What's new

Modi's Policy Blunders & India's Superpower Delusions

India threw away its substantial conventional military edge over Pakistan when the Hindu Nationalist government of Atal Bihari Vajapayee decided to carry out its nuclear tests in 1998. It gave Pakistan the justification it needed to go nuclear a few weeks later, thereby achieving balance of terror with its much larger neighbor with a huge conventional military.

Source: Modi's Policy Blunders & India's Superpower Delusions
Bullshit of the highest order! Pakistan had become nuclear much before India did. Only they didn't publicize it. Otherwise how could they have designed and exploded a nuke within a few days after India exploded the bombs? They had kept it hidden all along.

Haq with his muck again! His nonsense is getting to be tiring.

He needs to go get a life.
 
Last edited:
.
WELL SIR.... like an ex indian general said "you can't fight USA without the bomb".... going nuclear isnt about pakistan... we have hostile China.. more importantly USA was hostile in those decades too....

Forget about U.S.

China is just an excuse. The fact is that India's entire military and its armaments are designed to fight in the plains of Punjab and deserts of Rajasthan, not on the mountains between India and China.

Haq's Musings: India's Hostility Toward Pakistan
 
.
Haq's Musings: India's Superpower Delusions: Modi's Flawed Policies

"If you (India) want to run with the big dogs, you have to stop pissing with the puppies".
Robert Blackwill, Ex US Ambassador to India

Prime Minister Narendra Modi with Top Foreign Policy Advisor Ajit Doval

What Mr. Blackwill said about India back in 2006 still rings true with Modi's foreign policy team's poor handling of Nepal. In a piece titled "Has Narendra Modi's foreign policy bubble burst", a BBC report summed up the situation in the following words:

"For many in India, Narendra Modi is seen as the country's best brand ambassador. That's quite apparent from his many overseas visits in his first 16 months in office - he has generated plenty of interest, airtime and drawn adulation from the extensive Indian diaspora. But that may not be enough in sustaining relationships in the neighbourhood, as he is fast finding out."

India's Regional Ties:

There seems to be emerging consensus that Prime Modi's "Neighborhood First" policy he announced at the time of his inauguration last year appears to be on the verge of collapse.

The Hindu Nationalists' foreign policy spearheaded by former RAW Chief Ajit Doval is causing rapid deterioration of India's relations with most of its neighbors ranging in size from China and Pakistan to Maldives and Nepal. Written during Prime Minister Modi's recent US visit, including a large reception given by Indian Americans in Silicon Valley, an opinion piece by policy analyst Jyoti Malhotra concludes as follows: "So as the prime minister charms America, flanked by his two key aides Ajit Doval and S Jaishankar, the thought surfaces: Let him also spare a thought for India’s crisis-ridden neighbourhood".

India's Biggest Policy Blunder:

India threw away its substantial conventional military edge over Pakistan when the Hindu Nationalist government of Atal Bihari Vajapayee decided to carry out its nuclear tests in 1998. It gave Pakistan the justification it needed to go nuclear a few weeks later, thereby achieving balance of terror with its much larger neighbor with a huge conventional military.

Indian analyst Krishna Kant explains his country's policymakers blunder as follows: "Nuclear weapons have reduced Pakistan defense cost while we (India) have been forced to spend tens of billions of dollars to acquire latest military hardware in a bid to retain the edge. Its shows in the defence budget of the two countries since 1999 nuclear blasts. All through 1980s and 90s, Pakistan was spending around a third of its government budget and 5-6% of its GDP on defence, or about twice the corresponding ratios for India. After going nuclear, Pakistan’s defence spending decelerated and its share in GDP is expected to be decline to around 2.5% in the current fiscal year, slightly ahead of India’s 2%. This is releasing resources for Pakistan to invest in productive sectors such as infrastructure and social services, something they couldn’t do when they were competing with India to maintain parity in conventional weapons."

Ajit Doval's Rhetoric Against Pakistan:

Kant argues that the Hindu Nationalists blunders in the past have severely limited Indias's policy options vis-a-vis Pakistan. Here's how how he concluded his Op Ed in Business Standard: "In this environment, a hard talk by Mr Doval followed by a high-decibel drama by the government on the National Security Advisor’s talk between the two countries seems nothing more than a show for the gallery. The audience may be applauding right now, but claps may turn to boos as the public realises the inconsistencies in the script and the pain it inflicts on the hero."

Summary:

Hindu Nationalists' superpower delusions have led them to policies that are hurting India's position in South Asia region and the world. No amount of hard talk by Ajit Doval can change this fact. Former Indian Prime Minister Mr. Manmohan Singh has recently said: "India and Pakistan need sustained engagement to realise the vast potential of benefits of liberalisation of trade and investment in the South Asian region." Modi and Doval need listen to Mr. Singh. India's best bet is to engage with Pakistan as well as other neighbors on a sustained basis to deal with the realities as they exist.

Related Link:

Haq's Musings

Modi's Pakistan Policy

Modi in Silicon Valley

Rise of the Sangh Parivar

India's Israel Envy: What If Modi Attacks Pakistan

Jaswant Singh on India's Foreign Policy's "Strategic Confinement"

Ex RAW Agent Document's India's Successes in Pakistan


Haq's Musings: India's Superpower Delusions: Modi's Flawed Policies


There are some foreign policy lapses off late , hope they will correct them soon.

Secondly regarding nuclear tests .... these are china specific. The emergence of China made India to go for nuclear tests.

Third India is aiming to expand its influence and to become a global player, one of the reason behind the arms buildup.

India is changing its foreign policy from passive to proactive and is aiming to play a constructive role on the globe, arms build up is not an isolated development it is an integral part of economic and diplomatic buildup.
 
.
The fact is that India's entire military and its armaments are designed to fight in the plains of Punjab and deserts of Rajasthan, not on the mountains between India and China.

How do you say this ?
 
. .
.
India's 4000 tanks are useless for war fighting in the height of the Himalayas that divide India from China.

But these same tanks are quite useful for fighting against Pakistan in the plains of Punjab and the desrts of Rajasthan.

Haq's Musings: India's Israel Envy: What If Modi Attacks Pakistan?

I expected this .

Besides tanks is there any other equipment that you feel is unsuitable ?

Please check how many tanks & ICVs are there in Laddakh & Sikkim . More can follow. The plateau in Tibet is good tank country.

We used them against Pak in 48 at Chushul much to the amazement of the enemy.
 
.
There are dozens of "nuclear threshold" states in the world...many European and East Asian nations can build a bomb on short notice. Pakistan was also a nuclear threshold state in 1998.

But there's a big difference between a "nuclear threshold" state and an actual nuclear-armed state.

Had India not become a declared nuclear state, Pakistan would not have either, nor would it have built a large nuclear arsenal of warheads and missiles that it has since 1998.

Haq's Musings: Gen Kidwai on Pakistan's 2nd Strike Capability and Nuclear Triad

Unlike Pakistan's, our government doesn't function with solely Pakistan at its site.

salaam chachha ... aur sunao kaise mizaaj hain apke sirji :azn:

His urinary bladder is leaking again..:(
 
. . .
I seriously think that it is not a joke, haven't you seen how he is always pissing over all Indian achievements? What else explains this behaviour?
im more confused now ....anyway chachha is always angry with india and tries to play with facts and figures no matter how clumsy the result may be :sarcastic:
 
.
.
Does this imply that had Pokhran II not taken place Pak would not have had the nuclear capability ? No.

The author here assumes that "Indian Nukes" are Pakistan centric.....That itself is a mistake........ Pakistan already had the nukes or were close to making one, the only thing the test did was to come out of the shadow for both nations....
 
.
Aren't you talking of nukes, then why bring conventional weapons here? India's nukes are against China and not Pakistan.

I'm talking about intentions. India's intention have always been to intimidate Pakistan.
India's invasion of East Pakistan and breakup of Pakistan made India's intentions toward Pakistan very clear.

And the result is a nuclear-armed Pakistan which severely limits India's policy options.

Haq's Musings: Israel and Pakistan Bolster Second Strike Capability With AIP Subs
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom