What's new

Mumbo-jumbo Islamic feminism & Talibanisation of Pak women

Status
Not open for further replies.

ajtr

BANNED
Joined
May 25, 2010
Messages
9,357
Reaction score
0
Mumbo-jumbo Islamic feminism & Talibanisation of Pak women

exclusive%20inside.jpg


It is not surprising then to find some 'modern' Pakistani Muslims coining contradictory catchwords like 'Muslim Feminists' or 'liberal Hijabi' to explain or perhaps justify their preferred social and religious behaviours

One cannot help but wonder how come people establish their social identities on the basis of a trail of oxymorons. But Pakistan is a country where rhetoric pulls more crowds than reason - which has no fan-base in the land of the pure. It is not surprising then to find some 'modern' Pakistani Muslims coining contradictory catchwords like 'Muslim Feminists' or 'liberal Hijabi' to explain or perhaps justify their preferred social and religious behaviours.

The predetermined role of women within the parameters of Islamic doctrines (or any other faith of the world) and the objectives of modern feminism are, to say the least, quite inconsistent with each other. Yet 'modern' Islamic scholars in Pakistan rave a lot about the 'freedom and respect' Islam has bestowed upon women in comparison with other religions, which are completely misogynist and oppressive. But these scholars – bent on elevating divine decrees into scientific theories - fail to justify the encouragement of polygamy for Muslim men or the prohibition of marrying a non-believer for women. Neither can they explain those Quranic verses portraying women as ‘docile’ companions who should be reprimanded or punished physically by their ‘guardians’ i.e. men, if they display ‘disobedience’(Nisa:34).

This ideological mumbo-jumbo of Muslim feminism - a product of Pakistan's 'educated urban' minds, addicted to drawing relentless parallels between western knowledge and Quranic revelations - may not be very convincing for the 'real feminists' or cultural theorists, but the notion is catching on with the radical Islamists, since it allows them to popularise a gender-friendly religiosity that has a far-reaching political and social impact.

So-called 'Islamic feminism' in Pakistan can only be deciphered as a current of feminised fundamentalism flowing through the patriarchal politicisation of religion. Personal choices and philosophies of Muslim 'feministsoras', as most of them like to call themselves - the ‘liberated Muslim women’ of Pakistan - are borrowed heavily from the dogmatic interpretations of (semi-literate) ulemas, state-sponsored scholars and demagogic televangelists, who all happen to be males. These empowered women regularly demand their ‘right to wear the hijab’ during demonstrations, while chanting slogans such as 'an attack on hijab is an attack on Islam’. Basically manipulating the sexual exploitation of western women, this wave of women's emancipation and liberation stresses reviving Islamic values in the country. In addition, the rhetoric fed to the ‘empowered’ women lays special emphasis on Sharia enforcement, the long cherished ideal of orthodox Islamists. In short, the equation of women's liberation with the fundamentals of Islam is heading towards the Talibanisation of Pakistani women.

On November 21 Qazi Hussain Ahmed, former head of right wing political party Jamat-e-Islami, escaped a suicide attack in Mohmand Agency, in the tribal belt of Pakistan. The attack on the pro-Taliban religious leader was allegedly carried out by a burqa-clad female suicide bomber who attempted to assassinate Qazi - himself a die-hard supporter of the hijab and the exclusion of women.

Whether the assault was an American or Zionist conspiracy is a question better left to the inquisitive Jammatiyas [members of Jamaat]. However, the induction of a female bomber to hit a high-profile target points to the equal opportunity makeover of Pakistan’s ****** networks, and therefore should not be underestimated by the government or by civil society. The phenomenon of female suicide bombers is closely connected with the emergence of radical female seminaries like Jamia Hafsa and Al Huda Foundation, which are engaged in the indoctrination of women. The moral police of Jamia Hafsa, which kidnapped a woman in 2007 on ‘charges of promoting obscenity’ while vandalizing private property and torturing many residents of Islamabad, is a sharp reminder of how female empowerment is actually perceived by the rightwing Islamists in Pakistan.

Owing to the mind-blowing rightist propaganda about anti-Islam global conspiracies, more and more women are falling into the trap of proving their worth by wearing their Islamic identity on their sleeves.

According to a research conducted by Pathways of Women’s Empowerment South Asia Hub, the number of Pakistani women attending religious classes (i.e. Dars) to authenticate their beliefs is increasing.

Another survey reveals that Pakistani women tend to blindly follow their religion and don’t bother to question their faith. This has made the job of those selling emancipation, feminism or political Islam to Pakistani women very easy. The seeds of moral subjugation are planted with the assistance of the country’s utterly chauvinist and conservative broadcast media. Religious symbols extensively used by TV channels dictate moral subservience and nurture religious fervour but discourage rational thinking. From cooking shows to prime-time entertainment, the mind of Pakistani women is captured with the blitz of references taken from Quran, Hadith, Sunnah, and punctuated with alhamdulilahs , mashallahs, allah hafizs. Those Muslim women who feel more protected by a male-dominant Islamic system than the independent western woman who is sexually abused are themselves intellectually abused and brainwashed - which allows them then to be deployed as the ideological foot-soldiers of religious extremists. These slaves of faith, eulogising the power religion gives to them, need to alternatively delve into the abuse of this power as well.
 
. . .
Just read the whole thing, the first par: full retard, middle part was kinda good, last part: please never go full retard again
 
.
Once a cradle of great civilization Pakistan today finds itself in the grip of savage Taliban terrorist. Bring secular vision of Jinnah for Pakistan. When critical thinking is silenced in the name of savage blasphemy rules, societies tend to destruct.
 
