I am not denying any of it. But apparently u can't phantom the fact that the butcher is just that a murderous butcher. So please stop eating my time. And shuuu
This is utter stupidity by the TOI (surprise surprise).
An illogical statement that is not representative of the facts.
MI5 have some good contacts in Turkey too because they have been heavily engaged in trying to prevent scores of British teenagers from fleeing to ISIS via Turkey.
That's actually really funny
This is utter stupidity by the TOI (surprise surprise).
RAW, IB, MI5 and Mossad are ALL intelligence agencies- they do NOT provide proximity/physical protection to anyone- let alone the Indian PM.
The truth to this news is going to be that the Indian intelligence agencies and the aforementioned intel agencies (along with the Turkish and US agencies I am sure) are more intensively sharing intel as Modi visits Ankara in light of recent events.
I am sure that the physical security will be stepped up by the SPG and the Turkish law enforcement agencies (as will many other head of states' security details who are in attendance to the G20 summit). The SPG always has a quick reaction force on standby back in Delhi when the PM is out of country for specifically this purpose- supplementing the PM's existing cover in the face of a heightened threat perception.
The TOI's report is over sensationalised as one would expect- these things are following established protocols, there is not much extraordinary here to be honest. The Indian security establishment will undertake whatever they feel necessary to keep the PM safe.
An illogical statement that is not representative of the facts.
MI5 have some good contacts in Turkey too because they have been heavily engaged in trying to prevent scores of British teenagers from fleeing to ISIS via Turkey.
That's actually really funny
IB do what?
IB personnel remain in security detail of PM & Prez.
Intel sharing (which would have been going on anyway)- Mi5 and MI6 have a good amount of coverage in that region/nation thanks to the issues we have faced with ISIS wannabes transiting from our shores to Syria via Turkey.
And how UK is more hostile than Turkey?
No they don't- they used to (to an extent) in the 70s/80s. Now it is 100% the duty of the SPG, there are IB liaisons with the SPG but they are never deployed as part of the security cover for the PM.
And how you concluded this?
To be honest the SPG and PM security are areas of interest to me so i have done quite a bit of research into it. Anyway, the SPG act says it all- the SPG are the sole agency responsible for PM (their families and former PMs) security. Other agencies (like the IB and R&AW) provide intel inputs to them but the SPG are the ones who are ultimately responsible for the PM's security 24/7 wherever he/she may be- no matter what.
Yup, but there are "CLEAR" & "RECORDED" proofs that this act was broken in last decade. Did anyone filed the case against GoI during those days? Did anyone filed against Gandhi family?
I don't understand the question my friend...
SO HE IS your PApA?
My question is if SPG can provide security to Gandhi Family, then why not to prez?
