What's new

Modi’s blunders unprecedented in India’s foreign policy history

Joined
Mar 23, 2017
Messages
2,028
Reaction score
-8
Country
United States
Location
India
nationalherald%2F2017-06%2F98581fb5-06aa-4dee-82ec-57f90e389532%2Fmodis-blunders-unprecedented-in-indias-foreign-policy-history-russia-visit-1.jpg

Prime Minister of India Narendra Modi with his Russian counterpart President Vladimir Putin during his recent visit to Russia
Modi’s blunders unprecedented in India’s foreign policy history
His frequent visits to foreign shores have brought the following to India: Rebuke from Trump, Moscow warming up to Pakistan and the Sino-Pakistan axis getting stronger than ever
Y_dx-xxn.jpeg

Ashis Ray
Jun 09th 2017, 01.49 PM

A heads of government summit between India and Russia is almost an annual affair. Eighteen such meetings have taken place without any interruptions. Interestingly though, three exchange visits have taken place in less than a year and a half; the last two in a space of eight months. Russian President Vladimir Putin visited India in October, 2016. So, what made Prime Minister Narendra Modi go running to Russia last week?


Two intriguing praises I have heard about Modi recently are that he is “controversial”, this from an Indian academic at the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), and a “risk-taker”, from an Indian businessman. Are these virtues? Are being controversial and taking risks at India’s expense laudable?


India’s foreign policy since independence has been carefully crafted. It stressed on non-alignment but out of necessity, it became closer to the Soviet Union. Later, it chose non-partisanship between colliding superpowers. It has served India in good stead.


However, Modi tore apart the doctrine to overtly hug a historically hostile United States of America. Friendship with all was Jawaharlal Nehru’s fundamental philosophy. But for nearly 45 years, Washington spurned India’s goodwill on narrow grounds, built a military pact with Pakistan and converted a struggling China into an economic powerhouse.


The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh in the US may have recommended it, APCO may have advocated it, but India was ill-advised to become America’s puppet in Asia in an anti-China configuration. Former PM P.V. Narasimha Rao rightly understood that Beijing was essentially keen on commercial gains and, therefore, minimised the military threat it posed with a pragmatic peace treaty. Manmohan Singh extracted significant cooperation from Beijing, including the Nuclear Suppliers Group waiver. But Modi criticising China in Japan, a very sensitive matter, and India attempting to hem in its neighbour at Washington’s behest were unlikely to be taken lying down.


Indeed, Modi is squarely responsible for China consolidating its already very close ties with Pakistan and hastening the China Pakistan Economic Corridor project. An enhanced Beijing-Islamabad cooperation is wholly inimical to India. Yet, this is precisely what Modi has unforgivably constructed.


What is worse is that the Indo-US embrace annoyed Russia which, even if not as reliable as the erstwhile Soviet Union, has been India’s most trustworthy defence partner.


P. S. Raghavan was until recently the Indian ambassador to Russia. Now retired from the Indian Foreign Service, he is the convenor of the National Security Advisory Board. In a recent article in The Indian Express he wrote Russia “supplies to India sensitive technologies which are not sold to any other country”. He went on to say, “no other country is willing to supply such technologies”. He added, “Our efforts at diversification of defence imports have not made sufficient headway. In 2012-16, Russia supplied 68 % of our arms imports. USA with 14 % was a distant second. Despite our best efforts over a decade, we still cannot get cutting-edge US defence technologies.”


Besides, it has not gone unnoticed that Russia was reluctant to mention cross-border terrorism (read Pakistan) at the BRICS summit last year. Putin also parried a question on Pakistan’s sponsorship of cross border terrorism in Jammu and Kashmir at St Petersburg last week. The strategic partnership between Russia and China has perceptibly strengthened, with Putin treated as a prominent participant in last month’s Belt and Road Forum in Beijing. In short, Russia can no longer be considered by South Block as a bulwark against Chinese ill intentions towards India.


To teach Modi a lesson – with India the consequent sufferer – for his cosiness with the US, Russia has unfrozen its relationship with Pakistan. The two held their first-ever joint military exercise in 2016. The Pakistani Air Force Chief, in an address at the IISS, made no secret of his weakness for the Russian SU-35 combat aircraft to bolster his nation’s fleet. Pakistan’s Defence Minister Khawaja Asif was in Moscow six weeks ago to take this newfound friendship forward.


A Russia-China-Pakistan dialogue on Afghanistan was also held in Moscow in December. India and Russia are today on divergent paths on the issue. While New Delhi is committed to support the government of President Ashraf Ghani, and rightly so, Moscow is keeping its options open by opening communication channels with the Pakistan-backed Taliban.


Over and above, economic cooperation between India and Russia remains stagnant. “Since 2014,” recorded Raghavan, “Mr Modi has repeatedly emphasised that strengthening the economic pillar of the India-Russia strategic partnership needs special focus. Government departments functioning in silos or sometimes at cross-purposes have failed to effectively pursue this objective.”


Russia played the game beautifully against a novice like Modi. It knew fully well that overtures to Pakistan and China will alarm India and it will come scurrying back to restore a status quo ante. This is exactly what has happened with the RSS pracharak landing up in Moscow with goodies such as more defence and nuclear energy contracts.


Snuggling up to the US has exploded on Modi’s face. The Joint Strategic Vision for Asia-Pacific and the Indian Ocean Region agreed with Barack Obama appears to be of little interest to Donald Trump. Indeed, he singled out India for a tirade against the Paris Agreement on Climate Change. “India makes its participation contingent on receiving billions and billions and billions of dollars in foreign aid from developed countries,” he alleged. This is hardly bonhomie between strategic partners.


Thanks to Modi, India is confronted with triple jeopardy. Its tilt towards the US has boomeranged, its hand vis-à-vis Russia has weakened and the China-Pakistan axis has intensified. It’s probably the biggest goof-up in the annals of Indian foreign policy.

https://www.nationalheraldindia.com...in-indias-foreign-policy-history-russia-visit
 
True, we have been completely isolated and surrounded and about to be destroyed :D

I am wondering under Cong 10 year rule we had solved terrorism from Pakistan, China was frandly with us, bestest of friends and Russia was completely giving us all tech transfer even before we asked.

The rebuke from trump was also for China but hey that too on issue of climate talks, but only India is rebuked and our diplomatic relations with US will now stop :D

Wonder if Modi is visiting US soon or not or has US cancelled the trip?
 
I only got issues with BJP's communal politics that may pose threat to national integrity or damage our reputation. I have no complaints with how they handle foreign policy with respect to China or Pak as there is no best way to deal with them. Any choice taken will have some negative repercussions.

You mean BJP should not act against Islamic Jihad or Evangelism?
 
The last para says it all

Thanks to Modi, India is confronted with triple jeopardy. Its tilt towards the US has boomeranged, its hand vis-à-vis Russia has weakened and the China-Pakistan axis has intensified. It’s probably the biggest goof-up in the annals of Indian foreign policy.
 
I don't know which group do you belong to. But your question is of the same nincompoops who got itch against Muslims in general. Hopefully I am wrong. Any body creating mischief or trying to play with national integrity, security or communal harmony has to face action. Anybody means anybody, be it muslim extremism, Hindu extremism, naxalism or anything. No targeting of a whole community for political gains or personal hatred/bias of any region/religion/language/color/caste etc based community.

Islamic Jihad means "muslims in general"? :D

Hindu extremism?! How may terror attacks did Hindus commit inside and outside India in last 10 years?

How many Mosques and Churches did Hindus destroy in Last 10 years?

Do you want to know how many Temples were destroyed by Islamic Jihadis in last 10 years? I can give numbers both inside and outside India. You will not like the facts.

When facts fail, the bigots who hate Hindus fall back on rhetoric.

If he didn't have suggestions on how to better handle our relation , then his opinions/complains means f**k for nothing.

When the whole article is written by a biased prism, what the f**k you want me to explain?

is anyone backing Pakistan claims on Kashmir, Be it Russia, US, UK or even China?
Is anyone backing China claims on Arunachal? Even Russia?
Are countries not lining up to sell their wares to India?
Didn't India & China just join up on Paris Climate talks?