.
Interesting Article. Regulated religion is the only answer to most of the issues we face today. To be realistic though, neither political party has guts to do that.
 
.
Faith is something not questioned. But faith is something that everyone must know and not go by the word of mouth.

The catch words of Muslim feminism and liberal hijabi are just reincarnation of same old habits which we the human race need to re-brand in order to continue in our won ways.

I think the blogger will soon be in a 'global thinker' list of Foreign Policy magazine.
 
.
Interesting Article. Regulated religion is the only answer to most of the issues we face today. To be realistic though, neither political party has guts to do that.

You cannot regulate religion any more than you can regulate what people eat for breakfast. Its a personal choice, but should be kept private mostly.
 
. .
Neither can they explain those Quranic verses portraying women as ‘docile’ companions who should be reprimanded or punished physically by their ‘guardians’ i.e. men, if they display ‘disobedience’(Nisa:34)

This is, called cherry picking one or two lines which suits one's own mindset ignoring the fact that the chapter this verse was taken from is perhaps the most detailed study of women rights in any holy scripture of any faith.

Parallels can be made, with the so called "72 Virgins [Huris]" often used by Pakistans "unique" liberals, which is nothing but plain BS, because nor the number 72 exists in anywhere in the Quran nor do so called "Virgins" translate into "huris", by any means, but it will be used until it serves their agenda.I, really enjoy the "half educated" armchair writers, accusing others of being "half educated".

In short, the equation of women's liberation with the fundamentals of Islam is heading towards the Talibanisation of Pakistani women.

This line is one hell of a claim, for which the author offers "no proof" at all. Again, selective reading and selected beliefs about a wide topic with zero proofs and zero solutions which makes it nothing but a 200 worded rant.

As, for the Women suicide bombers, well they are not unique to Pakistan but to many other countries. In fact they were used in Sri Lanka before anywhere else. So, does that mean that Talibanization reached women in sri lanka before it reached in Pakistan?

Genius case study indeed!

religion needs to go out of Pakistan, Afghanistan and Iran.

And, how exactly do you propose it?
 
.
Faith is something not questioned. But faith is something that everyone must know and not go by the word of mouth.

The catch words of Muslim feminism and liberal hijabi are just reincarnation of same old habits which we the human race need to re-brand in order to continue in our won ways.

I think the blogger will soon be in a 'global thinker' list of Foreign Policy magazine.
I do question quran or any other religious text i ve read till my doubts are cleared. i dont take religious texts on face value.
People dont question the faith hence they get easily misguided by mullah types.
 
.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH

have you seen pakistan women not even wearing dupatta now a days??

i mean they dont complain how some pak women have resorted to wear a sleeveless kameez and with no dupatta, but they complain about the burka

pakistani society has become polarised to the extremities, and each extremities are moving towards extreme following either it be islamic or western

the islamists are following wahabis from arab, the extreme western are following the west

this is a reality, see the other side of the coin too
 
.
This is, called cherry picking one or two lines which suits one's own mindset ignoring the fact that the chapter this verse was taken from is perhaps the most detailed study of women rights in any holy scripture of any faith.

Parallels can be made, with the so called "72 Virgins [Huris]" often used by Pakistans "unique" liberals, which is nothing but plain BS, because nor the number 72 exists in anywhere in the Quran nor do so called "Virgins" translate into "huris", by any means, but it will be used until it serves their agenda.I, really enjoy the "half educated" armchair writers, accusing others of being "half educated".



This line is one hell of a claim, for which the author offers "no proof" at all. Again, selective reading and selected beliefs about a wide topic with zero proofs and zero solutions which makes it nothing but a 200 worded rant.

As, for the Women suicide bombers, well they are not unique to Pakistan but to many other countries. In fact they were used in Sri Lanka before anywhere else. So, does that mean that Talibanization reached women in sri lanka before it reached in Pakistan?

Genius case study indeed!



And, how exactly do you propose it?
I too have done lot of cherry picking on Sura-al-nisa....Raja pakistani is the greatest casuality of that..............:woot:
 
.
I too have done lot of cherry picking on Sura-al-nisa....Raja pakistani is the greatest casuality of that..............:woot:

Reading Qura'n is easy, understanding is not.So, many interpretations exist for a reason. The writer has zero arguments, zero proofs, no case study, no conclusion, no solutions just plain rhetoric based on her own ignorance. Usually what your normal nerdy bloggers look like.
 
.
[:::~Spartacus~:::];3655309 said:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH

have you seen pakistan women not even wearing dupatta now a days??

i mean they dont complain how some pak women have resorted to wear a sleeveless kameez and with no dupatta, but they complain about the burka

pakistani society has become polarised to the extremities, and each extremities are moving towards extreme following either it be islamic or western

the islamists are following wahabis from arab, the extreme western are following the west

this is a reality, see the other side of the coin too


Good point. Ever talk about the sleeve-less or dupatta-less types and you will be instantly branded an extremist, a Taliban or any choice words selected for those in today's lingo who go against the west's point of view of freedom and liberty.

We have enough 'global thinkers' in our enlgish speaking classes who will do it before the west would even know of it.

Reading Qura'n is easy, understanding is not.So, many interpretations exist for a reason. The writer has zero arguments, zero proofs, no case study, no conclusion, no solutions just plain rhetoric based on her own ignorance. Usually what your normal nerdy bloggers look like.

But we all must make an effort. Understading Quran is sometimes difficult because Quran talks about things which we have not or might not see in our life times.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom