What's new

Nations promoting terrorism must be isolated, PM Modi says in UK

.
CTtYVfJVEAE42Up.jpg


BREAKING - Fire Breaks out in Liberals A$$ #ModiatWembley
 
.
As they say about the vulgar masses, the more people flock to a group, the more foolish they become. No matter how prominent an individual is, no, it’s because he is prominent that he would be blotted out by the sheer force of numbers when thrown into that lump of people. Individual will, qualifications, and personality, let alone emotions aren’t considered at all. We see only what we want to see, listen only to what we want to listen to, but for the things we want to say, we aren’t able to. This is the society that we’re living in right now.
 
.
.

the sanghis have created this website ( UK WELCOMES MODI - INDEX ) and a special city bus with that title as if entire britain is so very welcoming of modi... this is similar to their campaign "new york welcomes modi" last year.

what liars !! :lol:
 
. . . .
lol at Pak net warriors most must be under 18...whole world has directly or indirectly acknowledged Pak is a terrorist state..I dont know, why ppl out here are posting something against India and their fellow ppl are clicking on like button..lol...number of likes wont change the reality.... no country in this world will entertain pak's argument that India is a terrorist state...its a big big lol.....may be we are doing something but that is not of the grade of pure terrorism the way Pak has been doing.
 
.

Personal comments and opinion writers don't reflect on the Indian PM's credibility. 9 Billion in business does.

How the UK PM looks at India and this PM = credibility. We know what he thinks of Pakistan. Wonder what commentators and opinion journalists write about Pakistan and Pakistanis within Guardian articles. :lol:
 
Last edited:
.
Isolating Pakistan does not mean halting relationship with Pakistan. India itself maintains relations with Pakistan through the presence of its High commission. What India wants is rejection by the world of Pakistan's use of terrorists as state policy and use their influence in prevailing upon Pakistan to give up that policy.
Not really. Isolation would mean halting of economic and military ties, both of which are increasing. Iran was isolated, DPRK is currently isolated. Pakistan? It's neither isolated, nor will it ever be. Pakistan is far too important to isolate.

Right from the host mouth but some years before
Cameron sparks diplomatic row with Pakistan after 'export of terror' remarks | Politics | The Guardian

David Cameron defends comments about Pakistan and terrorism | Politics | The Guardian

At least modi is generous in not naming you guys directly but the evil British has done so :D:D
First of all, you posted an article from 2010, so well done there. Second...

"British prime minister says he has not caused offence in Pakistan and insists he is not accusing the Islamabad government of promoting terrorism"

How about reading the shit that you post? It's right there in the beginning.

You think we offered the F16 because we are on your good side? :lol:
Why offer them at all, if not to get on Pakistan's good side? No one from Pakistan asked for it, and the US has recently been asking Pakistan for cooperation in dealing with regional problems, namely ISIS and TAPI (which the US is pushing for).

If the US was on Pakistan's bad side, the US would never have even mentioned it. Whether you call it a bribe or a peace token, it doesn't really matter, as the offer itself shows what the US is thinking.
 
.
A terrorist asking for punishment of terrorists :o:o_O :angel::rofl:!!!! Did he not get the welcome he deserved??? or did he not hear from the British law makers and the media on brutality that goes on India with his permissions (been the case for a decade or two)!! I agree with his statement though, let's lock him up first and run MANY minority murder cases on him!!



Who is this supposed to be?
Just because Pakistanis call him a terrorist, he doesn't become one. Can you name one international body that calls him a terrorist? Now for the facts, take a look at the pic:
July_7%2C_2005_London_bombings_CCTV.JPG


These were Pakistani/Pakistani origin terrorists who bombed and killed innocent people. A lot of them having connections to Pakistan. People need to critize these Pakistanis before they can call any body else a terrorist. If you want me to continue I can extend the examples in the U.S. Just this year many Pakistanis have been convicted for terrorism.

Just because you call or assume someone, who no other country calls terrorist, as a terroist, doesn't mean what he i saying is untrue. Think about it for a minute ...
 
.
Why offer them at all, if not to get on Pakistan's good side? No one from Pakistan asked for it, and the US has recently been asking Pakistan for cooperation in dealing with regional problems, namely ISIS and TAPI (which the US is pushing for).

If the US was on Pakistan's bad side, the US would never have even mentioned it. Whether you call it a bribe or a peace token, it doesn't really matter, as the offer itself shows what the US is thinking.

The infamous Pakistani conspiracies and delusional theories :rofl:

Whatever do you mean we offered you F16s and you never asked for it. Do you know how stupid that sounds :lol: We are forcing you pay for additional F16s?

Your general has been coming to the U.S with an aid bowl in hand :lol:

U.S and its President once again called you supporters of terrorism, and you think we do that because we like you? :rofl:

U.S. Threatens to Withhold Pakistan Aid - WSJ
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom