What's new

Naval Artillery

Manticore

RETIRED MOD
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
10,115
Reaction score
114
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Naval artillery - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
List of naval guns by caliber - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
List of naval guns by country - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
List of naval anti-aircraft guns - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Guided missiles began to replace naval artillery as more effective weapons against aircraft and ships in the mid-20th century. Naval artillery calibers greater than 5 inches (13 cm) were used primarily for naval gunfire support after 1944; and no new ships were built with larger naval artillery. Submarines shed deck guns as a handicap in modern naval tactics. Destroyers and frigates carry a single gun of 3- to 5-inch calibre (76.2-127mm) as a backup to missile systems and capable of land fire support. Remaining roles of naval artillery like the 20mm Phalanx CIWS system are for short-range defence against targets which cannot be engaged by guided weapons systems. The US 5"/54 caliber Mark 45 gun is capable of firing 20 rounds per minute to a range of 20 miles.[citation needed]
In the early 21st century the use of railguns mounted on ships is under study
 
The Naval Ordnance Field this rapidly evolving for some time the classic artillery had been confined to sparsely scope increased from one generation to another and roles decrescientes progress against other weapons such as missiles, the situation is changing because they are shuffling different types of artillery ranging from classical chemical artillery, artillery passes through electro-magnetic and peers with increasingly artillery force of pure energy or laser, and widely investigated by the U.S. Air Force.
Recent chemical artillery that are entering in action these days represent increases of 400% in respect of the above and with accuracy and terminal guidance, unknown to this type of ammunition, missiles meantime have increased only 200% scope but in terms of accuracy Progress has been more modest. This situation will quickly obsolete things the first and second generations in some cases Missile Mar Mar, both in scope and absolutely for the cost between a missile and a million dollars and save a few thousand dollars.
was also study the debut of Electro Magnetic artillery, with absolutely strategic scope and capabilities. adjacent tables are a compilation of the features of the latest naval artillery and less, so it is not always easy to collect information, in several cases there are genuine empty, we hope to go later clarifying (pale yellow boxes are estimated values) the new generation of naval artillery Chemistry, reached such levels that reminded me of a story about a legendary piece of artillery that the Germans put into operation shortly before end of the First World War, is the "canon of Paris", whose powerful feature has never been re-achieved in an operational state, a situation that new pieces of 127 mm OTO-Melara of Defense and United have reached 90 years later ..... It's like installing "a canon of Paris" in a frigate and with the addition of an excellent rate of fire and deadly accuracy! Finally I submit a link to a promotional video of the Oto-Melara Signature (In -English) but very "educational" about XXI century naval operations.



lP8HU.jpg
02QIw.jpg
2BeYI.jpg
z26Uu.jpg




credits - MC72

original post in spanish [defensa.pe]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Naval Guns

