel.Beetroot?
Or Was it potatoes?? The video posted above says V2 needed 30 tons of potatoes.