NA-122 Report, 93000 unverifiable votes discovered - NADRA

[AdeelFaheem]

Read again:



@SBD-3 @cb4 @Tameem @Fracker @AdeelFaheem @Muhammad Omar etc

Zinda ho ya Sher kha gya app ko??

So, Its not rigging.

 

[SBD-3]

So, Its not rigging.

Oh yeh rigging hay. Becharay Inqilabi andon Ki khushi kharab na karo bhai. Bogus aur unvarified votes ek he tarha Kay hotay hain
@Jazzbot Joe common sense bhee hoti hay magar aqal aur tahreek e Insaaf opposite cheezain ban Gaye hain.

 

[NaMaloom]

Oh yeh rigging hay. Becharay Inqilabi andon Ki khushi kharab na karo bhai. Bogus aur unvarified votes ek he tarha Kay hotay hain
@Jazzbot Joe common sense bhee hoti hay magar aqal aur tahreek e Insaaf opposite cheezain ban Gaye hain.

Nadra only checks votes in a purely technical manner, and it can only say 'verified' or 'unverified'. Nadra does not use the word 'bogus' or 'fake' because that would be akin to passing judgment, which is NOT its mandate. I guess 'commonsense' and 'patwari' are mutually exclusive phenomenon.

 

[ice_man]

ok so unverfied votes WENT TO WHO?? ALL ARE PML N VOTES OR PTI VOTES??

 

[graphican]

Barbar Awan revealing if rigging in NA122 is an "innocent mistake" or "planned rigging".

 

[SBD-3]

Nadra only checks votes in a purely technical manner, and it can only say 'verified' or 'unverified'. Nadra does not use the word 'bogus' or 'fake' because that would be akin to passing judgment, which is NOT its mandate. I guess 'commonsense' and 'patwari' are mutually exclusive phenomenon.

Probably using the definition of Imran's definition
What is a bogus vote
1-A vote which can not be matched with the underlying CNIC.
2-The CNIC used is a fake one
3-The thumb imprint used is matched to some other CNIC.
What is an unvarifable vote?
A vote whose thumb impression is not varifiable yet the record of CNIC and its existence in the halqa are correct.
But like they say inqlab andh,behra hota hay but here inqilab is also loola and langra in addition.

Barbar Awan revealing if rigging in NA122 is an "innocent mistake" or "planned rigging".

Kabhi Babar awan,kabhi Moeed Pirzada,Kabhi Mubashir Luqman. Inqilabi bohat jaldi yateem ho jatay hain.

 

[graphican]

Probably using the definition of Imran's definition
What is a bogus vote
1-A vote which can not be matched with the underlying CNIC.
2-The CNIC used is a fake one
3-The thumb imprint used is matched to some other CNIC.
What is an unvarifable vote?
A vote whose thumb impression is not varifiable yet the record of CNIC and its existence in the halqa are correct.
But like they say inqlab andh,behra hota hay but here inqilab is also loola and langra in addition.
Kabhi Babar awan,kabhi Moeed Pirzada,Kabhi Mubashir Luqman. Inqilabi bohat jaldi yateem ho jatay hain.

Haha, love your expression of frustration.

On side note, I am not Inqlabi, I believe in gradual but a continuous change. Only such change can last long enough to have impact on the country.

 

[SBD-3]

Haha, love your expression of frustration.

On side note, I am not Inqlabi, I believe in gradual but a continuous change. Only such change can last long enough to have impact on the country.

Two opposing things. Firstly trying to be an IA and at the same time claiming not to be an IA. A paradox.

 

[graphican]

Two opposing things. Firstly trying to be an IA and at the same time claiming not to be an IA. A paradox.

I told you in writing and clearly what I believe. What is IA?

 

[SBD-3]

I told you in writing and clearly what I believe. What is IA?

Your hands are not with your heart.

 

[graphican]

Your hands are not with your heart.

What is IA mate? I think I am an honest person and will accept where I am wrong. Just show me if I am somewhere.

 

[SBD-3]

What is IA mate? I think I am an honest person and will accept where I am wrong. Just show me if I am somewhere.

Everybody believes one to be self-righteous, honest and blah blah blah. Anyways.

 

[graphican]

Everybody believes one to be self-righteous, honest and blah blah blah. Anyways.

Show me where you found me wrong. I am never reluctant to accept my mistakes and correct myself.

With a little idea on the background, I found you are annoyed by my news posting where I mention opinions of various analysts and media person but all talk about failure of transparent elections. I don't follow none of the journalists nor I am intellectually owened by one party - but out of all the options, I believe IK (instead of IA) has shown character, determination and sincerity with the country. I support his honestly, determination and sincerity and believe he deserves a chance to lead the country, representing as many people who think he should lead.

 

[SBD-3]

Show me where you found me wrong. I am never reluctant to accept my mistakes and correct myself.

With a little idea on the background, I found you are annoyed by my news posting where I mention opinions of various analysts and media person but all talk about failure of transparent elections. I don't follow none of the journalists nor I am intellectually owened by one party - but out of all the options, I believe IK (instead of IA) has shown character, determination and sincerity with the country. I support his honestly, determination and sincerity and believe he deserves a chance to lead the country, representing as many people who think he should lead.

I am not annoyed. I am just making a question that a person who is known to be of little credibility. And secondly,its an opinion,not a news. The person who was kicked out by his own party for dishonesty,a person who took a u-turn on his words when he was abandoned by his leadership. However, since he serves one's ego, he's all good...anyways. IK (separate from IA) showed more faith in the umpire than his supporters and his ideology.And result is we all know.

 

[graphican]

I am not annoyed. I am just making a question that a person who is known to be of little credibility. And secondly,its an opinion,not a news. The person who was kicked out by his own party for dishonesty,a person who took a u-turn on his words when he was abandoned by his leadership. However, since he serves one's ego, he's all good...anyways.

Okay, keep your opinion and use your best judgement to choose the right person for Pakistan. There is no disagreement in the country that Pakistan deserves non-corrupt, honest and capable leader. You choose the one you think is the right and Pakistanis have their right to choose whoever they think is right. Lets just take electoral corruption out of the equation. Do you think elections should be transparent and corruption free? If you do, you are on the same page as I am.

Let Nawaz Shareef and Shahbaaz Shareef become PM and CM through just and transparent elections. If this makes you happy, this is what makes me happy as well.