The general mission of naval fire support is to destroy, neutralize, or suppress enemy targets that oppose our forces. Naval fire support may be provided by naval gunfire and naval air power. Usually, it is delivered in concert with supporting fires from other arms.
The fire support system is made up of three distinct components that function together to give the commander the fire support he needs to accomplish his mission. These three components are as follows:
Command, control, and communications (C3) systems, facilities, and personnel required to manage fire support and to direct those tactical and technical/ actions needed to attack targets quickly and effectively.
Target acquisition systems needed to acquire targets by reconnaissance, surveillance, and devices. These systems include many individuals, units, and resources on the battlefield that help detect the to enemy.
Weapons and ammunition to deliver the firepower on the target according to the commander's battle plan.
The key to effective fire support is the force commander's ability to bring these assets to bear on the enemy in an integrated and coordinated manner.
Since 1992, when it retired the last of its battleships, the Navy's surface fire support capabilities have been limited to 5-inch/54 caliber guns and munitions that lack adequate range, accuracy, and lethality. Targeting and fire control are still done manually, and the Navy acknowledges that the communications links between fire support ships and their customers are inadequate. A growing threat from sea-skimming antiship missiles is forcing fire support ships to operate at ever increasing ranges from shore, further limiting the utility of existing guns.
The Navy plans to address its surface fire support capability deficiencies in two phases, near- (scheduled completion by fiscal year 2001) and long-term (time frame still being defined). During the near-term phase, the Navy is developing (1) a modified version of the 5-inch gun currently used on surface combatant ships, (2) an extended range guided 5-inch munition, and (3) a shipboard surface fire support warfare control system consisting of computer resources and communication interfaces designed to automate battle management functions.
The variety of projectiles, powder charges, and fuzes permits selection of optimum combinations for the attack of targets. Fuzes, for example, can be set to provide for air, surface, or subsurface detonation of rounds. The high muzzle velocity and relatively flat trajectory of the naval gun make it suitable for direct fire or assault fire, particularly against materiel targets that must be penetrated or destroyed and that present a vertical face. The large volume of fire that can be delivered in a relatively short time is a distinct advantage in delivering neutralization fires. For example, the 5-inch/54-caliber gun has a rate of fire of 35 rounds per minute at the maximum rate and 20 rounds per minute at the sustained rate. The normal dispersion pattern is narrow in deflection and long in range. Very close supporting fire can be delivered when the GT line is parallel to the front line. This pattern also permits effective coverage of such targets as roads and runways when the GT line coincides with the long axis of the target.
The relatively flat trajectory of naval gunfire results in a large range probable error. Therefore, the dispersion pattern of the naval gun is roughly elliptical, with the long axis in the direction of fire. Before selecting naval gunfire as the proper fire support means, the FSCOORD must consider the GT line and its relation to the forward line of own troops (FLOT). The hydrographic conditions of the sea area in which the naval gunfire ship must operate may be unfavorable. It may cause undesirable firing positions or require firing at longer ranges. The accuracy of naval gunfire depends on the accuracy with which the position of the firing ship has been fixed. Navigational aids, prominent terrain features, or radar beacons emplaced on the shore may be used to compensate for this limitation. Bad weather and poor visibility make it difficult to determine the position of the ship by visual means and reduce the observer's opportunities for locating targets and adjusting fires. Bad weather also might force the ship out to sea. If the ship is firing while under way, the line of fire in relation to the frontline may change. This could require cancellation of the fire mission, because the inherent large range probable errors may endanger friendly forces.
The sole means of between ship and shore is radio. Normally, several nets are established to control and coordinate the support. Radio communications can be interrupted by equipment limitations, enemy EW, and unfavorable atmospheric conditions.
If the naval gunfire ship comes under enemy surface, subsurface, and/or air attack, the ship may cancel its fire mission with the ground forces and try to counter this threat. The shore bombardment allowance varies with the ship type (600 to 1,800 rounds). When the need arises, remaining rounds will be held for self-defense of the ship. The first priority of the ship is self-preservation. The ship will interrupt its support mission if its survival is threatened. This includes ammunition expenditure. Since naval guns are, in addition to shore bombardment, used for ship or fleet defense, the ship will keep a large percentage of its magazine capacity for this contingency.
When naval fire support is available and the general tactical situation permits its use, naval firepower can provide large volumes of devastating, immediately available, and instantly responsive fire support to combat forces operating near coastal waters. These fires may be in support of amphibious operations within range of naval aircraft and gunfire, but they also may be made available to support land operations.
Naval gunfire ships are assigned one of two missions - direct support or general support. Relationships between assigned ships and supported ground force units are based on limited, delegated responsibility. For example, a ship placed in support provides the requested fire within its capability, but ship positioning and method of delivery are at the discretion of the ship captain. The supported ground force unit selects the targets, the timing of fires on the targets, and the adjustment of fires.
A ship in direct support (IX) of a specific troop unit delivers both planned and call fires. Call fires are to the ship what targets of opportunity are to artillery units. A naval gunfire spotter with the supported unit conducts and adjusts call fires. Call fires also may be adjusted by a naval gunfire air spotter. Members of the air and naval gunfire liaison company (ANGLICO) are specially trained in conducting naval gunfire. However, the procedures are simplified and standardized so that any trained supporting arms observer can effectively adjust the fire of a ship. Naval gunfire (NGF) DS is not the same as field artillery (FA) DS. A direct support ship will respond to calls for fire from units other than the supported unit when ordered to do so by the fire support group commander, the division naval gunfire officer, or the brigade NGLO.
General support (GS) missions are assigned to ships supporting units of brigade size or larger. The normal procedure is for the fires of the GS ship to be adjusted by an aerial observer or for the liaison officer (LO) to assign the fires of the ship to a battalion spotter for fire missions. In the latter case, on completion of the mission, the ship reverts to general support. Prearranged fires are delivered in accordance with a schedule of fire
ANGLICO personnel are available to advise unit commanders from company through division levels on how to best use the naval air and gunfire support available to them. Liaison personnel can give unit commanders and FSCOORDs information on weapon ranges, ammunition effects, all-weather bombing capabilities, and landing zone requirements.
The only US NGF weapon system available now is the 5-inch/54 found primarily on destroyers.

1PnIp.gif


Naval Guns

9Ed70.png






Phalanx_CIWS
Specifications (Block 1A/B)



Block 1B Phalanx, with the improved barrel and FLIR.
Gun: 1× 20 mm (0.79 in) M61 Vulcan 6-barreled gatling cannon[4]
Height: 4.7 m (15 ft 5.0 in)
Weight: 12,500 lb (5,700 kg), later models 13,600 lb (6,200 kg)[1]
Elevation −25° to +85°
Muzzle velocity: 3,600 m/s (12,000 ft/s)
Rate of fire: 4,500 rounds/minute.
Maximum burst size: 1000 rounds.
Ammunition capacity: 1,550 rounds.
Radar: Ku band.
100% Kill distance: Classified.
Cost: $35 million


800px-Phalanx_CIWS_test_fire_-_081107-N-5416W-003.jpg
 
Type 730 CIWS
Tz3vG.jpg


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_730_CIWS
China's Phalanx

In the last five years, China has been installing a Chinese designed Type 730 30mm CIWS (Close In Weapon System) on its destroyers and newest frigates, while planning an update that adds short range missiles.

Costing some $5.4 million dollars per unit, and weighing eight tons, the seven barreled, 110 inch long, cannon resides in a box shaped turret providing point defense against anti-ship missiles, aircraft, coastal targets, small boats and mines. With a rate of fire of 4,200-5,800 rounds per minute (rpm), the gun is fed from twin 500 round boxes and fires either High Explosive or Armor Piercing shells. By virtue of its caliber, performance exceeds that of the most famous CIWS, the U.S.20mm Vulcan ‘Phalanx’, but remains inferior to the Russian ‘Kashtan’ (Chestnut) twin 30mm CIWS.

Its electronics consists of a small round radar extending from the left top of the turret for tracking and engagement as well as a color camera, heat seeking camera and laser range finder extending from the right top in a U shape mount, where a sensor filled ball rides in the center. The radar’s range is 8 kilometers for small targets and 15 to 20 kilometers for moderate to large targets. The Electro -Optical unit can track out to 6 kilometers. Once identified, the target is allowed to close to 3 kilometers, whereby the gun engages. 1 to 1.5 kilometers is the most opportune and accurate range, however.

Type+730+2_SD.jpg


A later variant Type 730 CIWS with modified electro-optic director (photo : Sinodefence)

Type730’s counterparts include the U.S 20mm ‘Phalanx’, a 1970s design that uses a 6 barreled, 73 inch long, gun with radar (10 kilometer range) and electro optical sensor (5 kilometer range) firing High Explosive and Armor Piercing shells at 4,500 rpm out to a range of 2 kilometers. Cost of the system is $5.6 million. Total systems weight is seven tons.
Russia’s ‘Kashtan’ mounts twin 6 barreled, 110 inch long, 30mm guns using radar (20 kilometer range), and electro-optical sensing (6 kilometer range),and fires High Explosive or Armor piercing projectiles out to a distance of 4 kilometers with a combined rate of fire of 10,000 rpm. Cost of the system is $7 million with a weight of 16 tons.

