What's new

Muslims should be communal for their own good', Shazia Ilmi says

. . . .
Other communities voted for her without looking at religion and now she does it. Why do they always have to stab us?
 
.
wait until that majority becomes minority...you will see so called "secular" india.

Having more than 2 kids based on the per capita income one gets will help India in future by providing more youth to nation building.
 
.
Every one ask for minority protection or safety or quota or other things, but who gonna take care of poor majority in here.??? I need a govt to treat equal for all with one law one nation. I gonna vote for BJP always. This is going to be a game changing election in 21st century India. Your one vote can make a strong and stable govt
 
.
Tumhare andar ka "Chatur" jaag gaya?? :coffee:

mere ko gussa aa jata hai is nautanki ki shakal dekh ke hi :mad::mad::mad:

Having more than 2 kids based on the per capita income one gets will help India in future by providing more youth to nation building.

Having kids more than you can even feed or provide proper shelter or education is a burden on our nation. :coffee:
 
.
EVERYONE who votes is communal - that is the whole idea behind democracy.

People vote for a candidate who will address their concerns, whether it be women's rights or farmers' concerns or small business issues or anything else.
 
.
mere ko gussa aa jata hai is nautanki ki shakal dekh ke hi :mad::mad::mad:
People showing tolerance towards minorities is a right way to go forward in a country like India. This do not come under minority appeasement nor it is against Indian constitution.

It is because of some people who repeatedly used the word secularism and dragged and made that term as a Taboo there by indirectly helping the rightists.

Showing animosity or alienating minorities is the wrong thing to do when internal stability is the main agenda for National security.
Having kids more than you can even feed or provide proper shelter or education is a burden on our nation. :coffee:

I said based on percapita income.
 
.
People showing tolerance towards minorities is a right way to go forward in a country like India

Wrong. . . it should be a mutual thing. . . if the leverage is given to the minorities only then its clearly minority appeasement. and it is very much against the core idea of our constitution . .

It is because of some people who repeatedly used the word secularism and dragged and made that term as a Taboo there by indirectly helping the rightists.

the self proclaimed seculars are the biggest exploiters. nuff said.

I said based on percapita income.

you ar talking about future and i'm talking about things happening in present.
 
. .
Wrong. . . it should be a mutual thing. . . if the leverage is given to the minorities only then its clearly minority appeasement. and it is very much against the core idea of our constitution . .

What ever I said is according to the Indian constitution. What is wrong if Muslims as a minority vote for a certain candidate who ensures their concerns are heard??

This is a right of the individual and appealing to vote is also a right given by the constitution.

the self proclaimed seculars are the biggest exploiters. nuff said.
secularism do not mean appeasing minorities. Nor implementing schemes on favor of minorities.

you ar talking about future and i'm talking about things happening in present.
I am not talking about future what I said is applicable to present also.
 
.
What ever I said is according to the Indian constitution. What is wrong if Muslims as a minority vote for a certain candidate who ensures their concerns are heard??
This is a right of the individual and appealing to vote is also a right given by the constitution.

Then why this bigotry when similar things are practiced by BJP guys ? why they are labeled as communal ??

secularism do not mean appeasing minorities. Nor implementing schemes on favor of minorities

Same as above !!

I am not talking about future what I said is applicable to present also.

How is it applicable ? please elaborate . . .???
 
.
It was a secular comment from a champion of secularism so no fuss!!
 
.
Back
Top Bottom