Naxals have killed more Indian security forces than Kasmiris

[Safriz]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1235555823754940416

 

[Safriz]

Today another 17 Indian security forces were killed by Naxals.
I wonder what Modi is playing this time.

 

[gangsta_rap]

point being?

 

[Safriz]

point being?

if you dont see the point, dont comment.

 

[gangsta_rap]

if you dont see the point, dont comment.

i can say that the war on terror has unfortunately resulted in more civilian deaths for pakistanis than the wars with india - but there's no point in saying that now is there

 

[Safriz]

i can say that the war on terror has unfortunately resulted in more civilian deaths for pakistanis than the wars with india - but there's no point in saying that now is there

I was politely asking you to Butt out of the thread as i dont like so called Pakistanis like you , who think that rubbishing Pakistan to save indian arse is "Patriotism".
The thread is not about Pakistan. It is about an insurgency ongoing in India , and about which people dont hear much, because every single terror related death in Pakistan is shouted from rooftops for ulterior motives, but similar incidents in India and elsewhere are hushed up.
If highlighting something bad about India gives you diarrhoea, why not keep away from such threads?

 

[Baba_Yaga]

Naxals have killed far more security forces and civillians because there is no one tackling them in a proper manner.
Unlike the Kashmir insurgency, there is no army involved in tackling them, just paramilitary forces who neither have the proper equipment nor the training. Moreover, they are explicitly forbidden from using any kind of artillery/helicopter gunships.

For decades, the political class has taken "sympathy" on them because at the end of the day, these Naxals are fighting for/or think they are fighting for the rights of the poor and the landless. Their ultimate goal is to overthrow the political elite and establish a socialist state as envisioned by Karl Marx. Unlike the Kashmir agency, which we clearly see as bad, since they are fighting for a separate country, The Naxal insurgency is pretty complex and it is hard to see it in black or white terms for us. They still have support from the tribals living in remote jungles, most of whom are extremely poor. Many of these naxals infact haven't ever picked up a gun and simply support the movement.

While people like me propose an all out operation to wipe them out, there are many who think it will further alienate the poor and give a message to the tribal and landless that the government doesn't care about them. I don't agree with that perspective, but I do understand it. For now, the government strategy is to eliminate this insurgency by development of the tribal regions and limited paramilitary and commando operations against the violent naxal fighters, while not causing harm to their civilian supporters.

 

[JafarQureshi]

point being?

Point is China is better than Pakistan in unconventional warfare.

 

[Safriz]

Naxals have killed far more security forces and civillians because there is no one tackling them in a proper manner.
Unlike the Kashmir insurgency, there is no army involved in tackling them, just paramilitary forces who neither have the proper equipment nor the training. Moreover, they are explicitly forbidden from using any kind of artillery/helicopter gunships.

For decades, the political class has taken "sympathy" on them because at the end of the day, these Naxals are fighting for/or think they are fighting for the rights of the poor and the landless. Their ultimate goal is to overthrow the political elite and establish a socialist state as envisioned by Karl Marx. Unlike the Kashmir agency, which we clearly see as bad, since they are fighting for a separate country, The Naxal insurgency is pretty complex and it is hard to see it in black or white terms for us. They still have support from the tribals living in remote jungles, most of whom are extremely poor. Many of these naxals infact haven't ever picked up a gun and simply support the movement.

While people like me propose an all out operation to wipe them out, there are many who think it will further alienate the poor and give a message to the tribal and landless that the government doesn't care about them. I don't agree with that perspective, but I do understand it. For now, the government strategy is to eliminate this insurgency by development of the tribal regions and limited paramilitary and commando operations against the violent naxal fighters, while not causing harm to their civilian supporters.

It's more to do with Muslims Vs non Muslims.
Kashmiri are Muslims , so any little thing they do is far worse than one of your own , non Muslim Naxals do.

 

[Baba_Yaga]

It's more to do with Muslims Vs non Muslims.
Kashmiri are Muslims , so any little thing they do is far worse than one of your own , non Muslim Naxals do.

No, it is more like Separatists vs Non Separatists. Kashmiris are fighting for a separate country, while Naxals are fighting to establish India as a socialist state where the worker owns the means of production as per Karl Marx's principles. Naxals come from a variety of backgrounds, muslim, hindu, christian, speak different languages. The only thing that unites them is that they are really poor and they all believe in the same cause. Of course, if you've already made up your mind what to believe, can't say anything.

 

[Kaniska]

It's more to do with Muslims Vs non Muslims.
Kashmiri are Muslims , so any little thing they do is far worse than one of your own , non Muslim Naxals do.

No...It is about Kashmir separatism talks about dividing our nation where as Naxals are hard core communist and they are against capitalism...

So regular like me do not mind acceding to few demands of Naxals where as we do not have any public support for Kashmir separatism...

ULFA was a Hindu people led organization which was fighting for separate home land...Indian security forces brutally crushed many of their people even though they are Hindus...

 

[Safriz]

No, it is more like Separatists vs Non Separatists. Kashmiris are fighting for a separate country, while Naxals are fighting to establish India as a socialist state where the worker owns the means of production as per Karl Marx's principles. Naxals come from a variety of backgrounds, muslim, hindu, christian, speak different languages. The only thing that unites them is that they are really poor and they all believe in the same cause. Of course, if you've already made up your mind what to believe, can't say anything.

Those who eat cow are not separatist Muslims? Then why they get lunched and nobody gets punished for that?

 

[Baba_Yaga]

Those who eat cow are not separatist Muslims? Then why they get lunched and nobody gets punished for that?

Hindus who eat cow are also lynched. A months ago, a Hindu trader carrying buffalo meat was caught, people mistook it for cow meat and lynched him. They do not get punished because it is extremely difficult to punish a mob. In the history of India, I doubt a mob has ever been brought to justice. If it was 3-4 people lynching 1 person, it would be easy to punish them, but these incidents involve dozens of people.

Besides, lynching incidents are not widespread. There have been about 20 lynching incidents since Modi took power in 2014.

 

[Kaniska]

Those who eat cow are not separatist Muslims? Then why they get lunched and nobody gets punished for that?

Simple answer...we are bullshit people who can not protect our own people...

Now..i will ask the same question to you...Your country is created for Muslims only...There in your 70 year of history, where there are racial killings in the name of different sects??? Now for God’s sake...do try to run away by saying that these killings has nothing to do with Pakistan..either Saudis are fault or Iranian are bad....

Hindus who eat cow are also lynched. A months ago, a Hindu trader carrying buffalo meat was caught, people mistook it for cow meat and lynched him. They do not get punished because it is extremely difficult to punish a mob. In the history of India, I doubt a mob has ever been brought to justice. If it was 3-4 people lynching 1 person, it would be easy to punish them, but these incidents involve dozens of people.

Besides, lynching incidents are not widespread. There have been about 20 lynching incidents since Modi took power in 2014.

Many people do not know that Hindus in NE and South India consume beef too...