None of what you've written makes any sense at all. You're confusing political parties, terrorist groups and twitter accounts all with one another.
Let's go one by one.
TTP = PTM? These are practically polar opposite movements; TTP is a Islamist terrorist organization which was created by the CIA in 2006 to counter the ISI's support of the Afghan Taliban. PTM is a Pashtun rights advocacy movement - the demands they're asking for are not wrong and yes they are being taken advantage of by foreign intelligence agencies, but the question remains...why give them an opportunity in the first place? You reap what you sow.
ANP has no interest in a "Pashtunistan", they are advocating Pashtun rights. ANP is a liberal, secular oriented party. If they were to ever create a Pashtunistan, they would NEVER be elected into power again because of the vast majority of Pashtuns are not secular or liberal and would view ANP with contempt as soon as they started promoting a "yahoodi agenda" in an independent Pashtunistan.
BLA is a terrorist organization controlled by a handful of Sardars. You probably mean to say BNP (Balochistan National Party), which operates along the same lines as the ANP. They are advocating Baloch rights - if you read the charter of the BNP is clearly states they want to protect Baloch rights within the federation of Pakistan.
PMLN has no interest in a "Greater Punjab" either. First of all, under no circumstances would the Seraiki belt in Southern Punjab, the former Bahawalpur State or Northern Punjab (Potohar) ever agree to this. The only REAL Punjab in the province of Punjab are the districts surrounding Lahore. The rest of "Punjab" is not Punjab and the people there would never support it. Furthermore, as mentioned above, it makes no sense to create a "Punjabistan", because you'd be losing your ports in Karachi and Gwadar. An independent Khalistan on the otherhand, would be great for both (Pakistan and Khalistan), which I've highlighted above.
What's this then?