What's new

Modi's bravado ups the ante in India-Pakistan fighting

Our history with our neighbors is far worse and far older than the India-Pakistan dispute (which is relatively recent).

Yet we do not shoot each other constantly on the border, or use artillery and mortar shells on civilian villages.

The water cannons and tents we use in our territorial disputes are non-lethal, nobody dies. No children have to go without their parents, or parents without their children.

And needless to say, when using mortar/artillery, and killing soldiers/civilians on the other side, the chances of an accidental war occurring are much higher.

Would you still use non-lethal weps when enemy is using lethal weps? india-pak border issue cannot be compared to any of Chinese border issues with her neighbors. The hostility is far greather.
 
. .
You guys shoot anything that moves on your borders with Pakistan or Bangladesh.

Civilians, soldiers (some also have their heads cut off), cattle traders, children, immigrants, etc. Hell just a few days ago you killed 20 civilians in Pakistan by shelling civilian villages.

When we have disputes in the South China Sea, we use water cannons. Nobody actually dies, there is no bloodshed.

We certainly don't shell civilian villages in other countries? Or cut off the heads of foreign soldiers and mutilate their bodies, as happens on the India-Pakistan border?



We use water cannons in our territorial disputes, or tents.

You guys use artillery shells on innocent civilian villages along the LOC with Pakistan, you just killed 20 civilians in the past few days.

If you consider that to be more peaceful than water cannons, then yes let your Christian/Abrahamic God help you.

And let another Nehru rise again.
simple question. .. does your neighbours exporting terrorism. .. do they have terrorist camps in their soil...
 
.
The logical thing.

Use all our informants and all our information sources to decide whether or not India will launch a nuclear strike against China during this hypothetical India-Pakistan War, or keep it between India and Pakistan.

If the Chinese leadership believes that India will use nuclear weapons against us (for whatever reason) during an India-Pakistan nuclear war, we will of course have no other option but to strike first using our own nuclear arsenal, to try and disable as many Indian nukes as possible before they are fired at us.

That's simply self-preservation.

Since india has no first use policy, china in her power along with international community would make sure that pak does not launch nuclear weps. They would then argue to end the war and maybe threaten sanctions.
 
.
You guys shoot anything that moves on your borders with Pakistan or Bangladesh.

Civilians, soldiers (some also have their heads cut off), cattle traders, children, immigrants, etc. Hell just a few days ago you killed 20 civilians in Pakistan by shelling civilian villages.

When we have disputes in the South China Sea, we use water cannons. Nobody actually dies, there is no bloodshed.

We certainly don't shell civilian villages in other countries? Or cut off the heads of foreign soldiers and mutilate their bodies, as happens on the India-Pakistan border?



We use water cannons in our territorial disputes, or tents.

You guys use artillery shells on innocent civilian villages along the LOC with Pakistan, you just killed 20 civilians in the past few days.

If you consider that to be more peaceful than water cannons, then yes let your Christian/Abrahamic God help you.

And let another Nehru rise again.

I repeat, the latest tension in Indo-Pak border was started by Pakistan, just check who fired at us first, our response is always proportionate, fire with fire, tent with tent.

And even then also we stopped at one point, and a Pakistani member confirmed it by opening a thread.

Indian BSF stopped firing first. So credit goes to them

But they again started it the very next day.

India: Pakistan resumes firing in Kashmir, targets Poonch

So stop defending your rogue protege.
 
.
Use all our informants and all our information sources to decide whether or not India will launch a nuclear strike against China during this hypothetical India-Pakistan War, or keep it between India and Pakistan.
why would india do that ? o_O


If the Chinese leadership believes that India will use nuclear weapons against us (for whatever reason) during an India-Pakistan nuclear war, we will of course have no other option but to strike first using our own nuclear arsenal, to try and disable as many Indian nukes as possible before they are fired at us.
what happened to no first use policy ? :cheesy:


That's simply self-preservation.
that's simply feeding chinese cheerleaders on this forum to affirm them that "we are with you" "we are with you" :coffee:


The logical thing.
:lol:
 
. .
actually Chinese guy is right, India might use nuclear weapons in case Pakistan pushes the nuke button not only on Pakistan/China but Saudi Arabia as well, both of these countries are responsible for using Pakistan as a pawn against India where Chinese are nuke weapon tech. provider and Saudi Arabia is main financier.
nuke mars and moon too LOL

No First Use against non-Nuclear weapons states.
argh! my bad
but we aren't nuclear weapon state because we haven't signed the NPT :whistle:
 
. .
Some people never learn... I don't think this massive retaliation would stop loc firing for ever.. But definitely they will remember this next time... :agree:
 
.
Lame indian effort to show "machoism" after repeated rape by Chinese forces on indo-China border. don't worry will give you an anal with out any lubes LOL hahaha

"The message we have been given from the prime minister's office is very clear and precise," said a senior Indian Home Ministry official. "The prime minister's office has instructed us to ensure that Pakistan suffers deep and heavy losses."Reuters
 
.
We use water cannons in our territorial disputes, or tents.

You guys use artillery shells on innocent civilian villages along the LOC with Pakistan, you just killed 20 civilians in the past few days.

If you consider that to be more peaceful than water cannons, then yes let your Christian/Abrahamic God help you.

And let another Nehru rise again.

What about the causalities on our side? What about innocent villagers on our side? We had our causalities that too include innocent woman and children.. You can afford water cannon and tents in territorial disputes but we have been target of cross border terrorism for the past 2 decades.. Considering what you are doing to your own countrymen to curb terrorism, we both can agree it is a logical thing to do..
 
.
Our history with our neighbors is far worse and far older than the India-Pakistan dispute (which is relatively recent).

Yet we do not shoot each other constantly on the border, or use artillery and mortar shells on civilian villages.

The water cannons and tents we use in our territorial disputes are non-lethal, nobody dies. No children have to go without their parents, or parents without their children.

And needless to say, when using mortar/artillery, and killing soldiers/civilians on the other side, the chances of an accidental war occurring are much higher.

They do not use water cannons either nor their terrorists coming inside with water guns.

And the war affects both, de-escalation should be reciprocal.
 
.
.
Back
Top Bottom