http://defense-studies.blogspot.com/2009/10/type-730-chinas-ciws.html




Meroka CIWS
762px-Meroka_Pr%C3%ADncipe_de_Asturias.JPG


Goalkeeper CIWS
Goalkeeper.jpg



RIM-116 Rolling Airframe Missile
300px-RIM-116_Rolling_Airframe_Missile_Launcher_3.jpg


Kashtan CIWS
JJB0S.jpg


AK-630
800px-AK-630_30_mm_naval_CIWS_gun.JPEG


5"/54 caliber Mark 45 gun
800px-US_Navy_070111-N-4515N-509_Guided_missile_destroyer_USS_Forest_Sherman_%28DDG_98%29_test_fires_its_five-inch_gun_on_the_bow_of_the_ship_during_training.jpg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5"/54_caliber_Mark_45_gun
 
----------
Extended Range Guided Munition
Extended Range Guided Munition - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ergm_medium.gif

Specification

Caliber: 127 mm (5 in)
Length: 1.55 m (5 ft 1 in)
Weight: 50 kg (110 lb)
Speed: >3000 km/h (1860 mph)
Range: 110 km (60 nm)
Guidance: GPS/INS
Accuracy: < 20 m CEP independent of range.
Propulsion: Solid-propellant rocket motor.
Warhead: 72 DPICM submunitions (EX 1) or unitary high-explosive.

-------------

dlvqi.png


-----------
Otobreda 127/64

Specifications
Barrel length 320 inches (810 cm)[1]
Shell 127 millimetres (5.0 in)
Shell weight 29 kilograms (64 lb) to 31 kilograms (68 lb)[1]
Caliber 127mm
Rate of fire 35 rpm[1]
Muzzle velocity 808 metres per second (2,650 ft/s)[1]
Effective range 30,000 metres (33,000 yd)
Maximum range 120 kilometres (75 mi)

http://defense-update.com/20110928_...n-long-range-naval-projectile-technology.html
 
uCQZy.jpg


dCMWl.jpg

China's new Type 1030 CIWS (Close-In Weapon System)

Znfpu.jpg

A closer look at the barrels of China's Type 1030 CIWS

k2F35.jpg

China's old Type 730 CIWS

Seems like they've increased the number of barrels and possibly caliber as well. It probably means that they are looking to emphasize its rate of fire and service life of the barrels.

[Note: Thank you to Marchpole for the first and third pictures. Thank you to Chengdusudise for the second picture. Thank you to SinoSoldier for the analysis.]
1ODXS.jpg

China's Type 1030 CIWS fires over 10,000 rounds/min.

[Note: Thank you to Marchpole for the post.]
 
I create this new thread because I just start some information researches on the new H/PJ-14 CIWS installed on CV-16 Liaoning.

I heard that this is a CIWS with > 10 000rd/mn, I would like to know if someone has any information about it's specifications, which is the naval research institut responsible for it's development, how many systems are ordered so far, will the new destroyer like Type 052D and Type 055 be equiped...???

Any information, with official source in priority, will be highly appreciated. Thank you.

ZdgYg.jpg


TyHWH.jpg


42G8v.jpg


bQ0k0.jpg


WiEoJ.jpg


kWcIZ.jpg


JYTeh.jpg


:coffee:
@hk299792458

----------
Raytheon Co., Tucson, Ariz. is being awarded a $369,059,572 firm-fixed-price modification under previously awarded contract (N00024-04-C-5460) for Phalanx Close-In Weapons Systems and associated spares for FY06 Navy (51 percent), Army (35 percent), and the Governments of Pakistan (12.8 percent) and Australia (1.2 percent) under the foreign military sales requirements. Phalanx close-in Weapon System (CIWS) is a fast reaction terminal defense against low and high flying, high-speed maneuvering anti-ship missile threats that have penetrated all other ships&#8217; defenses. The CIWS is an integral element of the Fleet Defense In-Depth concept and the Ship Self-Defense Program

http://www.defense.gov/contracts/contract.aspx?contractid=3337
 
Last edited by a moderator:



Guys, I've just posted some info to give a platform to start discussions on the topic ... comparing different nations' tech -- penguin is the expert who can answer to your questions

regards
 
US Navy Producing Scaled-Down Rail Gun Naval Weapon

Back in March 2006, BAE Systems received a contract for &#8220;design and production of the 32 MJ Laboratory Launcher for the U.S. Navy.&#8221; Some hint of what they are talking about can be gleaned from the name. The project is an electro-magnetic rail gun that accelerates a projectile to incredibly high speeds without using explosives. The attraction of such systems is no mystery &#8211; they promise to fire their ammunition 10 or more times farther than conventional naval gun shells, while sharply reducing both the required size of each shell and the amount of explosive material carried on board ship. Progress is being made, but there are still major technical challenges to overcome before a working rail gun becomes a serious naval option.

ORD_Railgun_GA_CONOPS_lg.jpg


Rail Guns: Concept & Technology Developments
An electro-magnetic railgun uses electrical energy to accelerate projectiles to extreme velocities. Railguns do not require powders or explosives to fire the round and therefore free magazine space for other mission areas. In addition, electro-magnetic guns provide a highly consistent and uniform explosive charge that gives much greater accuracy.&#8221;

The technology involves sending an electric current along parallel rails up and through an iron rod that connects the poles of a magnet, firing its projectile. If all goes well, the projectile flies at speeds above Mach 7 and hits its target still traveling at about Mach 5; gun ranges of up to 500 km/ 300 miles have been discussed for such a system.

Technically, the biggest challenges are two-fold: The barrel, and the capacitors. Super-high speed for the fired object = super-high friction in the barrel. The armature also has a tendency to create transitioning, which is a fancy way of saying it creates very hot gas when you move it in the barrel at those speeds. The gun has to be able to take that heat and pressure without deforming, blowing up, or acquiring ballistic characteristics that will make the next shot inaccurate.

The other big challenge is capacitors. There are reports that officials will be unable to use BAE&#8217;s delivered gun until late 2008 or early 2009, because the Navy will be late in buying 100 capacitors that are big enough to power 32 MJ of muzzle energy. Their cost, the size of the order, and the limited industrial base for that sort of thing will all create delays. They also create practical limitations on what sorts of ships can mount a rail gun

The DDG-1000 Zumwalt Class destroyers are going to be all-electric ships, using fully integrated power systems that deliver 78 MW to drive propulsion and onboard electronics. That improved generating capacity is one reason they are most frequently envisaged as the ships that might be mounting EM weapons in future. In truth, any platform with sufficient space and power could be configured to mount them, but right now the power requirements and the physical size of capacitors that would be big enough are key limiting issues.

In related news, Jane&#8217;s has also reported that UT-IAT (University of Texas &#8211; Institute of Advanced Technology) has devised a common low-cost projectile concept for both naval surface-fire support and army non line-of-sight (NLOS) engagements using an EM rail gun launcher. The projectile has a flight mass of 15 kg and contains either multiple kinetic-energy flechettes (darts), or a smaller number of sub-penetrators made of tungsten. In its naval guise it has a muzzle energy of 64 MJ (mega-joules); a muzzle velocity of 2,500 m/s; a maximum range in excess of 500 km and an impact velocity of 1,600 m/s.

ORD_Rail_Gun_on_DDG-1000_Concept_lg.jpg


Jan 31/08: Another step forward. Center, The Navy&#8217;s Office of Naval Research (ONR) successfully conducted a record-setting firing of an electromagnetic rail gun at the Naval Surface Warfare Center in Dahlgren, VA, firing at 10.64MJ (megajoules) with a muzzle velocity of 2,520 meters per second. Let&#8217;s see: 3,600 seconds per hour, 0.62 miles per kilometer&#8230; yes, that&#8217;s over 5,600 miles per hour. The speed of sound is about 760 mph at sea level, so it&#8217;s about Mach 7.4.
http://www.defence.pk/forums/pakist...ure-naval-artillery-no-charge-propollent.html
 
one of the chinese missiles looks similar to p15 termit
 

Back
Top Bottom