Coming to immediate neighbours, look at where Nepal & SL & Bangladesh were 3 years before. In China pocket. Where are they now? Similar with Bhutan & Burma. Hey, let's not talk about them, right?
Let's bring in Pakistan, which was screwing us even 3 years back to show Modi's diplomacy failed. BUT these same critics won't acknowledge that Pakistan is now hated by India, Afghanistan & even Iran. That's not a diplomatic success, right? :D

You pick up isolated incidents and generalize it and roll all over the world making false claims.

Let me ask you this, UK, Germany, France, Russia and Chia just screwed US & trump.
Does it mean US is getting Isolated?

When one talks about diplomacy and international relationships, look at it from the top and not from the street looking at a single issue.
 
This 10th pass PM of India works on intuition, no principled stand. The fellow does not know the ABC of International relations matrix involving the sovereign states.

Needs a crash course.
 
If he didn't have suggestions on how to better handle our relation , then his opinions/complains means f**k for nothing.

If Modi has to rely on the suggestions of the journalists then he does not deserve to be the PM.

He has the entire bureaucracy at his disposal and there were many suggestions given to both MMS & Modi but they failed to execute.

UPA2 and incumbent BJP governments have been disastrous with regards to Indian foreign policy.
 
Where did I say that Islamic Jihad means muslims in general. I have talked to some bhakta and Sanghis who has got plain objection to anything muslims, they were who I was talking about.

read your own post. I talked about Islamic Jihadis and you brought in Muslims to prove your straw man argument.
It's you who are using this, not me. I am pointing at the duplicity.

Is there a point to your post? Extremism by anyone in any form warrants legal action, that's all I was talking about. I wasn't saying that Hindus are terrorists/extremists. If few of them commit crimes, then few will face the music, if more engage in crimes, then more will. I don't have stats on how many commit what kind of crime. If you have ,then do share for knowledge purpose only.
Tired of meeting retards, please don't quote me further, Well I am gonna ignore anyway.

Like I asked, point at the extremism.
Oh wait, now you are bringing in Law & order issues and putting them all under the guise of extremism!
So, 2 dalit under aged girls were molested by gang of muslims in UP. Is that Islamic Extemism or law & order problem?
You can't have it both ways.
I am still asking you to point at Hindu terror Inside and outside India in past 10 years. SHOW ME.

Alright I get what you are. No more Islamic jihad enlightenment for me. Move on and find other volunteers elsewhere.

Huh. I don't care. I am only exposing the duplicity on facts.

I have grown up in Madhya Pradesh, Lived in Varanasi, living in Haryana, keep visiting Delhi, never had any issue with Islamic Jihad. My right next door neighbours since child hood were for the most part Muslims, some my best school mates were muslims. Not that religion anybody professed ever mattered but retards on internet don't stop stalking so I have to recall their communal identities but we never even talked about it cause it never mattered. Not a single fight/issues over religion with Muslims/Christians.

Nonetheless, I wouldn't mind the numbers of Temples destroyed by Jihadis in Last decade since.you claim to have it. With source please.

True. why would you remember the temples destroyed by Islamic Jihadis in last 10 years, right? It wouldn't fit your narrative to find out these facts. Hence you will close your eyes to these facts.
A wilful blind will never see the truth.

You can replace Hindus in your quote with any community ,race or religion and it will be equally true. You can find your like minded people on this very forum from our neighborhood, troll them as much you wish, spare me. Aloha amigo.

Which community?
I am a Dalit Hindu. So, please put in a category, I beg you.
 
Yes, yes It all depends on India to have good relations with neighbours. We need no reciprocation from neighbours. Thanks a ton for the Mahaan Gyan.

It not the question of good or bad but failing to build and extract benefits for the country based on the relationships. Both MMS & Modi have invested more than a decade in building a relationship which produced meager benefits while damaging existing relationships and benefits.
 
the biggest foreign policy achievement of the Modi regime is having successfully traveled around the world to beg a seat those international organizations.
 
Back
Top Bottom